| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | |
| Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her reentry eligibility (RE) code of RE-3 be changed to a code of RE-1.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that at the time of separation, she was told that she would be able to reenlist in any branch of the military that she desired. She also states that serving in the Air Force has been her dream since age 4. She would like the opportunity to make her family proud while serving her country and fulfilling her dream.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
That on 14 September 2001, she enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program (DEP). On 24 October 2001, she was discharged from the DEP and she enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years and training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 14T (Patriot Missile Crewman) and assignment to Europe upon completion of all training.
On 20 November 2001, while assigned to Fort Jackson, South Carolina for basic training, the applicant underwent a mental status evaluation. She expressed depressive symptoms related to partner relational stressors outside the training environment. In addition, she was concerned about the welfare of her children. She believed they were living in an unsafe environment and that some abuse and or neglect may have been taking place.
The examining official believed that the applicant would continue to be a training distraction until her personal issues were resolved. There were no immediate concerns, but the applicant had a history of suicidal ideation/gestures during adolescence and there was a possibility she would act out if retained. The applicant's behavior was determined to be normal; she was fully alert and fully oriented. Her mood and affect were depressed; her thinking process was clear; her thought content was normal; and her memory was good. The applicant was diagnosed to suffer from an adjustment disorder with depressed mood. She had partner relational problems and it was believed that she had no potential for further military service. The recommendation was that the applicant be expeditiously separated under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, to prevent an unsafe training environment. The evaluating official determined that no treatment was deemed necessary and recommended increased supervision of the applicant "(buddy watch)."
On an unknown date, the applicant's unit commander notified her that he was initiating a separation action to separate her under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, due to entry-level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized discharge. She was also advised of her rights and of the impact of the discharge action. The applicant acknowledged notification, waived legal representation and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.
On an unknown date, the approval authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated with an uncharacterized discharge.
On 5 December 2001, the applicant was separated under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, due to entry-level performance and conduct. Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows that she had completed 1 month and 12 days of creditable active military service and that she was assigned an RE code of RE-3.
Pertinent Army Regulations provide that, prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. AR 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlisting and processing into the RA and the eligibility for prior service applicant's for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes and RA RE codes.
A code of RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service; however, the disqualification is waivable. Discharge by reason of a personality disorder under the provisions of chapter 5, AR 635-200 requires an RE code of RE-3.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11 of that regulation provides for the separation of personnel during the initial 180 days of service while still in an entry-level status. The policy applies to soldiers who have demonstrated that they are not qualified for retention because they cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline. These soldiers are given an uncharacterized discharge and, when discharged under the provisions of chapter 11, are discharged by reason of entry-level status performance and conduct. Only in certain meritorious cases approved by the Secretary of the Army are they entitled to an honorable discharge. An RE code of RE-3 is mandated.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The available records show that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, due to entry-level performance and conduct and assigned an RE-3 code. This code applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable as determined by enlistment officials and the needs of the Army. The applicant should contact her local recruiter, they are better able to determine the Army's needs and they are qualified to process a request for a waiver when it is deemed appropriate.
3. In view of the circumstances in this case, the assigned RE code was, and is, still appropriate. The applicant has submitted no evidence that her RE code is in error or should be changed.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__lls___ __cjp___ __kwl___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002077744 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030320 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 20011205 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200, Chap 11 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A25.03 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.2503 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03087163C070212
He stated that her refusal to respond to counseling and corrective training demonstrated that she lacked motivation, and that her performance and behavior had not improved. The applicant's commanding officer informed the applicant that he was recommending that she be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, entry-level status performance and conduct. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013201
On 1 October 1997, the unit commander informed the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 11-2c, failure to adapt to a military environment with a recommendation for an ELS performance and conduct separation uncharacterized service. The evidence of record shows he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 11, entry level performance and conduct with an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104752C070208
On 4 December 2000, the unit commander counseled the applicant and notified her of his intent to initiate separation action under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200 with an uncharacterized discharge for entry-level performance and conduct. On 18 February 2004, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. Pertinent Army regulations provide that, prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006420
On 22 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations) by reason of entry-level status, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 29 June 2007, the applicant was discharged by reason of entry-level status after completing 5 months and 27 days of active military service. A separation code of "JGA" applies to persons who are separated under the provisions of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080424C070215
The regulation states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives),...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005664
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 October 2010, for a period of 4 years and 23 weeks. On 16 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with an uncharacterized separation of service. It further states that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000255
The examining official recommended her administrative discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 11. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Personnel separated under this provision will be separated with their service uncharacterized.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099323C070212
On 9 January 2002 the applicant's commander recommended that the applicant be administratively separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 11, for entry level status performance and conduct as a result of her acute stress disorder. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE Codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Those individuals can best advise a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018770
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. She was prescribed medication, placed on a profile with a follow-up in 3 to 5 days. She further stated her understanding that if the separation authority approved her separation, she would receive an uncharacterized discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017271
On 2 February 1999, the applicant's company commander notified him that she was recommending that the applicant be separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 due to his lack of motivation and diagnosis of adjustment disorder. It states that the SPD code JGA is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, by reason of entry level performance and conduct. Army Regulation 635-200...