Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03094124C070212
Original file (03094124C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved





                     SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS



      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            22 APRIL 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2003094124


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.  A quorum was present during the
further consideration and deliberation.  The findings appearing in
proceedings dated
13 February 2003 were affirmed.  The following additional findings,
conclusions, and recommendations were adopted by the Board.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |

      The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to
reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings
dated
13 February 2003.

|     |Mr. James C. Hise                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Linda D. Simmons              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Frank C. Jones II             |     |Member               |


      The applicant and counsel, if any, did not appear before the Board.

      The Board considered the following additional evidence:

      Exhibit C – (show the identifying data for the original Record of
Proceedings)






CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:

13.  On 6 August 2003 new information was received from the applicant in
regard to the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records
(ABCMR) in Docket Number AR2002076094, dated 13 February 2003.

14.  The evidence submitted consists of a statement by the applicant that
his civil charge for vandalism was dismissed in settlement on 30 March 1993
and not in 2002 as the Board concluded in its original deliberations.  He
submitted a copy of the court action in support of his statement.

ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

6.  At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR2002076094,
dated 13 February 2003, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the
applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have
been at the time.

7.  The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR2002076094, erroneously
concluded that the applicant’s civil charge was dismissed in 2002 when in
actuality it was dismissed on 30 March 1993 as the applicant indicated.
The 2002 date was the date the state expunged his record.

BOARD VOTE:

__JCH __  __LDS __  __FCJ___  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

3.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant amendment of the decision of the Army Board for Correction of
Military Records set forth in Docket Number AR2002076094, dated 13 February
2003, to show that the vandalism charge was “dismissed in settlement on 30
March 1993” vice “dismissed in settlement in 2002” as was previously
directed.


            ____James C. Hise ______
                    CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2003094124                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20040422                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076094C070215

    Original file (2002076094C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board notes that the expungement action by the General Sessions Court of Montgomery County, Tennessee was directed at public records in municipal, community or state agencies and does not compel Department of the Army, a military department of the federal government to expunge information in its records. The Board also notes that under the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act the information contained in the applicant's 1996 reenlistment action would not be releasable to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084145C070212

    Original file (2003084145C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel advised that he had submitted the General Orders and the award certificate for award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device to the applicant as evidence in support of his 6 August 2002 application. In view of the additional factors in the applicant's case, this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence upon which to base correction of the applicant's military records to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster) heroism on 5...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00412

    Original file (BC-2004-00412.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the BOI found he had committed the other offenses and recommended the applicant receive a general discharge from the Air Force. He had seven days time lost due to civilian confinement. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommends the applicant’s requests be denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099341C070212

    Original file (03099341C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition to documents which confirm that he attempted to have specific training documents placed in his file, he also submits a copy of the procedures for appealing the Career Field Designation, and a letter, authored by the Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Equal Opportunity), supporting his petition to be reconsidered for promotion by a Special Selection Board. The documents confirm the applicant’s attempt to place training documents in his file, the letter of support from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005437C070206

    Original file (20050005437C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 October 1996, the FSM and the applicant divorced. The Marital Settlement Agreement awarded the applicant one-half of the FSM's retired pay but did not mention the SBP. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015916

    Original file (20060015916.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The results of this request are not available for review with this application. Records show that after several appeal attempts the applicant was involuntarily separated from his AGR position on 31 January 2002 and reverted to a unit member of the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG). There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which shows that the DD Form 214 issued at the time of his removal from the AGR program was prepared incorrectly or otherwise flawed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003361

    Original file (20070003361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of a DD Form 490 (Record of Trial); DA Form 4430-R (Department of the Army Report of Result of Trial); United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, Army 20000094, Memorandum Opinion, dated 25 January 2002; United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, Army 20000094, Order, dated 21 February 2002; DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 2 May 2003; and a 2-page, undated Letter in Support. On appeal to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001068

    Original file (20150001068.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 28 January 2003, he was honorably released from active duty. On 28 February 2006, he retired from active duty and he was placed on the Retired List effective 1 March 2006. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement, provided all other program eligibility...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014451C070206

    Original file (20050014451C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records contain a copy of DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), which shows that he was present for duty (PDY) after being confined by civil authorities (CCA) effective 25 December 1986. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100445C070208

    Original file (2004100445C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Yolanda Maldonado | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests the removal of orders from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that awarded him the Ranger Tab effective 13 February 1996. The available evidence clearly establishes that the orders awarding him the Ranger Tab for completion of Ranger training were published before he completed the training and apparently were distributed...