Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083736C070212
Original file (2003083736C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
SUPPLEMENTAL PROCEEDINGS



         IN THE CASE OF:



         BOARD DATE: 3 July 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003083736


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. A quorum was present during the further consideration and deliberation. The findings appearing in proceedings dated 9 August 2001 were affirmed. The following additional findings, conclusions, and recommendation were adopted by the Board.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Stephanie Thompkins Analyst

         The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings dated  9 August 2001 .

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member
Mr. Patrick H. McGann Member


         The applicant and counsel, if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following additional evidence:

         Exhibit C - Application for correction of military records

         Exhibit D – Prior proceedings







THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:

10. The Board's previous recommendation in this case (AR2001060210) dated 9 August 2001 was for an adjusted date of rank under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) for captain from 25 June 1998 to 14 April 1997, with entitlement to back pay and allowances in the higher grade on that date now requires further review.

11. The applicant submitted a second application dated 23 October 2002 and USARC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement) showing that he was assigned to a captain position effective 7 March 1997, with the 88th Division and requested that his date of rank be adjusted accordingly. It was verified and signed by his commander on 31 October 2002.

12. Under the circumstances the applicant was entitled to promotion to captain on 7 March 1997, provided he was assigned to a captain position on or prior to that date.

13. The ROPMA, a public law enacted by Congress on 5 October 1994 and implemented on 1 October 1996, prescribes the policies and procedures to consolidate and modernize the laws that govern the management of Reserve Component commissioned officers. Under ROPMA, officers in the rank of first lieutenant who were first-time considered and selected for promotion to captain, after having served more than 7 combines years as a lieutenant may be promoted on or before their maximum time in grade (MTIG) date, providing they are in an authorized troop program unit captain position.

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES:

6. At the time of the Board’s 9 August 2001 decision in this case as pertains to the applicant (AR2001060210), it was the intent of the Board to make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time of his promotion to captain.

7. Under ROPMA criteria, based on his first-time consideration/selection he should have been promoted to captain on or before his MTIG date of 30 May 1997, since he was assigned to a captain position before that date.

8. In view of the additional factors in this case the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show he was promoted on the date that final board action should have occurred for the 1996 Reserve Components Selection Board to captain with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 7 March 1997, with entitlement to back pay and allowances.

9. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to further correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the Board’s recommendation appearing in the proceedings, dated 9 August 2001 ABCMR List Case (ROPMA Project) – Phase I (Green) by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to captain with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 7 March 1997, with entitlement to back pay and allowances.

BOARD VOTE:

_KAN___ _RVO___ __PHM__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr._
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003083736
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.00
2. 131.05
3.
4.
5.
6.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061048C070421

    Original file (2001061048C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, United States Code, section 14308(c)(2) states that “Except as specifically authorized by law, a reserve officer is not entitled to additional pay or allowances if the effective date of the officer’s promotion is adjusted to reflect a date earlier than the actual date of the officer’s promotion.” The Chief, Promotion and Notifications Branch, Office of Promotions, PERSCOM, expressed the opinion that the applicant was on active duty on 27 August 1995; therefore, he is not eligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079688C070215

    Original file (2002079688C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was in a TPU and was promoted by the Army Reserve Command on orders dated 2 October 1997, with 30 September 1996 as his date of rank and 2 October 1997 as his effective date. The regulation states, if an officer meets the MTIG date before the approval date of the board, his promotion date and effective date will be no In cases such as this, the Board has adjusted the date of rank of officers considered for promotion to major for the first time for a Reserve promotion based on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077400C070215

    Original file (2002077400C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also stated that he has not cashed the correction paycheck pending this consideration. As in this case, the applicant has submitted evidence showing he was assigned to a captain position on 15 October 1997. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the Board’s recommendation appearing in the proceedings, dated 5 February 2002 ABCMR List Case (ROPMA Project) – Phase IV (Yellow) by showing that the individual concerned was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062876C070421

    Original file (2001062876C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was passed over for promotion to captain by the 1997 and 1998 selection boards, and the boards did not receive his microfiche that indicated he had a Bachelor of Science degree. He was promoted to captain with an effective date of 25 June 1998. The Board also concludes that under these circumstances the applicant was wrongfully denied pay and retirement points for National Guard service as a captain based on his unfair non-selection by the 1997 RCSB and his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081725C070215

    Original file (2002081725C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board's previous recommendation in this case (AR2001061053) dated 23 August 2001 was for an adjusted date of rank under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) for captain from 18 April 2000 to 15 November 1999, with entitlement to back pay and allowances in the higher grade on that date now requires further review. On 23 May 2002, the applicant faxed to the Board a Promotion Qualification Statement showing that he was assigned to a captain position effective 1 October 1998...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052414C070420

    Original file (2001052414C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ROPMA provides that in order to be eligible for promotion to major the MTIG for a captain is 7 years, and that an officer selected for the first time for promotion to the next higher grade may be promoted on or before the date that he/she completed the maximum service. A staff member of the Army Reserve Personnel Command, Military Personnel Actions Branch, expressed the opinion that unit officers recommended by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087533C070212

    Original file (2003087533C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction to his promotion effective date and date of rank for major. He was promoted to major with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 3 January 2000. The Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, expressed the opinion that the officer was promoted to captain on 20 May 1992 and promotion to major required 7 years time in grade; therefore, his promotion eligibility date was 19 May 1999.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081326C070215

    Original file (2002081326C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is asking the Board to take action and adjust his date of rank for captain and promotion eligibility date to the next higher grade to 30 November 1995. He was promoted to captain effective 14 September 1998. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062450C070421

    Original file (2001062450C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was eligible for promotion to major on 1 April 1996, and was not considered for promotion by either active or Reserve boards due to his separation date from active duty. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he was eligible for promotion to major on 1 April 1996, and was not considered for promotion by either active or Reserve boards due to his separation from active duty. Therefore, the applicant’s correct DOR and effective date for promotion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086645C070212

    Original file (2003086645C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation also specifies that an officer shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board far enough in advance of completing the years of service in grade so that, if the officer is recommended for promotion, the promotion may be effective on or before the date on which the officer will complete the required years of service. Army Regulation 135-155 further specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) or a Special Selection...