| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member | ||
| Mr. Ronald J. Weaver | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted a waiver of the promotion civilian education requirement.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was unable to complete his civilian education prior to the convening date of the promotion board. He claims that his civilian job as an air traffic controller requires a considerable amount of time and training in order to stay current, and he was also required to attend courses out of state. He further states that the operational tempo of his Reserve unit over the past several years has greatly increased, which placed a high demand on his available time, but he was still able to complete his military education requirement in 2001. He also comments that he has undergone at least 15 procedures since being diagnosed with cancer four years ago, which also took up time that could have been used to complete his civilian education. However, he was able to complete his civilian education on 31 March 2002, and he immediately sent this documentation to his career branch for submission to the promotion board. In support of his application, he provides copies of his officer evaluation reports (OERs) from 1997 through 2001, his Military Police Officer Advanced Course (MPOAC) diploma, his Combined Arms and Services Staff School (CAS3) diploma, and his Bachelor of Business Administration Diploma Certificate from Concordia College.
4. The applicant’s military records show that as of the date of his application, he was still serving as a captain (CPT) in the United States Army Reserve (USAR).
5. The applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to major (MAJ) by both the 2001 and 2002 Department of the Army (DA), Reserve Component (RC), MAJ, Promotion Selection Boards.
6. The OERs provided by the applicant confirm that in the four reports he received between November 1997 and September 2001, he was placed in the top block of all categories. The raters placed him in the outstanding must promote block on all reports, and the senior raters all placed him in the best qualified block, and he received above center of mass evaluations on all reports.
7. The applicant provided documents confirming that he completed the MPOAC on 3 November 1995; the CAS3 on 28 July 2001; and that he was awarded a Bachelor of Business Administration Degree on 31 March 2002.
8. During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was received from the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, RC, U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), St. Louis, Missouri, dated 11 February 2003. It indicates that the applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to MAJ by both the 2001 and 2002 DA, RC, Promotion Selections Boards. This RC promotion official states that the applicant’s record did not contain evidence showing that he completed an officer advanced course and a baccalaureate degree. Subsequent evidence was provided that showed that he completed the advanced course. However, this evidence also confirmed that he did not complete his baccalaureate degree until 31 March 2002, after the 2002 promotion board convened on 4 March 2002. The opinion further states that by law, members must complete the civilian education requirement prior to the convening date of the promotion board. As a result, RC promotion officials do not have the authority to grant the applicant an education waiver.
9. However, the PERSCOM RC promotion official does state that although his office lacks the authority to grant the education waivers for civilian education, based on the information furnished by the applicant and the fact that he completed the civilian education requirement in 2002, he recommends a waiver of the civilian education requirement be provided by this Board.
10. On 12 March 2003, the applicant was provided a copy of the PERSCOM advisory opinion in order to have the opportunity to respond. To date, he has failed to reply.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s request that he be granted an education waiver, and it carefully considered the factors he presented with his case. The Board finds these factors are sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.
2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant completed his military education requirement for promotion, and that he was awarded his baccalaureate degree in the same month that the 2002 DA, RC, MAJ, Promotion Selection Board convened. Further, PERSCOM, St. Louis, promotion officials recommend the applicant be granted a waiver of the civilian education requirement. Thus, the Board finds it would serve the interest of equity and justice to grant the requested relief.
3. In view of the facts of this case, the Board finds that it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to show that he completed his civilian education requirement prior to the convening date of the 2002 DA, RC, MAJ, Promotion Selection Board.
4. The Board also concludes that it would be appropriate to place the applicant’s corrected record, showing that he satisfied all military and civilian education requirements before a Special Selection Board (SSB) for consideration for promotion to MAJ under the criteria used by the 2002 DA, RC, MAJ, Promotion Selection Board. Further, the Board finds that if he is selected for promotion by the SSB, his promotion effective date and date of rank to MAJ should be established as the date he would have originally been promoted had he been originally selected by the 2002 promotion board, and he should be provided any back pay and allowances due as a result.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned had completed all military and civilian education requirements for promotion to MAJ prior to the convening date of the 2002 DA, RC, MAJ, Promotion Selection Board; by placing his corrected record before a SSB for consideration for promotion to MAJ under the criteria used by the 2002 DA, RC, MAJ, Promotion Selection Board; and if selected for promotion by the SSB, by establishing his promotion effective date and date of rank as the date he would have been promoted had he been originally selected by the 2002 promotion board, and providing him any back pay and allowances due as a result.
