Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065648C070421
Original file (2001065648C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 18 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001065648


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Vic Whitney Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that her discharge be revoked and she be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3. The applicant states that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) should be corrected to show that she was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

4. The applicant’s military records show that at the time of her separation she was serving in the Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) program in the pay grade of E-7. Documentation concerning her separation is not in the available record. Information obtained from the Soldier Management System (SMS) at the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) shows that she was informed in April 2000 that she should forward her request to separate on the expiration of her term of service (ETS) as soon as possible.

5. A SMS entry for 26 May 2000 states that the applicant’s request for separation on her ETS was received by AR-PERSCOM. The request also confirmed that the applicant did not desire to continue in the AGR program.
AR-PERSCOM orders D-06-800141, dated 6 June 2000, discharged the applicant effective 29 September 2000.

6. Effective 29 September 2000, the applicant was separated on her ETS under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, on completion of required active service.

7. A 1 December 2000 SMS entry shows that she was provided a copy of her Letter of Notification for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter), dated 6 January 2000. An additional SMS entry on 26 December 2000, shows that the applicant called AR-PERSCOM to inquire about transfer to the Retired Reserve instead of discharge. She was provided information to apply to this Board.

8. A 5 October 2001 Chronological Statement of Retirement Points shows that the applicant had been credited with over 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay.

9. Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted soldiers. Chapter 4 provides for separation on the date the soldier completes the period for which enlisted.

10. Army Regulation 140-30 provides the policy for the AGR program. It provides that an AGR soldier will be reassigned to the Ready Reserve on release from the AGR program unless the soldier requests discharge or transfer to the Retired Reserve.


11. Army Regulation 140-10 prescribes the policy and procedures for transfer to the Retired Reserve. It provides for transfer to the Retired Reserve for soldiers who have completed a minimum of 20 qualifying years for retired pay at age 60. It also provides that the individual must request transfer to the Retired Reserve in writing or be discharged upon ETS or upon reaching mandatory removal.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. Notwithstanding that the applicant was separated on her ETS in accordance with regulations, the applicant was eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve on her separation date where she would remain a mobilization asset in the case of a National emergency.

2. It would now be in the interest of fairness and equity to revoke her discharge order and show that she was transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on that same date.

3. It would also be appropriate to correct her DD Form 214, in block 9 (Command to which Transferred), to show that she was transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).

4. New AR-PERSCOM orders should be issued to show that the applicant was voluntarily transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 30 September 2000.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by:

         a. revoking AR-PERSCOM orders D-06-800141, dated 6 June 2000, that discharged the applicant effective 29 September 2000;

         b. issuing orders to show that she was transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 29 September 2000;

         c. correcting her DD Form 214, in block 9 (Command to which Transferred), to show that she was transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement); and




         d. transferring the applicant to the Retired Reserve effective 30 September 2000.

BOARD VOTE
:

__fe___ __rb___ __be___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Fred N. Eichorn___
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001065648
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020418
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2. 136.03
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085863C070212

    Original file (2003085863C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072661C070403

    Original file (2002072661C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also stated that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve due to a medical disqualification. The applicant had not done so. Army Regulation 140-111 (U. S. Army Reserve Reenlistment Program), Table 2-1, states that soldiers must meet Army weight standards and have a current (within five years) qualifying military physical to be reenlisted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003436C070205

    Original file (20060003436C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her discharge be revoked and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. At the time of her request for discharge, the applicant was afforded the option to request transfer to the Retired Reserve based on her 20-Years Letter and completion of more than 20 years of service with no derogatory information. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076779C070215

    Original file (2002076779C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the obligated period of service, the soldier will not apply for voluntary nondisability retirement unless the soldier is (a) eligible for retirement by completion 30 years or more active Federal service and (b) already eligible through prior service for a higher grade at retirement and (c) over 58 years of age. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003647

    Original file (20080003647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) on 6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged. AR-PERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, show that the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR effective that date. In pertinent part, it stated that promotion vacancies were not required for IRR promotions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075456C070403

    Original file (2002075456C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be reenlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) and that he be provided his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments. He enlisted in the Army Reserve on 18 July 1992, for a period of 3 years with an established expiration of term of service (ETS) of 17 July 1995. A VSI recipient must remain eligible for retention or reenlistment in the Ready Reserve by maintaining Army weight standards, completing a military physical examination every five...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089538C070212

    Original file (2003089538C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Since the applicant had over 20 qualifying years of service, he should have been given the opportunity to elect to be transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) and, from there, to the Retired Reserve. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing: a. that he extended his 29 April 1991...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073506C070403

    Original file (2002073506C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. USAR soldiers must request a waiver and submit documentation to show that nonparticipation was due to circumstances beyond their control. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091732C070212

    Original file (2003091732C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He enlisted in the Army Reserve on 16 April 1992, for a period of 3 years with an established ETS of 15 April 1995. On 17 April 2001 the applicant was discharged. The applicant is authorized to receive VSI payments each year until 15 April 2014 if he qualifies and continues to reenlist.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099776C070212

    Original file (03099776C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She should have been before the Army Reserve promotion board in 2001. On 22 November 2002 the Personnel Command Enlisted Promotions Branch notified this agency that the applicant was considered for promotion by the DA Enlisted Standby Advisory Board, which adjourned on 15 October 2002, and that she was not recommended for promotion under the CY02 SFC promotion selection board [criteria]. Orders published by the Army Reserve Personnel Command on 10 September 2003 show that the applicant was...