Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607207C070209
Original file (9607207C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, the applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to honorable.  He states that his uncharacterized discharge, with the resultant separation code of KFS, and the reenlistment code of RE-3B, are unjust to him, and prejudice his present and future employment.   

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for eight years on 16 April 1985 under a split training option.  He was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) and reported to Fort Dix, New Jersey for basic training on 
9 May 1985.  He completed basic training and his tour was terminated on 12 July 1985.

The applicant was ordered to initial active duty for training for advanced individual training with a reporting date to Fort Sam Houston, Texas of 26 May 1986.  He failed to report for training and was determined to be AWOL.  The applicant surrendered to military authorities at Fort Dix on 10 July 1987 and was assigned to the Fort Dix personnel confinement facility.

On 14 July 1987 the applicant consulted with counsel and requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He stated that he understood the elements of the offense charged against him and was guilty of the charge or of a lesser included offense which also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge.  He stated that under no circumstances did he desire further rehabilitation, and had no desire to perform further military service.  The applicant stated that he understood the nature and consequences of the other than honorable conditions discharge that he might receive.  He declined to submit a statement in his own behalf.

On 1 August 1987 the separation authority approved his request and directed that he receive an entry level separation.  The applicant was discharged at Fort Dix on 
27 August 1987 for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial.  The character of his service was uncharacterized, his separation code was “KFS”, and his reenlistment code, “RE 3-3b”.  He had 3 months and 21 days of active service and 410 days of lost time.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

Paragraph 3-9 of the regulation specifies that soldiers who are within the first 180 days of their enlistments when separation processing is started will normally receive an uncharacterized entry level separation.  The only authorized exceptions are in those cases where an under other than honorable conditions discharge is authorized and or warranted or when the Secretary of the Army determines on a case by case basis that an honorable discharge is warranted by unusual circumstances involving the individual's personal conduct and performance of duty.  However, such honorable discharges may be applied only in cases involving changes in service obligation, convenience of the Government and secretarial plenary authority.

The glossary in the aforementioned regulation defines entry level status for Reserve soldiers for soldiers ordered to IADT for the split or alternate training option-90 days after beginning Phase II (AIT) (Soldiers completing Phase I (Basic) remain in entry level status until 90 days after beginning Phase II).


Army Regulation 601-210, then in effect, prescribes eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment in the Army.  Paragraph 3-8 of that regulation describes the various reenlistment (RE) codes, and states that RE-3B applies to persons who have lost time during their last period of service.  They are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted. 

Army Regulation 635-5-1, then in effect, lists the separation coded designators, the authorities, and the reasons for separation.  SPD Code “KFS” pertains to a soldier separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. 

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 
27 August 1987, the date of his discharge.  The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 27 August 1990.

The application is dated 13 March 1996 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to 
conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

                      EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

                      GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                      CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




		Karl F. Schneider
		Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025111

    Original file (20100025111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his uncharacterized character of service to honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Only the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted (emphasis added). Thus,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007132

    Original file (20070007132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reentry (RE) Code of "3, 3B, and 3C" be change to a more favorable code and that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. RE-3C applies to Soldiers who have completed over 4 months of service who do not meet the basic eligibility pay grade requirements of AR 601-280, chapter 2, or who have been denied reenlistment and who are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted. The evidence shows the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001467

    Original file (20110001467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She further requests correction of item 35 (Record of Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II), to include: a. These orders show she was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 on 8 May 1987. The applicant also requested to add to item 35 of her DA Form 2-1 the dates she attended the scheduled UTAs, the 16 weeks she attended IADT, and the 3 days of ADT at Fort Gordon, GA. 7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017258

    Original file (20090017258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions on 10 October 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service, in lieu of court-martial. The regulation in effect at the time stated the reason for discharge based on separation code “KFS” is “For the good of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000673

    Original file (20090000673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This memorandum shows that the Recruiting Company Commander submitted a request for approval of a reentry waiver for the applicant in order for him to be eligible to enlist in the Army. Further, the applicant's discharge reflects his overall record of military service. Paragraph 4-13 of Army Regulation 601-210 provides that individuals separated under this provision may submit a reentry code waiver request to the appropriate approval authority once a 24-month waiting period has elapsed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008127

    Original file (20100008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted [emphasis added]. (2) The evidence shows the applicant had not completed 90 days of active service after beginning Phase II (AIT). Records show the applicant was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020878

    Original file (20120020878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 6 August 1985 to show her character of service as "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." He or she will only receive a DD Form 220; and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000115

    Original file (20100000115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be changed to an uncharacterized discharge and that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code be changed to a 3. On 9 September 2009, the ADRB, after careful consideration of the applicant's military records and all other available evidence, determined the applicant's discharge was proper and equitable. c. Records show the applicant's assigned RE Code of 4 is appropriate based on the authority and reason for his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028786

    Original file (20100028786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 26 June 1987, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed his reduction to private (PV1)/E-1 and issuance of an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017135

    Original file (20130017135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states: * her records contain several errors that she has tried to get corrected * she served (in the military) from 28 June 1989 to 12 November 1991 * her records show she was in an entry level status when she separated, but she was not * her records show she had no active service or less than 90 consecutive days of active duty training * she was in basic holdover and the count was over 90 days * after she completed basic training, she reported to her station during the required...