Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03094464C070212
Original file (03094464C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 18 MAY 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003094464


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond Wagner Chairperson
Mr. Roger Able Member
Mr. John Denning Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he earned 50 retirement points for his retirement year beginning on 9 July 1998 and ending on 8 July 1999 in order to be credited with a qualifying year of service for retirement purposes.

2. The applicant states that on 10 March 1999 while assigned to the 172nd Medical Logistics Battalion in Ogden, Utah, he received a direct commission in the Army Reserve. His recruiter informed him that he could not drill with the 172nd until the paperwork was finalized, even though he had the commissioning documentation, and that the paperwork would take from 30 to 60 days; however, the process took four months. He was not allowed to drill until July 1999. Since his retirement year starts and ends in July, he missed annual training and four months of drill, ending his retirement year with only 47 points, 3 short of the 50 required for a good year. He states that a direct commission does not cause a break in his service. His paperwork was backdated to 10 March 1999, when he was assigned to the 172nd; however, he was not allowed to drill. He has letters of support in this matter. It is unfair that he should lose a good retirement year when he served faithfully.

3. The applicant provides a 27 May 2003 statement of support from an Army captain; an 18 July 2003 memorandum from the adjutant of the 650th Area Support Group; a copy of orders dated 27 August 1999 releasing him from the 172nd (apparently as an enlisted Soldier) and assigning him to 172nd as an officer, effective 10 March 1999; a copy of his service history; a copy of a 19 January 2000 printout; a copy of his oath of office; and a copy of a 7 May 2003 letter to him from this agency.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. A 28 June 2002 statement of the applicant's retirement points prepared by the Army National Guard shows that the applicant was an enlisted Soldier with the National Guard beginning on 15 March 1990, was assigned to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) from 21 December 1990 until 14 March 1998, and had a break in service until 9 July 1998, when he again became an Army National Guard unit member.

2. On 10 March 1999 the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the Army Reserve as a Medical Service Corps officer. He signed the oath of office on 10 March 1999.

3. On 27 August 1999 the applicant was assigned to the 172nd as an officer effective 10 March 1999.

4. On 1 December 2000 the applicant was discharged from the Army Reserve because of his commission as an officer in the Air Force.

5. In a 27 May 2003 statement of support an Army Nurse Corps (ANC) officer stated that he assisted the applicant in processing his application packet for appointment, and that he [the ANC officer] and his gaining unit instructed him that he could not drill as an officer until he received his appointment letter and orders, which normally took 45 to 60 days. For some reason it took longer in his case, affecting his eligibility for a good retirement year.

6. In an 18 July 2003 memorandum to this Board, the adjutant of the 650th Area Support Group requested that the applicant's request be granted, stating that he was assigned to the 172nd and was advised to discontinue performing Reserve drills until his direct commission was fully processed, causing him to not attain a good retirement year.

7. A computer printout of the applicant's retirement points shows that he earned a total of 47 points for his retirement year ending on 8 July 1999.

8. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the 70th Regional Support Team. A member of that team stated that without a signed oath of office and leave and earning statements, his points for the year in question could not be tallied.

9. A copy of the opinion was furnished the applicant. In responding, he stated that he had furnished his oath of office and summary of drill points, again enclosed the relevant documents, and would forward leave and earning statements.

10. Army Regulation 140-185 prescribes the types of training and activities for which retirement points are authorized and the procedures for recording retirement point credits and training for Reserve soldiers. After 1 July 1949, the retirement year will be the date of initial entry or reentry (after a break in service) into a Reserve component, or date of transfer to the Reserve component upon release from active duty, or date of transfer from an inactive Reserve status to an active Reserve status. The retirement year once established will not change as long as the soldier has continuous service in a Reserve and/or regular component.

11. Beginning 1 July 1949 the law has required Reserve soldiers to earn a minimum of 50 retirement points each full retirement year in order to have that year credited a qualifying service. For periods less than a full retirement year a proportionate number of points for the fraction of a year must be earned in order to have that period credited as qualifying service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
:

1. The applicant had 47 points for his retirement year ending on 8 July 1999. His contention that he was not allowed to drill until his appointment documentation was received is supported by apparently his nurse recruiter, and by the adjutant of the 650th Area Support Group. The 172nd was a subordinate unit of that command. His contention is accepted; consequently, it would be reasonable to assume that had he been allowed to drill with his Reserve unit he would have attained the necessary 50 points for a qualifying year of service.

