Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069185C070402
Original file (2002069185C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 12 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002069185

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member
Mr. William D. Powers Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of her military records to reflect her current sex.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that she has changed her sex from male to female and now desires her military records to coincide with this change. She states that a correction of her gender in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) to show her current sex would allow her to receive TRICARE benefits. In support of her application, she submits the following documents: letter of support, medical information pertaining to her gender change, court degree granting a gender change, certificate of birth, and a copy of the TRICARE denial claim for gynecological examination.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 31 May 1998, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), for the purpose of retirement, after completing 21 years, 5 months, and 31 days of active military service.

The Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge
(DD Form 214), issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of separation, confirms that at the time, the applicant held the rank of master sergeant (MSG) and was serving in military occupational specialty (MOS) 63Z (Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor).

The DD Form 214 also shows that the applicant earned the following awards while serving on active duty: Legion of Merit; Army Commendation Medal
(7th Award); Army Achievement Medal (5th Award); Joint Meritorious Unit Award; Army Good Conduct Medal (7th Award); Southwest Asia Service Medal with
1 bronze service star; and the Humanitarian Service Medal. The military records and separation document confirm that the applicant’s active duty service was performed as a male.

The applicant provided a court decree, dated 4 September 2001, issued by the Circuit Court of the City of Colonial Heights, Virginia, which ordered a change to the applicant’s gender from male to female.

A TRICARE claim, dated 15 June 2001, denied the applicant payment for a gynecological examination because the gender listed for the applicant on the DEERS was male.


TRICARE Policy Manual 6010.47-M, chapter 3, provides policy and guidance for intersex surgery. It states, in pertinent part, surgery performed to correct gender confusion (i.e. ambiguous genitalia) which has been documented to be at birth is a covered benefit. However, those services and supplies directly and indirectly related to intersex surgery for other than ambiguous genitalia, documented to be present at birth, are excluded from cost-sharing.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes and understands the applicant’s desire to have the gender recorded in the military records changed to reflect the current gender. However, it finds an insufficient evidentiary basis to grant the requested relief.

2. The applicant enlisted, served, and was honorably retired from the Army as a male, which is the gender recorded in the military records. The fact that subsequent to service, the applicant changed genders from male to female does not provide a sufficiently mitigating basis for changing the gender recorded in the military records.

3. The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. While the Board understands the applicant’s desire to have the records changed, it finds no compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records.

4. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that a change to gender in the DEERS would allow payment of TRICARE benefits associate with the gender change. However, eligibility for medical treatment under TRICARE is governed by the Department of Defense (DOD). Current TRICARE policy published by the DOD excludes payment of TRICARE benefits for services and supplies related to intersex surgery for other than ambiguous genitalia documented to be present at birth. Therefore, this Board has no basis for granting the requested relief.

5. The Board wishes to advise the applicant that a copy of this decisional document, along with the application and supporting evidence provided confirming the gender change will be filed in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the applicant’s current gender, the gender recorded in the military record and under which the applicant served. This should satisfy the applicant’s desire to have the current gender documented in the OMPF.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002069185
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/09/12
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.1100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082178C070215

    Original file (2002082178C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier application to correct her military records to show her current sex. She also requests that her military records be corrected to show her new name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010594

    Original file (20080010594.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They have advised him that he needs to have his military records completely changed to show his gender as male for them to correct their records. The applicant did not undergo the sex reassignment surgery (from female to male) or change of name until more than 16 years after discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. including in the applicant's official records the fact that as of the 31 January...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702282

    Original file (9702282.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. REQUESTED ACTION: ' Member wants sex/gender marker of male on master ' personnel record and master personnel files changed to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00989

    Original file (BC-2002-00989.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00989 INDEX CODE 100.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The DD Form 214 issued upon retirement be changed to reflect the current legal name of “------.” rather than “-----.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 12 February 2002, she...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01798

    Original file (BC-2002-01798.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to his name change and gender reassignment on 31 Jul 98, the applicant submitted an application to the Board requesting a DD Form 214 correction to reflect the name as J---- Marie W----. DPSAMP states that Air Force personnel records correctly reflects the applicant's name and gender during the period of service and on the date of retirement. In this case the DD Form 214 is correct as of the date of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008296

    Original file (20100008296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The enlistment documents on file report the applicant's first name was "John" and the applicant's gender was male. All documents and orders on file in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that contain a name and/or gender show the first name "John" and gender as male. The applicant contends that her military record should be corrected to show her correct first and middle names and gender.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006388C070208

    Original file (20040006388C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006388 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to reflect her gender reassignment (sex change) and name change. He was separated from active duty and discharged from the USAR under that name and gender.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008061

    Original file (20090008061.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that her military records be changed to reflect her name change from Alan Wells V------l to Vanessa Ann W---s and gender change from male to female. The applicant submitted a document from the Superior Court of Fulton County that decreed that her name was changed from Alan Wells V------l to Vanessa Ann W---S and that the applicant's legal gender status be changed from male to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005444

    Original file (20080005444.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her military records to show her current name and sex. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802489

    Original file (9802489.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    To grant the relief sought would cause undue administrative burdens on the military records custodian in the correction of records that were not recorded in error. The original male name and gender on Chief ’s DD Form 214 were correct at the time the document was issued; 2. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair Attachment: Record of Proceedings AFBCMR 98-02489 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: I have carefully reviewed the...