Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083822C070212
Original file (2003083822C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 6 May 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003083822


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Lana E. McGlynn Member
Mr. Larry C. Bergquist Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that he be awarded either the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM).

3. The applicant states that he served overseas in Vietnam and should have been awarded either the VSM or the AFEM.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in Chicago, Illinois, on 13 September 1965. He successfully completed his training at Fort Knox, Kentucky, and was transferred to Thailand on 17 March 1966. He was assigned to the United States Military Assistance Command – Thailand (USAMACTHAI) for duty as a clerk-typist. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 28 June 1967.

5. He served in Thailand until 4 September 1967, when he was returned to Oakland, California. On 21 October 1965, after a brief period of hospitalization, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service. He had served 2 years, 1 month and 9 days of total active service and was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, and the National Defense Service Medal.

6. A review of his records show that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no derogatory information contained in his records.

7. Information obtained from unit records at the National Archives in College Park, Maryland indicates that the USAMACTHAI was established on 15 May 1962 to fulfill direct support functions related to the Vietnam conflict.

8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 serves as the authority for award of the VSM. It provides, in pertinent part, that the VSM was established by Executive Order 11231, 8 July 1965. It is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States serving in Vietnam and contiguous waters or airspace thereover, after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspace thereover, during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award.

9. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant served in Thailand for a period of 18 months with the USAMACTHAI, a unit which provided direct support to operations in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board finds that he is entitled to the award of the VSM.

2. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 13 September 1965 through 21 October 1967. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.

3. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the VSM and the AGCM for the period of 13 September 1965 through 21 October 1967.

BOARD VOTE:

___lb ___ __lem___ ___fe ___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ____Fred N. Eichorn_____
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003083822
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2003/05/06
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 102 107.0056/agcm
2. 119 107.0073/vsm
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055029C070420

    Original file (2001055029C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant served in Thailand in a unit that provided direct support to the operations being conducted in Vietnam and should have been awarded the VSM for his service. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017075

    Original file (20080017075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) based on his service in Thailand. By regulation, the VSM and RVNCM are authorized for members who served in Thailand in units providing direct support to Republic of Vietnam (RVN) operations. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he is eligible for the VSM and RVNCM with Device (1960) based on his service in Thailand;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05372

    Original file (BC-2012-05372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05372 COUNSEL: NONE ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record they were unable to verify award of the RVCM and the VSM. The applicant’s claimed dates of service in Thailand are after the award inclusive period for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04801

    Original file (BC-2012-04801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04801 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) or a Badge reflecting his service during that era. In support of his request the applicant submitted copies of his DD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00951

    Original file (BC 2014 00951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00951 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect military service in Vietnam. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots-on-the-ground in the Republic of Vietnam. The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05385

    Original file (BC-2012-05385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05385 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. There is no documentation in the applicant’s record to verify he served in the area of eligibility for award of the VSM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00846

    Original file (BC-2013-00846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00846 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He traveled to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02774

    Original file (BC-2006-02774.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be eligible, a member must serve on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days, although those time limitations may be waived for personnel participating in actual combat operations. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial as they were unable to verify entitlement to any awards during applicant’s 11 days of service in Vietnam. Should the applicant provide TDY vouchers, flight orders, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014318

    Original file (20140014318 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the awards of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge). The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM and that award should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02452

    Original file (BC-2008-02452.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the requested relief as a thorough review of the applicant’s records failed to provide any evidence, i.e., travel vouchers, flight records, TDY orders, etc., that substantiated any time served in Vietnam. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02452 in Executive Session on 16 December 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: