| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be changed to an entry-level separation (ELS).
APPLICANT STATES: That he believes he should have received an ELS because he was still in a training status and he had not served 180 days in the military.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 19 July 1982, the applicant enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program (DEP). On 1 October 1982, he was separated from the DEP and he enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years and training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (Light Wheel Vehicle/Power Generation Mechanic).
On or about 1 October 1982, the applicant reported to Fort Jackson, South Carolina, for One Station Unit Training. On 6 March 1983, the applicant left his unit in an absent without leave (AWOL) status until he was apprehended and turned over to military authorities at Fort Knox, Kentucky, on 19 May 1985.
On 24 May 1985, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for
the above period of AWOL.
On 28 May 1985, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial. He was advised that he could receive a UOTHC discharge. He authenticated a statement with his signature acknowledging he understood the ramifications and effects of receiving a UOTHC discharge. He did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 29 May 1985, both the applicant's unit and intermediate commanders recommended approval of the applicant's request. On 6 June 1985, the approval authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he be separated with a UOTHC discharge in pay grade E-1, which was the highest pay grade that he achieved.
The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows that, on 1 July 1982, he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 with a UOTHC discharge, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial. He had completed 6 months and 17 days of active military service and he has 806 days of lost time.
There is no evidence that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for review of his discharge under that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge was authorized, a UOTHC discharge was considered appropriate.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11 of that regulation provides for the separation of personnel during the initial 180 days of service while still in an entry-level status. The policy applies to soldiers who have demonstrated that they are not qualified for retention because they cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline. These soldiers are given an uncharacterized discharge and, when discharged under the provisions of chapter 11, are discharged by reason of entry-level status performance and conduct. Only in certain meritorious cases approved by the Secretary of the Army are they entitled to an honorable discharge. Nothing in chapter 11 precludes separation under another provision of this regulation when such separation is warranted. Thus, a soldier who commits a court-martial offense may be so charged and may submit a request for separation under chapter 10.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, to avoid trial by court-martial was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
3. Soldiers may be separated in an entry level status when they have served less than 180 days and it is clearly demonstrated that they are unable to meet the minimum training requirements; for lack of motivation; failure to adapt to military life; and for unsatisfactory performance and conduct. However, nothing precludes a commander from separating an entry-level soldier under any other applicable chapter of the separation regulation. Clearly, the applicant's lengthy period of AWOL warranted the referral of court-martial charges.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__sk____ __cjp___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003083705 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030911 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UOTHC) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19850701 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, Chap 10. . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A70.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.7000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013144
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting that his UOTHC discharge be changed to an uncharacterized discharge based on the fact under current standards if he were discharged he would have received an entry level discharge. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant at the time confirms he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020121
Consistent with the chain of command's recommendations and following a legal review for legal sufficiency, the separation authority approved the administrative discharge and ordered the applicant discharged under the provisions of paragraph 7-17 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of fraudulent enlistment (failure to report arrests by civilian police and conviction for assault) and directed he received an entry level separation. d. Paragraph 3-9 (Uncharacterized Separation) of the version...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083818C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to "honorable-erroneous." Item 24a (Military Service) of his DD Form 1966/2 (Application for Enlistment-Armed Forces of the United States) shows that he failed to disclose/reveal his prior active duty service in the Marine Corps. The Board reviewed the applicant's personnel service records and determined his separation under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000105
The applicant states that going absent without leave (AWOL) from basic combat training as a trainee does not qualify to be the same class of offenses described in Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel). On 18 November 1998, the applicant was discharged from active duty and was issued an UOTHC characterization of service based on the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200. He was charged with being AWOL for 707 days, circumstances which clearly...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000570
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On or about 28 January 1985, he was released from confinement and returned to his basic training unit. On 8 April 1985, his immediate commander informed him of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11 (Entry Level Status Performance and Conduct).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003471
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. his character of service as honorable; and b. an "X" in the "Yes" block of item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent). Soldiers separated under this chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge, a general discharge, or a discharge under other than honorable conditions. The evidence shows the applicant was discharged for fraudulent entry on 30 May 1985 after completing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069578C070402
The Board also took into consideration the applicant’s age at the time of his enlistment. The Board took into consideration the applicant's entire record of service and was convinced that both the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were appropriate considering the facts surrounding his discharge. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2002069578SUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDED20020813TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UOTHC)DATE OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019384
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to an entry-level or uncharacterized discharge. On 18 May 2007, the separation authority approved his voluntary request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows he was AWOL from on or about 5 January 2007 through on or about 5...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607207C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. SPD Code KFS pertains to a soldier separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012561
There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The available evidence shows he was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge. Based on this record of indiscipline and in view of the fact he voluntarily requested discharge to avoid a court-martial that could have resulted in a punitive discharge his overall record of service did not...