Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077106C070215
Original file (2002077106C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 26 November 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002077106

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in the rank and pay grade of sergeant first class/E-7 (SFC/E-7).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he used a waiver to be promoted to
SFC/E-7 while serving as a GS-7. He states that he was promoted to SFC/E-7 and that he honorably held that rank and pay grade for 130 days. He states that he was not assigned to a SFC/E-7 position because in order to remain a GS-7 he had to agree to a rank reduction. In support of his application, he submits three Request and Authorization for TDY Travel Of DOD Personnel forms (DD Forms 1610).

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 20 January 1999, the applicant was honorably separated by reason of temporary disability and placed on the TDRL.

The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) confirms that he was promoted to the staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6) on 17 November 1991, and that was the highest rank he attained during his military service. In addition, his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that suggest that he was promoted to SFC/E-7, or that he was ever selected for and placed on a valid Department of the Army (DA) promotion standing list for that rank and pay grade.

Orders Number 197-01, dated 17 November 1991, issued by Department of the Army, 33rd Personnel Services Company, APO AE 09808, promoted the applicant to SSG/E-6, effective 17 November 1991.

Orders 137-013, dated 17 May 1993, issued by State Of New Jersey, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, authorized the applicant’s reduction from SSG/E-6 to sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5), effective 17 November 1991. The reason for reduction cited in these orders was that the applicant was in a
non-promotable status because he lacked the required National Agency Check required for promotion to SSG/E-6.

On 7 January 1999, Orders Number D249-20, published by the United States Army Military Personnel Center (MILPERCEN), directed the applicant’s relief from assignment and duty because of physical disability, and his retirement on 20 January 1999. These orders authorized his placement on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 on that date, and that he would be placed on the TDRL in that rank and pay grade.


The applicant provided three TDY forms, dated in 1995, which list his rank and pay grade as SFC/E-7. However, there are no orders, documents or forms on file in the applicant’s MPRJ that show he was ever selected for or promoted to SFC/E-7.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372(3) governs the grade upon retirement of any member retired for physical disability. This law provides, pertinently, that a member who is retired for physical disability, or whose name is placed on the TDRL is entitled to the highest temporary grade or rank in which he served satisfactorily as determined by the Secretary of the Armed Force from which he is retired.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he was promoted to and honorably served in the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7, and that he should have been placed on the TDRL in that rank and pay grade. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2. By law and regulation, members who are retired for physical disability are entitled to be placed on the TDRL in the highest temporary grade or rank in which he/she served satisfactorily. The evidence of record confirms that highest rank and pay grade the applicant held during his military service was SSG/E-6, and had been reduced from that rank and pay grade. The record also confirms that he was placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 based on this being the highest rank and pay grade he attained and in which he served.

3. In the opinion of the Board, notwithstanding the TDY forms he provided, the applicant has failed to provide sufficient independent evidence to support his claim that he was promoted to and satisfactorily served in the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7 prior to his disability processing. Thus, the Board concludes that he was appropriately placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 in accordance with the applicable law and regulation, and that there is insufficient evidence to support providing him the requested relief.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_ _SAC _ __RWA_ ___HOF__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002077106
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/11/26
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 129.0400
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001637C070205

    Original file (20060001637C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military service records, in conjunction with Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), confirmed that all of the authorized awards and decorations that the applicant is entitled to are recorded on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to the grade of rank of SFC (E-7) in May 2001. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002474

    Original file (20130002474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders 344-0089, dated 10 December 2010, published by Headquarters, Fort Bliss amended Orders 029-0019, dated 29 January 2010, by changing his retired grade of rank from SSG to SFC. Order Number D254-12, dated 10 September 2012, removed him from the TDRL on 10 September 2012, and on the date following he was permanently retired in the rank of SFC. The evidence of record shows the applicant was medically retired on 19 February 2010 and was placed on the TDRL in the rank of SSG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016000

    Original file (20130016000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, states any member of the Armed Forces who is retired for physical disability or whose name is placed on the TDRL, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: a. the grade in which he/she is serving on the date when his/her name was placed on the TDRL or on the date when retired; b. the highest temporary grade in which he/she served satisfactorily; c. the permanent regular grade to which he/she would have been promoted had it not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007930C070208

    Original file (20040007930C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states he was promoted in the US Air Force Reserve (USAFR) to the rank of Master Sergeant (MSGT/E-7) on 1 May 1992 and held that rank until he was honorably separated on 23 February 1998. The applicant's retired grade is currently E-5, but should be E-7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073229C070403

    Original file (2002073229C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It further indicated that by law, members who are retired by reason of physical disability are placed on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade they would have obtained had it not been for the disability. Further, the USAPDA advisory opinion confirms that it authorized the applicant’s placement on the Retired List as a SFC/E-7. By law, members retiring for physical disability should be retired in the rank to which they would have been promoted had it not been for the disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013524

    Original file (20100013524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 15 July 2010 to show his highest enlisted grade. As his physical condition was unfitting, the PEB recommended medical retirement with transfer to the TDRL. The governing regulation for the preparation of the DD Form 214 states the Soldier's grade, rate or rank will be the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010454

    Original file (20090010454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010454 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was placed on the SFC/E-7 promotion list prior to placement on the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL) on 19 July 2003. The applicant was in a promotable status on 18 July 2003 when he was retired and placed on the TDRL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100832C070208

    Original file (2004100832C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he satisfactorily served as a SFC/E-7 on active duty and he requests that his rank and pay grade on the Retired List be corrected to reflect the highest grade he held and in which he served on active duty, which was SFC/E-7. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000310

    Original file (20130000310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and retirement orders, physical disability information report, and acceptance notification of E-7 promotion. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (grade on retirement physical disability, members of the Armed Forces), states unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an armed force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015534

    Original file (20140015534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140015534 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, placement on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 vice staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. The BNCOC Phase I distance learning program was transformed into Advanced Leader Course (ALC) - CC delivered via blackboard starting on 1 October 2009.