BOARD VOTE:
___hbo__ __rjw ___ __wtm __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Walter T. Morrison____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002079548 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/04/17 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | N/A |
| DISCHARGE REASON | N/A |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 1043 | 131.1100 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077963C070215
The applicant further states that under the provisions of the ROPMA, any officer appointed to the grade of captain (CPT) before 1 October 1995 is granted an exception to the civilian education requirement for promotion to MAJ. However, given the specificity of the civilian education exception granted to officers appointed to the grade of CPT before 1 October 1995 by 10 USC 12205, and absent any grant of Secretarial discretion in this section of the law, the Board finds that the intent of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077003C070215
Although the applicant provided information to show he completed the OAC on 25 April 1997, this was after the convening date of the board, which was 11 March 1997. By regulation, an officer is required to meet the basic military education requirement for promotion prior to the convening date of the promotion board in order to be eligible for promotion selection by that board. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was considered and not selected for promotion by both the 1996...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079633C070215
The applicant requests, in an amended application dated 28 October 2002, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 5 March 2001, and that all documents and references to his twice being not selected for promotion to major (MAJ) be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states, in effect, that after being advised by the Board staff that the original relief being considered would...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100669C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she was promoted to major (MAJ) based on the criteria established by the 2003 Department of the Army (DA) MAJ Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB). However, the HRC advisory opinion also indicated that a clarification regarding civilian education was received that indicated that an officer promoted to CPT prior to 1 October 1995 does not require a Baccalaureate Degree to be promoted to MAJ. As a result, since the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073055C070403
He stated that the reason he was making the request was that even though he completed the degree requirements for a baccalaureate degree prior to the date the 1999 DA RC CPT promotion selection board convened, his degree was not formally conferred until 19 November 2000. But, in fact the applicant had worked very hard to complete the civilian education requirement before the selection board convened and that the only reason a copy of the degree was not available to the promotion board was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003080111C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, waiver of his military education requirement for promotion to major and appearance before a Special Selection Board (SSB). The evidence of record shows the applicant completed all requirements for his baccalaureate degree four months prior to the March 2001 RCSB; however, Excelsior University failed to confer the applicant's degree prior to the convening date of the March 2001 RCSB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077001C070215
It further states that the reasons for non-selection are usually unknown, but in this case, the applicant could not be selected for promotion based on the fact his record did not reflect that he had completed the required civilian education by the convening date of the boards. Therefore, notwithstanding the recommendation of PERSCOM, St. Louis, RC promotion officials, the Board concludes that it would be unjust to deny the applicant promotion reconsideration based on the technicality that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015450
The applicant states, in effect, that his non-selection for promotion from captain (CPT) to MAJ was based on him not having a bachelors degree, which was unjust given the governing law provided an exception to the civilian education requirement for promotion to MAJ for members who were promoted to CPT before 1 October 1995. Section III of Army regulation 135-155 states that officers' records may be placed before a special selection board (SSB) when it is determined that their records were...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100126C070208
In order to do that, he enlisted in the ARNG in May 2002 in pay grade E-4. The applicant’s husband enlisted in the ARNG on 28 January 1982, was promoted to pay grade E-5, and was honorably discharged from his enlisted status on 29 June 1984 due to his appointment as a second lieutenant the following day. As a result, the Board recommends that all Alabama Army National Guard records, the National Guard Bureau records, and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069404C070402
She was promoted to captain on 26 May 1993 and her first mandatory board consideration for major was in March 2000; she was non-selected for not meeting the military or civilian education requirements of completion of an OAC or having completed a baccalaureate degree by the convening date of the board. The Board concludes in this case that based on the education waiver previously granted to her on 24 October 2001, the applicant is entitled to promotion reconsideration to major under 2001...