Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077963C070215
Original file (2002077963C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 1 July 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002077963

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Ted Kanamine R Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted the civilian education waiver for promotion to major (MAJ) authorized by law.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that after reviewing the guidelines given to the selection boards in the years 2000 and 2001, the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), and speaking with officials of the Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), St. Louis, Missouri, Reserve Component (RC) promotions office, he believes the Promotion Selection Boards (PSB) were not given all the necessary information for selecting officers for promotion to MAJ in the years 2000 and 2001. He claims that according to the Department of the Army (DA) notification of promotion status memorandum, dated 7 March 2000, he was not selected for promotion to MAJ because the requirement for civilian education cannot be waived. He states this was also a factor during his promotion consideration in the year 2001. The applicant further states that under the provisions of the ROPMA, any officer appointed to the grade of captain (CPT) before 1 October 1995 is granted an exception to the civilian education requirement for promotion to MAJ. In support of his application, he provides PERSCOM promotion status notification memoranda for the 2000 and 2001 PSBs, and an extract of the ROPMA book, dated 11 September 1995.

4. The applicant’s military records show that while serving as a CPT in the Hawaii Army National Guard (HIARNG) he was considered and not selected for promotion by both the 2000 and 2001 DA RC MAJ PSBs.

5. On 10 August 2000, PERSCOM, St. Louis, published a memorandum notifying the applicant that he had been considered and not selected for promotion to MAJ by the 2000 DA RC PSB. This memorandum further indicated that the applicant’s records did not indicate that he had completed the required civilian and/or military education requirement by the date the PSB convened.

6. On 26 July 2001, PERSCOM, St. Louis, published a second promotion status memorandum that notified the applicant that he had been considered and not selected for promotion to MAJ by the 2001 PSB. It further indicated that the PSB had examined the performance portion of the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) according to the instructions provided by the Secretary of the Army.

7. The applicant submitted a promotion status inquiry to promotion officials at PERSCOM, St. Louis, and on 28 June 2002, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, RC, PERSCOM, St. Louis responded to his letter. The response indicated that the reasons for non-selection are usually unknown because statutory requirements prevent disclosure of promotion board proceedings. However, in the applicant’s case, he could not be selected because his records did not reflect that he had completed the required civilian education by the convening date of either the 2000 or 2001 PSBs.
8. The Chief Special Actions Branch memorandum further indicated that there were no provisions for waiving the civilian education requirement, and based on the Memorandum of Instructions for the 2000 and 2001 promotion boards, officers were required to meet the civilian education requirement prior to the convening date of the boards. Finally, it indicated that since the applicant was not educationally qualified, he did not have a basis for a Special Selection Board (SSB).

9. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, RC, PERSCOM, St. Louis. It indicated that in the applicant’s case, he could not be promoted based on the fact that his record did not reflect completion of the required civilian education (Bachelor’s Degree). It further indicated that there are no provisions to waive the civilian education requirement, and the applicant was provided a copy of Memorandum of Instructions (MOI) for both the 2000 and 2001 PSBs, which contained the guidance provided to the promotion boards by the Secretary of the Army. The MOIs stated that if an officer was appointed on or after 1 October 1987, he/she must possess a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution no later than the convening date of the promotion board. The applicant was appointed on 13 May 1988; therefore, he was required to have the degree in order to qualify for promotion.

10. On 12 February 2003, the applicant was provided a copy of the PERSCOM, St. Louis, advisory opinion in order to have the opportunity to respond. To date, he has failed to reply.

11. Title 10 of the United States Code, section 12205 (10 USC 12205) provides the legal criteria for the appointment education requirement for commissioned officers. It provides a general policy that states that no person may be appointed to a grade above the grade of first lieutenant in the Army Reserve, Air Force Reserve, or Marine Corps Reserve or to a grade above the grade of lieutenant (junior grade) in the Naval Reserve, or be federally recognized in a grade above the grade of first lieutenant as a member of the Army National Guard or Air National Guard, unless that person has been awarded a baccalaureate degree by a qualifying educational institution. Paragraph B provides exceptions to this education criteria. It specifically provides an exception to the education requirement that allows for the appointment to or recognition in a higher grade of any person who was appointed to, or federally recognized in, the grade of captain or, in the case of the Navy, lieutenant before October 1, 1995.

12. Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes policy and procedures used for selecting and promoting commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) of the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and of commissioned and warrant officers (WO) of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).
13. Paragraph 2-9 contains the civilian education requirement for promotion. It states that effective 1 October 1995, no person may be selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of CPT unless, not later than the day before the selection board convene date, that person has been awarded a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution recognized by the Secretary of Education or, within the
3 years preceding promotion, the officer has earned a baccalaureate degree from an unaccredited educational institution that has been recognized by the Department of Defense (DOD) for purposes of meeting officer educational requirements.

14. Paragraph 2-9b states that the baccalaureate degrees required for Reserve promotion to MAJ or above, must be completed not later than the day before the selection board convene date. Paragraph 2-9b(1) provides that all commissioned officers not previously appointed to or Federally recognized in the grade of CPT before 1 October 1995 must meet the baccalaureate degree requirement; and paragraph 2-9b(2) states that all commissioned officers initially appointed on or after 1 October 1987 must possess a baccalaureate degree.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he be provided an exception to the civilian education requirement for promotion to MAJ by law, and it finds this claim has merit.

