Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077606C070215
Original file (2002077606C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 10 DECEMBER 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002077606


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Celia L. Adolphi Chairperson
Mr. Ted S. Kanamine Member
Mr. Conrad V. Meyer Member


         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, disability retirement benefits and pay retroactive to 1966. The applicant states, in effect, that he was medically retired in 1966 but has never been "paid retirement pay or benefits." In support of his request he submits a copy of his 1966 Department of Defense Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). He also submits a copy of his 1 July 1966 Temporary Disability Retirement orders, which he states was the last order he received.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He entered active duty on 30 January 1964. On 7 July 1966 the applicant was discharged from active duty and his name placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with entitlement to disability retired pay based on a 100 percent disability rating.

The applicant was periodically scheduled to have his medical condition re-evaluated and on examinations conducted in 1967 and 1968 it was determined that his medical condition had not stabilized and as such, his named remained on the TDRL.

During a December 1969 examination at Letterman General Hospital it was determined that his condition had stabilized for rating purposes and that his "tuberculous pleurisy" had resolved and that he had "been adequately treated with antituberculous drugs since January 1966" and that there had "been no x-ray change for a least five months."

An informal Physical Evaluation Board convened on 16 March 1970 and found the applicant fit for duty. The applicant concurred on 3 April 1970 and waived his right to a formal hearing.

His name was removed from the TDRL effective 31 July 1970.

In 1977 the applicant submitted a request to the Board to have his separation document changed to show that he had been released from active duty vice retired by reason of physical disability. The applicant acknowledged in that




correspondence that he "was temporary disabled but was found fit for active duty and taken off the disability list…." His application was closed administratively when the Board noted that "only administrative action is required to reply to his request concerning the reason for his separation."

Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 7-2, provides that an individual may be placed on the TDRL (for the maximum period of 5 years which is allowed by Title 10, United States Code, section 1210) when it is determined that the individual's physical disability is not stable and he or she may recover and be fit for duty, or the individual's disability is not stable and the degree of severity may change within the next 5 years so as to change the disability rating. While an individual's name remains on the TDRL they are entitled to monthly disability payments. Once their name is removed from the TDRL they are no longer entitled to monthly payments unless their medical condition is determined to be permanently disabling and rated at 30 percent or higher.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's name was removed from the TDRL in July 1970 when his medical condition stabilized and no longer rendered him unfit for military duties. As such the Board notes that the applicant's disability benefits would have terminated in 1970.

DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered in July 1970, the month in which the applicant was determined to be fit for military duties, his name was removed from the TDRL, and his disability benefits terminated. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired in July 1973.

The application is dated 29 July 2002 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's




entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.


BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__CLA __ __TSK __ __CVM__ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION



Carl W. S. Chun
Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002077606
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20021210
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 108.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004032C070205

    Original file (20060004032C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he was permanently retired from the Army by reason of disability. The applicant’s separation document is correct and the fact that he was subsequently permanently retired by reason of physical disability is not a basis to change his 1971 discharge from active duty. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010009

    Original file (20080010009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was considered by a PEB on 2 May 1975 and determined to be physically unfit with a combined rating of 100% disabled and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with reexamination in October 1976. The recommendation of the PEB was approved by the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) and, on 12 October 1978, Orders D199-17, published by the US Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, VA, removed him from the TDRL and discharged him from the Army because of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012502

    Original file (20080012502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he was retired due to permanent physical disability at the time of his removal from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show that he was retired due to permanent physical disability at the time of his removal from the TDRL. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000694C070206

    Original file (20050000694C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result of that examination, a PEB on 6 November 1978 determined that the applicant was physically unfit for military service and recommended that he be permanently retired with a 60 percent disability rating. A Soldier on the TDRL must undergo a periodic medical examination and PEB evaluation at least once every 18 months to decide whether a change has occurred in the disability for which the Soldier was temporarily retired. Nevertheless, the applicant was discharged from the Army on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017167

    Original file (20110017167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the addition of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the entry "Disability, Permanent" 2. Item 13 of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show the ARCOM. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008168C070208

    Original file (20040008168C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that a new separation document be issued showing that he has been permanently retired. The entries in item 23 and 28 on the applicant’s separation document are correct and the fact that he was subsequently permanently retired is not a basis to change the reason for his 1990 discharge from active duty. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 24 March 1995; therefore, the time for the applicant to file...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018879

    Original file (20080018879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he had completed 12 years, 5 months, and 27 days of creditable active military service. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 that is prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. Furthermore, the applicant did not perform any active service from the time he was placed on the TDRL to the time he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015648

    Original file (20110015648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on a review of the objective medical evidence of record and considering the physical requirements for reasonable performance of duties required of his grade and military specialty, the PEB found the applicant fit for duty within the limitations of his physical profile. Based on the review of the TDRL examination, the PEB found the applicant fit for duty and noted that: * There are presently no restrictions which would preclude the applicant from returning to military service and no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004690

    Original file (20130004690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If the Soldier meets the following criteria, the Soldier will be removed from the TDRL, permanently retired for physical disability, and entitled to receive disability retired pay: (a) the Soldier is unfit; (b) the disability causing the Soldier’s name to be placed on the TDRL has become permanent; and (c) the disability is rated at 30 percent or more under the VASRD, or the Soldier has at least 20 years of active Federal service. A Soldier will be removed from the TDRL and separated with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005881

    Original file (20070005881.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Fields Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The PEB determined that based on medical evidence, the applicant had physical limitations which precluded adequate performance of normal duties associated with his office, grade, rank or rating. The PEB further considered the applicant to have stabilized sufficiently for rating purposes and recommended the applicant's name be removed from the TDRL and the applicant be...