Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077452C070215
Original file (2002077452C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 4 February 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002077452

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Mr. Ronald J. Weaver Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge be upgraded.

APPLICANT STATES: He could not serve effectively because of his mental problems. He was seeking mental health treatment because of the death of his mother and his father's terminal illness. Now he gets help from Social Security and is receiving proper mental health treatment.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted and entered active duty on 15 October 1979. He completed basic combat training, advanced individual training as an infantryman, basic airborne training and approximately 7 months of service without a discreditable incident of record.

The applicant received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice on 22 May 1980 for possession of marijuana but progressed normally and was advanced to pay grade E-4 on 15 October 1981. On 13 November 1981 he received another NJP for absence from his appointed place of duty.

In January 1982 he commenced a series of absences without leave (AWOL) that led to his discharge.

On 10 June 1982, in accordance with his pleas, a special court-martial found him guilty of four specifications of AWOL (two of them for more than 30 days). The sentence; reduction to pay grade E-1, confinement for more that 75 days and a bad conduct discharge was approved as adjudged. The applicant was ultimately placed on involuntary excess leave.

The Army Court of Military Review (ACMR) considered the applicant's contention that his plea was improvident because he had been in the barracks part of the time he was charged with AWOL. The ACMR noted that the unit was in the field at the time and there was no indication that the rear echelon noncommissioned officer, who was aware of the applicant's presence, was also aware that he was supposed to be in the field. The findings and sentence were affirmed and the discharge was duly executed.

On 23 March 1993 the applicant was separated with a bad conduct discharge. He had 2 years, 11 months and 27 days of creditable service and 105 days AWOL.




DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

2. There is no available evidence to substantiate the applicant's contentions of mental health problems.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

MHM___ __CLG__ __RJW ___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002077452
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030204
TYPE OF DISCHARGE BCD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19830323
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY SPCMO
DISCHARGE REASON A68.00
BOARD DECISION (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. A93.21
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076226C070215

    Original file (2002076226C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He further states that he did not want to enlist at the time but had no choice under the circumstances. He also states that he was ill-prepared mentally to be in the Army and did not receive the medical assistance he needed at the time to deal with what he considered a miserable and depressing environment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090122C070212

    Original file (2003090122C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: He was sentenced to confinement for a period of 1 year, reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and a BCD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068916C070402

    Original file (2002068916C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011203

    Original file (20060011203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011203 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Evidence of record shows the applicant should have been discharged with a bad conduct discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11. The applicant’s record of service included, in addition to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021297

    Original file (20140021297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140021297 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that his case was an isolated incident and that there were no alcohol/drug treatment services available at the time of his service. Special Court-Martial Order Number 106, dated 3 August 1983, shows the convening authority approved the sentence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072540C070403

    Original file (2002072540C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Although the discharge packet is not of record, the evidence of record shows that the applicant again requested that he be discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071034C070402

    Original file (2002071034C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 February 1981 for a period of 3 years and assignment to Korea. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015000

    Original file (20070015000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his dishonorable discharge (DD) be upgraded to a general or an honorable discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant contends that his DD should be upgraded to a general or an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060704C070421

    Original file (2001060704C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 15 April 1983, the applicant was discharged with a BCD pursuant to his sentence by general court-martial. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000935

    Original file (20090000935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States), dated 24 November 2008; two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with effective dates of 30 July 1981 and 30 November 1988; and a five-page self-authored statement accompanied by 66 enclosures documenting her training, awards, achievements, and certifications earned during both her military service and after her discharge from...