| Mr. Loren G. Harrell | Director | |
| Ms. Gale Thomas | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis W. Barbee, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by upgrading his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge to honorable. He states that he is trying to get a small business loan; that he has done his time (3 years) at a prison in Germany; and was discharged UOTHC.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 19 April 1977, he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years.
On 25 July 1977, he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for stealing. His punishment was forfeiture.
On 11 April 1978, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial for stealing, 2 specifications; and for unlawfully entering the dining facility with intent to commit larceny, 2 specifications. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days, forfeiture, and reduction to pay grade E-1.
On 17 July 1978, he accepted NJP under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ, for willfully disobeying a superior noncommissioned officer. His punishment was forfeiture.
On 27 November 1978, he accepted NJP under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ, for being drunk while on duty on 12 October 1978, and for failure to go to his appointed place of duty on 13 October 1978. His punishment was forfeiture and extra duty.
On 21 May 1979, he was found guilty by a German civil court for armed robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. He was sentenced to 3 years in prison.
On 29 October 1980, the applicant was release from prison after spending 254 days in confinement.
On 30 October 1980, his commander notified him of his intent to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct- conviction by civil court.
On 30 October 1980, a physical examination qualified the applicant for separation.
On 31 October 1980, a psychiatric evaluation cleared the applicant for separation.
On 31 October 1980, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicant’s separation under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 14, and directed the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge certificate.
On 3 November 1980, he was discharged with an UOTHC discharge, under the above cited regulation. His Report of Separation indicates he had 1 year, 8 months and 20 days of creditable service with 389 days of lost time
On 6 November 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, convictions by civil authorities, desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (AR 15-185, paragraph 8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the ABCMR should commence on the date of final denial by the ADRB. In complying with this decision, the Board has adopted the broader policy of calculating the 3 year time limit from the date of exhaustion in any case where a lower level administrative remedy is utilized. The Board will continue to excuse any failure to timely file when it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 6 November 1981, the date of final action by the ADRB. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 6 November 1984.
The application is dated 6 June 1997 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jhl__ ___cwb__ __rvo___ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710182
He enlisted in the Army on 29 August 1978 for 3 years. His sentence of a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 6 months, and a forfeiture of $334 pay for 6 months was approved on 11 August 1981. On 7 June 1982, he was discharged, in pay grade E-1, with a bad conduct discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710182C070209
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. His sentence of a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 6 months, and a forfeiture of $334 pay for 6 months was approved on 11 August 1981. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709410
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710247
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether he application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709821
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709410C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199709323
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether he application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military records be corrected to show that he was separated by reason of physical disability. The applicant has not presented and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706301
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether he application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. The applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708825
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706667
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board to have the narrative reason for discharge removed from her records. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time...