| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann | Member | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an
honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That his discharge was in error. He had a drinking problem that led to his actions and separation. He is proud of his service and would like to be just as proud of his discharge. In support of his application, he submits copies of his: DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States); two character reference letters; and a letter from the City-County Bureau of Identification (CCBI).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show he enlisted on 5 May 1992, as a cannon fire directions specialist, for a period of 4 years. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-4 effective 1 March 1995.
The applicant was barred from reenlistment on 29 October 1995 for involvement in an alcohol related incident.
He was convicted by a general court-martial on 5 December 1995, of violations of two lawful regulations, assault with a dangerous weapon, drunk and disorderly conduct, wrongfully and willfully discharging a firearm, and of communicating a threat to another service member. His sentence consisted of a reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, a forfeiture of pay, confinement for 12 months, and a bad conduct discharge.
His commander reviewed the applicant's bar to reenlistment during the month of January 1996 with the recommendation that the applicant’s bar remain in effect.
On 6 March 1996, the Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) prepared a post-trial recommendation. The SJA listed the applicant's charges and indicated that the applicant had received a field grade Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, on 15 February 1994, which was unavailable for review by this Board. The SJA recommended that the applicant's sentence be approved. The general court-martial authority approved the sentence on 22 March 1996.
His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows that he was in confinement from 5 December 1995 to 17 September 1996 (286 days).
On 5 August 1997, the Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority.
On 20 February 1998, orders were published confirming the applicant's sentence. It also indicated that the portion of the sentence pertaining to confinement had been served.
On 8 May 1998, the applicant was discharged from the Army pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial and was issued a bad conduct discharge.
He had served 5 years, 7 months, and 2 days of creditable service and had
286 days of lost time due to confinement.
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 24 September 1999. However, his case was ineligible for review by the ADRB due to his conviction by a general court-martial.
The applicant provided two character references letters, which stated that he is a valuable employee, dedicated and devoted, performed a variety of different jobs, and has excellent work habits. The CCBI indicated that no local arrest information was found on the applicant.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-11 of that regulation provides that a soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence duly executed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant has provided no evidence to show that his discharge was unjust. He also has not provided any evidence sufficient to mitigate the character of his discharge.
2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged.
Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulation.
3. The Board notes the applicant's character references that stated he was a valuable employee, dedicated and devoted, performed a variety of different jobs, and had excellent work habits. It was also noted that no local arrest information was found on the applicant. However, this evidence is insufficient to support his request for an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__sc____ ___pm___ ___ra___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002079155 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030403 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19980508 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, CHAP 3 SEC IV |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 30 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091330C070212
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 25 April 1997, the applicant was discharged from the Army pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial and was issued a bad conduct discharge. It is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005975
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 30 October 1995, the convening authority approved the sentence as provided for reduction to the grade of E-1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for 11 months and a bad conduct discharge. On 16 April 1996, the United...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080880C070215
and recommended a general discharge. The immediate commander again recommended approval of the applicant's request with a general discharge. On 1 November 1973 the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request to upgrade the discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102015C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, to correct his records by upgrading his bad conduct discharge to an honorable discharge. Counsel requests that the applicant be given a second chance by granting an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00497
The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 911119: Joined Navy Brig, Naval Station, Long Beach, California for confinement.911209: From confinement; to appellate leave.941223: NMCCA: The findings of guilty and sentence, as approved on review, are affirmed950501: SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, Bad Conduct discharge ordered executed. After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017434
On 29 March 1985, the United States Army Court of Military Review considered the record of trial in the applicant's case. At issue before the Court was whether the military judge erred by considering, during sentencing, portions of a record of trial from a prior general court-martial of the applicant. The applicant contends that his dishonorable discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions because he was introduced to drugs and alcohol by Soldiers...
CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2002-157
§ 362 provides that the Secretary determines what grade an enlisted member should be retired in, Article 12.C.15.e. Although the convening authority of a court- martial may approve or mitigate a reduction in grade ordered by court-martial, the sec- ond sentence of that Article shows that the convening authority does not make the final determination of the member’s grade upon retirement. While the convening authority determines the member’s sentence, Article 12.C.15.g.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01365 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: RONALD SMALL HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded and he be allowed to retire in the grade of master sergeant. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003887
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003887 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 615-364 (Discharge, Dishonorable and Bad Conduct), in effect at the time, stated that when authorized, an enlisted person would be discharged with a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial imposing a bad conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019529
His reasons for requesting a change in his discharge are that he was treated disparately and was subjected to selective prosecution, he had ineffective assistance of counsel at his court-martial, he never received a proper review of his clemency matters by the general court-martial convening authority (GCMCA), he was a victim of ineffective assistance of counsel at the appellate level, and the purpose of the bad conduct discharge has been served. The applicant served as a PSG and Battle NCO...