Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082874C070215
Original file (2002082874C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 18 November 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002082874


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Robert J. McGowan Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Mark D. Manning Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty), dated 27 November 1981, be corrected in three areas:

         a. Block 12i (Reserve Obligation Termination Date) should be changed from "00 - 00 - 00" to "01 - 07 - 01."

         b. Block 23 (Type of Separation) should be changed from "Discharge" to "Release."

         c. Block 26 (Separation Code) should be changed from "JBK" to "MBK."

2. The applicant states, in effect, that the areas cited on her DD Form 214 are incorrect and need to be fixed.

3. The applicant provides a copy of the subject DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of three alleged errors which occurred on 27 November 1981. The application submitted in this case is dated 4 December 2002.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years on 28 November 1977 and was honorably discharged on 27 November 1981 under the provisions of chapter 2, Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, by reason of completion of required service.

4. Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, Enlisted Personnel, then in effect, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 2 of that regulation provided, in pertinent part, for the separation of personnel upon completion of their period of enlistment.


5. AR 635-5, Separation Documents, then in effect, prescribed the separation documents to be prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from military service, and established standardized policy for completing the DD Form 214.

6. Army Regulation (AR) 635-5-1 provides separation codes for Soldiers based upon the type of separation -- discharge with no further obligation, or release from active duty (REFRAD) with a Reserve obligation -- and the nature of the separation, i.e., voluntary or involuntary. AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designators, then in effect, listed the specific authorities and reasons for separation. It provided that Soldiers separated under chapter 2, AR 635-200 would be given a narrative reason for separation of "Completion of required service (ETS)" and a separation code of "JBK" in Block 26.

7. In response to her request for correction of her DD Form 214, the US Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) made an administrative correction to Block 12i by changing the entry from "00 - 00 - 00" to "01 - 07 - 01." PERSCOM refused any further changes because the applicant's DD Form 214 was correct as written.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. AR 635-5-1, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, did not provide separation codes for voluntary discharge or REFRAD by reason of ETS. Many Soldiers were given the only separation code available -- "JBK" which really signified an involuntary discharge with no follow-on Reserve obligation.

2. The record indicates that the applicant served to completion of her ETS and voluntarily separated. Since she still had a 2-year Reserve obligation, her separation should have been a REFRAD. Therefore, Block 23 should have indicated "Release" and Block 12i should have held the date on which her Reserve obligation was completed, in this case "83 - 11 - 27." Furthermore, Block 9 (Command to Which Transferred) should have read "USAR Control Group (Reinforcement)" instead of "NA." The applicant should have been honorably discharged from the Reserve effective 27 November 1983.

3. In response to a similar case, the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 advised the staff of the Board that the proponent of AR 635-5-1, then in effect, provided a separation code only for the involuntary discharge of enlisted Soldiers separated by reason of expiration term of service (ETS). The proponent did not provide a separation code for voluntary discharge or voluntary/involuntary REFRAD under the provisions of AR 635-200. This was rectified in August 1993 with a revision to AR 635-5-1.

4. Under current standards, AR 635-5-1, dated 1 December 2000, Table C-1 (Voluntary Release from Active Duty or Transfer) now cites the separation code of "MBK" for Soldiers REFRAD by reason of ETS.

5. The PERSCOM-issued DD Form 215 is incorrect as it reflects a period of time rather than an end date for the applicant's Reserve obligation.

BOARD VOTE:

__jns___ __mdm___ __bje___ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

         a. Voiding the DD Form 215, dated 17 January 2003;

         b. Correcting Block 12i to read "83 - 11 - 27;"

         c. Correcting Block 23 to reflect "REFRAD" vice "Discharge;"

         d. Showing the separation code, Block 26, of the individual concerned as "MBK" as an exception to policy;

         e. Correcting Block 9 to read "USAR Control Group (Reinforcement);"

         f. Adding the following statement in the Remarks section of her DD Form 214 to the effect that "Release from Active Duty is considered Voluntary. Separation Code "MBK" is authorized as an exception to policy;" and by

g. Showing that the Service member was honorably discharged from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 27 November 1983.


2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing Block 12i to read "01 - 07 - 01" because such an entry would not be correct.




                           John N. Slone
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2002082874
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031118
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT PLUS
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004951

    Original file (20070004951.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 18 February 2001 under the provisions of chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of RE-1 or RE-3 are the applicable RE codes assigned for individuals voluntarily REFRAD at the completion of enlistment and transferred to the Reserve Component to complete his/her military service obligation. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084778C070212

    Original file (2003084778C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that her SPD code is applicable to someone that is barred from reenlisting. The Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 at Headquarters, Department of the Army advised that the regulation prior to August 1993 did not provide an SPD code for the voluntary discharge or voluntary/involuntary REFRAD of Soldiers under the provisions of chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of ETS; an SPD code was only provided to cover the situation of involuntary discharge of enlisted Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072438C070403

    Original file (2002072438C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This records review revealed no evidence in regard to the applicant’s SPD code assignment upon his separation in 1989. The evidence of record indicates that at the completion of his first period of service on 24 January 1989, the applicant was assigned a SPD code of JBK and a corresponding RE code of RE-3A. However, based on a review of the applicant’s record for his period of active duty service that ended on 16 June 1991, the Board finds no indication that the applicant was barred from,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006785C070205

    Original file (20060006785C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she was never in the U.S. Army Reserve and that her reserve obligation date in item 12i, of her DD Form 214, should be removed and that she was serving in pay grade E-3 prior to her release from active duty. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 6 August 1982, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, paragraph 5-31, EPD, in pay grade E-2, with transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020366

    Original file (20120020366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * page 1 of a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 19 November 1988 * a Western Union Mailgram from the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), St. Louis, MO, dated 21 January 1991 * a U.S. Army Individual Ready Reserve recognition certificate in support of Operation Desert Storm * his U.S. Army Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 5 February 1991 * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 February 1991 * a DARP Form 249-2-E (Chronological...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063638C070421

    Original file (2001063638C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5-1, as in effect at the time of the applicant’s release from active duty, lists the separation code MBK for use in officer cases only. There was no corresponding code for a voluntary release from active service with a transfer to the Reserve Components for enlisted personnel. Under current regulations a separation code of LBK is used for a soldier who is released from active duty but who is ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002495C070208

    Original file (20040002495C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s OMPF contains no evidence of his overseas service, other than his service in Korea, and as indicated on his DD Form 214. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry (RE) codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Separation Program Designator Code (SPD)/Reentry (RE) Code Cross- Reference Table, dated 31 March 2003, provides instructions for determining the RE code for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016724

    Original file (20080016724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was authorized separation pay upon his discharge in May 1983. On 4 October 1981, the commander of the Soldier who accidently fired his weapon submitted a report of disciplinary or administrative action and indicated that the aggravated assault was unfounded and that a written reprimand/admonition was rendered to that Soldier for dereliction of duty. With respect to the applicant's contention that the Board should conduct an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018452

    Original file (20130018452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065648C070421

    Original file (2001065648C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her discharge be revoked and she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Effective 29 September 2000, the applicant was separated on her ETS under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, on completion of required active service. New AR-PERSCOM orders should be issued to show that the applicant was voluntarily transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 30 September 2000.