2. The Board carefully considered the position taken in the PERSCOM,
St. Louis, advisory opinion, which rests its conclusions on the regulatory guidance and instructions to the PSBs, which indicate that all officers appointed after 1 October 1987 are required to meet the civilian education requirement for promotion. It finds this information and logic is sound absent the specific exception granted in 10 USC 12205.

3. The Board recognizes the broad latitude and discretionary authority provided to the Department in establishing promotion criteria and policy. However, given the specificity of the civilian education exception granted to officers appointed to the grade of CPT before 1 October 1995 by 10 USC 12205, and absent any grant of Secretarial discretion in this section of the law, the Board finds that the intent of this law was clearly to provide a blanket waiver of the civilian education requirement to all officers in this category.

4. In view of the facts of this case, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to show that he was granted an exception to the civilian education requirement for promotion to MAJ and by placing his record before a SSB for promotion reconsideration to MAJ under the criteria used by the 2000 and 2001 DA RC MAJ PSBs.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was granted an exception to the civilian education requirement for promotion to major, and by submitting his corrected record to a duly constituted Special Selection Board for promotion consideration to major under the criteria followed by the 2000 and 2001 DA RC MAJ Promotion Selection Boards.

2. If selected for promotion by the Special Selection Board, the record of the individual concerned should be corrected by expunging all references to his
non-selection for promotion, by establishing his MAJ promotion effective date and date of rank as if he had been originally selected by either the 2000 or 2001 Promotion Selection Board, whichever is appropriate, and by providing him all back pay and allowances due as a result.

BOARD VOTE:

_KF___ __MM__ _TK___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ____ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Ted S. Kanamine
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002077963
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/05/DD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE N/A
DATE OF DISCHARGE N/A
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY N/A
DISCHARGE REASON N/A
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 310 131.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015450

    Original file (20080015450.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his non-selection for promotion from captain (CPT) to MAJ was based on him not having a bachelor’s degree, which was unjust given the governing law provided an exception to the civilian education requirement for promotion to MAJ for members who were promoted to CPT before 1 October 1995. Section III of Army regulation 135-155 states that officers' records may be placed before a special selection board (SSB) when it is determined that their records were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100669C070208

    Original file (2004100669C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she was promoted to major (MAJ) based on the criteria established by the 2003 Department of the Army (DA) MAJ Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB). However, the HRC advisory opinion also indicated that a clarification regarding civilian education was received that indicated that an officer promoted to CPT prior to 1 October 1995 does not require a Baccalaureate Degree to be promoted to MAJ. As a result, since the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005898

    Original file (20120005898.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Because this regulatory degree requirement did not provide an exception for officers who were appointed to the rank of CPT before 1 October 1995, it failed to implement the baccalaureate degree exception that is required by Title 10, USC, section 12205(b)4. c. The SSB recommended him for promotion to MAJ and informed him that he had one of the following options depending on his current status: * if he had been discharged or retired, he could request voidance of the discharge or retirement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015173

    Original file (20080015173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing the entire record, if an SSB does not recommend for promotion an officer whose name was referred to it for consideration, the officer shall be considered to have failed of selection for promotion by the board which did consider the officer. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was in fact considered by a Special Selection Board under the 2002 criteria as directed by the settlement agreement; however, he was not selected for promotion. By regulation, the effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000512

    Original file (20090000512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He claims he resigned his commission so he would not be a non-select by an Army board and have a break in service. Chapter 9, Table 9-1 provides the regulatory civilian education requirements and states, in pertinent part, that a commissioned officer who received an initial appointment after 30 September 1983, who has no commissioned officer service before that date, must obtain a baccalaureate degree in order to qualify for promotion to the rank of major. The evidence of record confirms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010577

    Original file (20080010577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 September 2007, the National Guard Bureau, Arlington, Virginia, published Orders 257-5, honorably discharging the applicant from the ARNG, effective 9 July 2007, and terminating her Reserve of the Army and Army of the United States appointments. On 13 May 2008, by memorandum, the applicant requested a waiver of the statutory education requirements for promotion to CPT. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079548C070215

    Original file (2002079548C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion further states that by law, members must complete the civilian education requirement prior to the convening date of the promotion board. In view of the facts of this case, the Board finds that it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to show that he completed his civilian education requirement prior to the convening date of the 2002 DA, RC, MAJ, Promotion Selection Board. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077001C070215

    Original file (2002077001C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It further states that the reasons for non-selection are usually unknown, but in this case, the applicant could not be selected for promotion based on the fact his record did not reflect that he had completed the required civilian education by the convening date of the boards. Therefore, notwithstanding the recommendation of PERSCOM, St. Louis, RC promotion officials, the Board concludes that it would be unjust to deny the applicant promotion reconsideration based on the technicality that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012724

    Original file (20070012724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a memorandum, dated 23 September 1999, which appointed him as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army; two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which covered his active duty service from 11 September 1999 to 15 December 1999 and from 16 January 2003 to 23 May 2004; certificates awarding him the Air Medal and the Bronze Star Medal; a memorandum, dated 2 February 2006, which informed the applicant that he was selected for promotion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079633C070215

    Original file (2002079633C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in an amended application dated 28 October 2002, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 5 March 2001, and that all documents and references to his twice being not selected for promotion to major (MAJ) be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states, in effect, that after being advised by the Board staff that the original relief being considered would...