Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081828C070215
Original file (2002081828C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 15 MAY 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002081828


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Thomas A. Pagan Member
Mr. Roger W. Able Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that the Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election (DD Form 2839) be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

3. The applicant states that she was not eligible for the CSB at the time the request was submitted. All documents should have been returned. She will not be eligible until May 2003.

4. The applicant’s military records show that on 21 April 1988, while then a member of the 395th Military Police Detachment, a Reserve Component unit in Lexington, Kentucky, she requested enlistment in the Regular Army. On 2 November 1988 she enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years in the rank of private first class and has remained on continuous active duty. Her enlistment document of 2 July 1992 shows that she had 1 year, 2 months, and 11 days of total inactive military service.

5. On 11 December 2001 the applicant completed the CSB Election, indicating that she was eligible and elected to receive the CSB. In completing this election, the applicant stated, "I understand that if I receive the CSB in error, I must repay the full before tax bonus amount." The eligibility requirements, as indicated on the election form, require a member to be on active duty, complete15 years of active duty service, have a DIEMS (the date an individual was initially enlisted, inducted or appointed in a Regular or Reserve Component of a uniformed service) of 1 August 1986 or later, and qualify under service regulations for retention to 20 years of active duty service.

6. Her DIEMS, as shown on that form, is 1 March 1987; the date of notification, 28 November 2001; the date of determination, 2 January 2002. She signed the form electing to receive the bonus on 11 December 2001.

7. U.S.C. 37, Section 322, provides for a 15-year career status bonus for members entering the service on or after 1 August 1986. It defines eligibility requirements for the bonus, which include – first becoming a member of a uniformed service serving on active duty on or after 1 August 1986, and completing 15 years of active duty (or has received notification not later than 180 days before the date on which the member will complete 15 years of active duty). The bonus is a single lump sum of $30,000.00.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. At the time of the applicant's election, she was not eligible for the CSB. She will not be eligible until this year (2003) for the CSB. The determination of her eligibility was more than likely erroneously made based on her DIEMS, not on her basic active service date, which would indicate her years of active service.


2. Accordingly, the Career Status Bonus Election (DA Form 2839) should be expunged from her OMPF. The election that she made on 11 December 2001 under the provisions of U.S.C. 37, Section 322, is null and void and of no force or effect.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election (DA Form 2839) be expunged from the applicant's OMPF. That election is null and void and of no force or effect.

BOARD VOTE:

__AAO__ __TAP __ __RWA__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __ Arthur A. Omartian_ ___
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002081828
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20030515
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 134.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083661C070212

    Original file (2003083661C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The G-1 recommends that administrative relief be granted in this case because the debts appear to have been incurred as a result of administrative oversights by military separation personnel and were not the fault of the applicant. The evidence also shows that the applicant’s ineligibility for the program is based on his DEP enlistment date being prior to the DIEMS date established as the eligibility date for the REDUX program. Therefore, it would be appropriate to void the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-0772

    Original file (BC-2006-0772.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant does not provide any information whether she inquired to her commander, Command Support Staff (CSS), or servicing Military Personnel Flight (MPF) regarding CSB eligibility at anytime in the past three years. DPPRR indicates if a member is not eligible or has not made an election for CSB by the 16th year of active service; the member remains in High-3/50% retirement plan and is no longer eligible for the CSB program. The CSB eligibility notification letter should have been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083653C070212

    Original file (2003083653C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum indicated that those soldiers who erroneously received the CSB did not initially enter military service on or after 1 August 1986; therefore under the law, they are not eligible to elect for the bonus or for participation in the REDUX that accompanied the CSB. In this, the DIEMS date is the date the soldier enlisted in the DEP, not the date the soldier came on active duty. Thus the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to void the applicant’s enlistment in the DEP on...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050011736

    Original file (20050011736.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's spouse provides, on behalf of the applicant, a general power of attorney; a DD Form 2839 (Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election); a Request for Personnel Action; an email dated 1 June 2004; an NGB Form 22-5- 4-E (Addendum to DD Form 4) dated 6 June 2004; release from active duty orders dated 11 June 2004; reassignment orders dated 23 March 2001; the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record); the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00848

    Original file (BC-2004-00848.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was never notified that he was eligible to elect the CSB. Note: DIEUS date was formally known as the Date Initially Entered Military Service (DIEMS) date. Applicant states he was denied an opportunity to render a CSB election, because he was not notified by Air Force officials of his CSB election window.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00319

    Original file (BC-2004-00319.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00319 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date Initially Entered Military Service (DIEMS) be changed from 7 February 1986 to 11 September 1986. On 7 May 2002, he received notification that due to problems with the military personnel data system at the time of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01125

    Original file (BC-2005-01125.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request applicant provided a personal statement, DD Form 2839, Career Status Bonus Election, an email associated with his application for the CSB, a copy of DD Form 2789, Waiver/Remission of Indebtedness Application, and background information associated with his application for waiver/remission of indebtedness. Subsequent to receiving the CSB, he was notified that since his DIEMS/DIEUS date was before 1 August 1986, he was never eligible for the program and the money paid...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009803

    Original file (20110009803.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the date on his DD Form 2839 (Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election) be changed thereby allowing him to receive a CSB. Army Regulation 600-8-7 (Retirement Services Program), Section IV clearly stated that eligible Soldiers have 6 months from the date of notification to decide to either remain under the High-3 retirement plan or elect CSB/REDUX [Reduced Retired]; c. the applicant was informed that if the date of election on his form was correct, his election was past the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00315

    Original file (BC-2006-00315.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to an Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) staff inquiry to the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) requesting a copy of the CSB notification letter to the applicant - AFPC/DPPRR has indicated that they requested the applicant’s base to review the applicant’s records and provide them a copy of the CSB notification letter that was sent to the applicant; however, they were unable to provide a copy of the notification letter. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086728C070212

    Original file (2003086728C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this, the DIEMS date is the date the soldier enlisted in the DEP, not the date the soldier came on active duty. The evidence also shows that the applicant’s ineligibility for the program is based on her DEP enlistment date being prior to the DIEMS date established as the eligibility date for the REDUX program. Therefore, it would be appropriate to void the applicant’s enlistment in the DEP on 31 July 1986, correct her DIEMS date to 16 September 1986, the date she entered active duty in...