| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Kenneth L. Wright | Member | |
| Mr. Eric N. Andersen | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable.
2. The applicant states that when he was discharged he was informed that within six months he could have his discharge upgraded to honorable. He is now 42 years old, has matured, and is trying to straighten out his life.
3. The applicant provided no evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error or injustice which occurred on 29 May 1980. The application submitted in this case is dated 18 June 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should commence on the date of final action by the ADRB. In complying with this decision, the ABCMR has adopted the broader policy of calculating the 3-year time limit from the date of exhaustion in any case where a lower level administrative remedy is utilized.
3. The applicant enlisted in the Army for three years on 23 March 1978, completed training, and in September 1978 was assigned to Fort Polk, Louisiana as an equipment maintenance clerk. In December 1979 he was promoted to pay grade E-4.
4. On 26 March 1980 the applicant went AWOL (absent without leave). He returned to duty on 8 April 1980.
5. On 16 April 1980 the applicant received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for the above-mentioned AWOL period. His punishment included confinement for 30 days in the Correctional Confinement Facility to commence on 21 April 1980. The applicant did not appeal the punishment.
6. On 22 April 1980 court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for willfully disobeying a lawful command from a commissioned officer to serve the punishment of correctional custody for 30 days to commence on 21 April 1980, and for willfully disobeying the lawful order of two noncommissioned officers.
7. The applicant consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. He stated that he was making the request of his own free will and had not been coerced by any person. He stated that he was guilty of the charges against him, which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He stated that under no circumstances did he want further rehabilitation, for he did not want to perform further military service. He stated that he understood the nature and consequences of the other than honorable conditions discharge that he might receive. The applicant submitted a statement to the effect that he was having family problems and financial problems. He stated that his wife was very sick, and as far as the military was concerned, he could not afford to support her, family wise or money wise.
8. On 21 May 1980 the separation authority approved the applicant's request and directed that he be issued a discharge certificate Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. The applicant was discharged on 29 May 1980.
9. On 15 August 1980, in an unanimous opinion, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request to upgrade his discharge.
10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request for a discharge, even after appropriate and proper consultation with a military lawyer, tends to show he wished to avoid the court-martial and the punitive discharge that he might have received. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
2. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request. There is no error in the applicant's records or an injustice done to him. His request to upgrade his discharge is not granted.
3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 15 August 1980; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 14 August 1983. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__KAN __ __KLW__ __ENA __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003093381 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040304 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710378
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 30 October 1980, his commander notified him of his intent to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct-...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063473C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 28 January 1983, the Army Discharge Review Board in an unanimous opinion, denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge. The applicant has not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013890C071029
The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice that occurred on 15 September 1982, the date she was notified by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) it had determined, based on her military records and all other available evidence, she had been properly discharged. On 29 October 1980, the applicant's unit commander notified her he was recommending that she be discharged from the Army under the provision of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, chapter 14. On 25 November...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199709323
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether he application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military records be corrected to show that he was separated by reason of physical disability. The applicant has not presented and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093308C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 19 December 1980 the applicant reenlisted in the Army for 4 years. Special Court-Martial Order Number 138, published by Headquarters, U.S. Army Infantry Center and Fort Benning on 9 September 1982, shows that the applicant was arraigned and charged with eight specifications of misconduct, e.g., AWOL,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071651C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. That officer added a statement at a later date that the applicant had received nonjudicial punishment for seven days of AWOL. The applicant was discharged on 28 January 1975.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012770
The applicant requests his discharge be changed to an Honorable Discharge. On 3 April 1978, the applicant was discharged with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. This Board does not grant relief by upgrading a discharge characterization solely for the purpose of enabling a person to take advantage of Department of Veterans Affairs benefits.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065966C070421
PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, under other than honorable conditions, by reason of an administrative discharge for conduct triable by a court-martial on 11 January 1980. The applicant has not presented and the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005266C070205
Fields | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's statement that he never sold drugs and he was told that he would receive veteran benefits once he became a civilian is not supported by the evidence of record. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his records to show a general discharge or an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057671C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was discharged on 31...