2. Although there is no error in the applicant's records, his failure to attain the required points for a qualifying year of service appears to be not his fault. His request is reasonable. As a matter of equity his request should be granted.
Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show that he earned an additional 3 inactive duty point for retirement points only (Code N) for a total of 50 retirement points for his retirement year ending on 8 July 1999, giving him a qualifying year of service for retirement purposes.

BOARD VOTE:


__RW __ __RA ___ __JD ___ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he earned an additional 3 inactive duty point for retirement points only (Code N) for a total of 50 retirement points for his retirement year ending on 8 July 1999, giving him a qualifying year of service for retirement purposes.







                  ___ Raymond Wagner_____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003094464
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20040518
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 108.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2003-036

    Original file (2003-036.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated October 30, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant, now serving as a lieutenant in the Reserve, asked the Board to correct his record to show that he earned at least 50 points in his anniversary years ending in 1997 and 1998, so that each anniversary year would count as a satisfactory year of federal service for retirement purposes.1 He alleged that because the Coast Guard erroneously recorded his participation as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002345

    Original file (20120002345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was not given credit for all the retirement points he earned during 2011 while serving in the Standby Reserve for points only. Paragraph 3-3(3) states the DA Form 1380 is used to record inactive duty training by non-unit Soldiers under the jurisdiction of HRC who are attached for retirement points only to USAR troop program units, ARNG units, or to another service or component for training. Army Regulation 140-10, paragraph 3-3, states a DA Form 1380 is used to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074447C070403

    Original file (2002074447C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that he was granted 3 additional points toward his qualifying service for early Reserve retirement. Army Regulation 135-180 also states in paragraph 2-3, that a 20-Year Letter will be issued to the Reserve component soldier within 1 year after they complete 20 years of qualifying service for retirement. That upon completion of the administrative action required by Paragraph 1a through 1b, above, that the IAARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009500C070208

    Original file (20040009500C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded retirement points for the period that he was denied the opportunity to serve and drill with his unit, back pay and allowance for all drills and service that he could have performed with his unit, consideration of promotion opportunities he missed while he was kept away from his unit, and a refund of payments made for coverage of SGLI (Service members Life Insurance) he was required to make after he was restored to duty with his unit. A...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09631-02

    Original file (09631-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to allow him the opportunity to earn reserve retirement. of the anniversary years ending on 17 August 2002 he has been credited with 15 years of qualifying service. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's b. naval record.

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2010-040

    Original file (2010-040.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    • • • On April 24, 1995, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard Reserve. of the Pay Manual, COMDTINST M7220.29B, states that creditable service for pay purposes includes “all periods of active duty inactive service … in any Regular or Reserve component.” However, Chapter 2.B.4.a. However, the 1995 RATMAN defines an “anniversary year” as extending “from the date of entry or reen- try to the day preceding the anniversary of entry or reentry” and the 1997 RPM states that a reservist’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07321-06

    Original file (07321-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    the next 15 years. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from the Navy Personnel Command which states, in part, as follows:.... Because his record shows that he had only eleven years of qualifying service at that time, he was honorably discharged from the Navy Reserve on 1 October2003.We have reviewed the paperwork (Petitioner) provided with his petition and have updated his record .... to show 16 qualifying year of service and a total of 1199 points. This correction will allow...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2002-136

    Original file (2002-136.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that in January 1989 he received a letter from the Commandant, endorsed by CCGD one, stating that the applicant had failed to earn the minimum 27 points required to remain in the Active Reserve for the anniversary year ending September 2, 1988. The Chief Counsel stated that notwithstanding the Coast Guard's delay in processing the applicant's reserve application and oath of office, the applicant is not entitled to a correction of his record to provide point credit for drills that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002463

    Original file (20090002463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He responded by reiterating his request to be issued a 15 year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, and further requests that he be given 20 additional inactive duty points for RYE 12 June 1998 for completion of the Army Sales and Management Training Course which would give him a total of 53 retirement points for that year; and he requests that he be given 4 months credit for the months he was assigned to different units between 28 June 1992 to 27 June 1993. While...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010525C070208

    Original file (20040010525C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show that he was appointed in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) from the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC), Infantry (IN) Branch, as a second lieutenant effective 12 May 1969, with an educational delay to obtain a bachelor's degree. The applicant submits a copy of his MRD Computation Sheet that indicates his date of initial appointment as 12 May 1969; total break in service as 1 year, 2 months, and 18 days; authorized service time as 28 years; date...