| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous application to correct his military records to show that he was separated with a military occupational specialty (MOS) of 76Y30 vice 76Y10. He submits additional documents from his military personnel file which reflect his MOS as 76Y30 at the time of his separation.
3. The Memorandum of Consideration (MOC) of the Board’s 26 February 2002 review of the case (AR2001060607) is incorporated herein by reference as if wholly set forth. The applicant’s submission is a new argument that requires Board consideration.
4. The applicant's military personnel file indicates he enlisted for training in MOS 76Y30, was awarded that specialty in July 1973 following completion of training, promoted in that specialty in April 1974, tested in that specialty in 1974 and 1975 and performed duties in that specialty throughout the duration of his enlistment. The only two documents in his file which reflect that his MOS was 76Y10 was the 1976 order releasing the applicant from active duty and his 1976 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).
5. In 1977 the 76 (Supply) Career Management Field (CMF) was revised in support of the Enlisted Personnel Management System (EPMS). Under EPMS all military occupational specialties were reconfigured to reflect a fixed grade-skill level relationship (i.e. skill level 1-pay grade E-4 and below, skill level 2-pay grade E-5, skill level 3-pay grade E-6, etc.). Prior to the 1977 CMF revision a soldier serving in specialty 76Y30 was not an indication of the individual's pay grade.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence available to the Board confirms that the applicant did in fact hold MOS 76Y30 at the time of his separation from active duty in 1976. His CMF was not reconfigured to reflect the grade/skill level relationship until 1977, after the applicant was released from active duty.
2. The Board concludes there is sufficient evidence to confirm that the applicant's 1976 separation document should reflect that he was separated in MOS 76Y30 vice 76Y10.
3. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusion, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below would correct an error.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that he individual concerned was separated in MOS 76Y30 vice 76Y10.
BOARD VOTE:
__FNE __ __SLP __ __EJA___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Fred N. Eichorn______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2002077672 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | 20021022 |
| DATE BOARDED | |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002646C070206
It is probable, because the MOS realignment action was only a few months old at the time the applicant's Application for Voluntary Retirement was prepared, that an incorrect MOS was entered on the form. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 31 August 1978; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 30 August 1981. The Board determined that the evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060607C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be changed to show the correct skill level for his military occupational specialty (MOS). DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005626
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From Active Duty) be corrected to show his primary military occupational specialty code (PMOSC) as 31S3H and his secondary military occupational specialty code (SMOSC) of 31B3O. During his IADT period, the applicant completed training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of 31S, Field General Communications Security (COMSEC) Repairman. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows award of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017854
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the military occupational specialty (MOS) that is recorded on his discharge document. The applicants military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and entered active duty on 31 December 1970. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show PMOS 76V4O because he was awarded the PMOS when he was promoted to the rank of SGT (E-5) on 4 April 1975.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005381
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) dated 7 April 1977 to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B4O instead of 11B2O. For an enlisted Soldier, the entry shows the first 5 characters of the primary and/or secondary MOS code which includes the 3 characters of the MOS, the fourth character of skill and grade level in the MOS, and the fifth character of a special qualification identifier (SQI), if applicable. The evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000942
The instructions for item 11 specify to enter the MOS codes, titles, years, and months for enlisted personnel and all additional MOS's served for a period of 1 year or more. Although there are no orders awarding the applicant MOS 11E, the evidence of record shows he successfully completed Basic Armor OSUT. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 11 of his 17 December 1979 DD Form 214 to show the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011784
The applicant requests correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 63B2O, and his last unit of assignment as the 227th General Supply Company. The EPMS requires that the MOS skill level (fourth character) be in agreement with the individual's rank and pay grade. There is no available evidence of record, or evidence provided by the applicant, showing that he is entitled to any award not already...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008735
Skill level 1 identifies positions authorized in pay grades E-3 and E-4; skill level 2 identifies positions authorized in grade E-5; skill level 3 identifies positions authorized in pay grade E-6; skill level 4 identifies positions authorized in pay grade E-7; and skill level 5 identifies positions authorized in pay grades E-8 and E-9. There is no evidence of record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to support his contention that he awarded a 91C3O PMOS while he was in the Army....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003181
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of the title of his military occupational specialty (MOS) in Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from 42A3O Human Resources Specialist to "42A4O Senior Human Resources Training Management Noncommissioned Officer (NCO). 2. The evidence of record shows that the correct title associated with MOS 42A...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064619C070421
He states that his dates of service on his 1984 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) are incorrect. The applicant's existing military personnel file, which appears to have been created in 1987 when he returned to active duty for a third time, also contains a DD Form 214 reflecting a period of active duty between 2 June 1977 and 1 September 1984. The evidence suggests the applicant likely was discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment on 1 June 1977...