Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013524
Original file (20100013524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013524 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 15 July 2010 to show his highest enlisted grade.

2.  The applicant states he was retired on 15 July 2010 and placed on the temporary disability retirement list (TDRL) in the grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6.  He states the highest enlisted rank/grade he held was sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7, which he held for more than 6 months in the Regular Army.

3.  He continued by stating that he researched Army Regulation 15-80 (Army Grade Determination Review Board and Grade Determinations), paragraph 3-3 (Physical Disability), that states his disability retirement packet should have gone to the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) to determine his highest enlisted grade satisfactorily held before he was separated and issued his DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant provides the following documentary evidence:

	a.  Orders 089-0901 issued by U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Fort Gordon, GA on 30 March 2010;

	b.  DD Form 214 with a separation date of 15 July 2010;


	c.  DD Form 214 with a separation date of 18 August 1999;

	d.  an excerpt from Army Regulation 135-180, paragraph 2-11 (Computation of Retired Pay);

	e.  an excerpt from Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 7-8 (Service Remaining Obligation);

	f.  an excerpt from Army Regulation 15-80, paragraph 3-3;

	g.  excerpts from the Fort Gordon manual for the physical disability evaluation system (PDES); and

	h.  an Ombudsman (Soldier and Family Advocate) for U.S. Army Medical Command inquiry to the Retirement Services Officer at Fort Gordon.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  With prior enlisted service in the Regular Army, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army on 3 March 1988 in military occupational specialty 95B (Military Police).  He served continuously on active duty until he was honorably discharge on 18 August 1999.  He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows in:

	a.  item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) the entry "SFC" (Sergeant First Class)

	b.  item 4b (Pay Grade) the entry "E7";

	c.  item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) the entry "1999  02  01"
(1 February 1999);

	d.  item 25 (Separation Authority) the entry "AR (Army Regulation) 635-40, paragraph 4-24B(3)";

	e.  item 27 (Reentry Code) the entry "3"; and

	f.  item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the entry "DISABILITY, SEVERANCE PAY."

2.  The applicant received a medical waiver from the Chief, Surgeon, National Guard Bureau (NGB), on 14 May 2007 for his history of low back pain and a lipid disorder.  

3.  On 17 May 2007, he enlisted in the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) for a 6-year period of service in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/
E-5.

4.  On 2 June 2008, he was ordered to active duty in support of contingency operations for active duty operational support (CO-ADOS) for 180 days with duty in Iraq.

5.  On 26 November 2008, he was retained on active duty to participate in the Reserve Component Warriors in Transition medical retention processing program for completion of medical care and treatment.

6.  On 1 February 2009, he was promoted to the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/grade E-6 by Orders 033-804, issued by the State of North Carolina, Joint Forces Headquarters, Raleigh, NC, dated 2 February 2009.

7.  On 4 March 2010, a physical evaluation board (PEB) found the applicant unfit for duty due to an anxiety disorder, not otherwise specified with co-morbid major depressive disorder following his Iraq deployment where he was awarded the Purple Heart and Combat Action Badge.  His condition was rated 50 percent (%) disabling.  He was also rated for residuals of traumatic brain injury, not otherwise classified based on an improvised explosive device injury in 2008.  For this condition, he was rated 40% disabled.  His overall combined disability rating for these two unfitting conditions was 70%.  As his physical condition was unfitting, the PEB recommended medical retirement with transfer to the TDRL.

8.  On 9 March 2010, the applicant concurred with the aforementioned findings and waived a formal hearing.

9.  On 17 March 2010, the appropriate approval authority at the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency approved the PEB findings and recommendations.

10.  Orders Number 089-0901, published by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Gordon, on 30 March 2010 retired the applicant effective 15 July 2010 and placed him on the TDRL effective 16 July 2010 in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6.

11.  Accordingly, he was issued a DD Form 214 showing he entered active duty on 19 June 2007 and he was honorably retired on 15 July 2010.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows in:

	a.  item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) the entry "SSG";

	b.  item 4b (Pay Grade) the entry "E6";
	c.  item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) the entry "2007  05  17" (17 May 2007);

	d.  item 18 (Remarks) the entry "DISCHARGED FROM ENLISTED STATUS IN THE RETIRED GRADE SSG."

12.  References:

	a.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 defines the grade upon retirement for physical disability or whose name is placed on the TDRL for members of Armed Forces.  The member is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: 

   	(1)  the grade or rank in which he is serving on the date when his name is placed on the TDRL;
    
   	(2)  the highest temporary grade or rank in which he served satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the Armed Force from which he is retired;
   
   	(3)  the permanent regular or reserve grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired and which was found to exist as a result of a physical examination; or 
   
   	(4)  the temporary grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired, if eligibility for that promotion was required to be based on cumulative years of service or years of service in grade and the disability was discovered as a result of a physical examination. 
   
	b.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), effective 30 September 2000, provided that a DD Form 214 must be prepared for all Soldiers at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.  This regulation establishes the standardization policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 to include the use of proper source documents in the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The source documents include the Soldier's enlisted record brief, separation approval authority documentation, separation order, and any other document authorized for filing in the Soldier's official military personnel file.  Further guidance provides that the Soldier's grade, 


rate or rank will be the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  As an operation of law, the applicant is entitled to a correction of his retirement orders to show he was placed on the TDRL in the retired grade of rank of SFC based on the highest rank he satisfactorily held.

2.  The applicant held the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 at the time of his retirement based on temporary disability.  The governing regulation for the preparation of the DD Form 214 states the Soldier's grade, rate or rank will be the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation.  Therefore, there is no basis for changing the rank/grade (items 4a and 4b) on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 July 2010.

3.  However, item 18 of the applicant's DD Form 214 contains the entry "DISCHARGED FROM ENLISTED STATUS IN THE RETIRED GRADE SSG."
It should read, "DISCHARGED FROM ENLISTED STATUS IN THE RETIRED GRADE SFC."

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the Individual concerned by corrected by amending Orders Number 089-0901 to show his retired grade of rank as SFC and amending item 18 of his DD Form 214 to read, "DISCHARGED FROM ENLISTED STATUS IN THE RETIRED GRADE SFC."

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 (items 4a and 4b) for the period ending 15 July 2010 to show his rank/grade as SFC/E-7.



      ___________X____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013524



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013524



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002474

    Original file (20130002474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders 344-0089, dated 10 December 2010, published by Headquarters, Fort Bliss amended Orders 029-0019, dated 29 January 2010, by changing his retired grade of rank from SSG to SFC. Order Number D254-12, dated 10 September 2012, removed him from the TDRL on 10 September 2012, and on the date following he was permanently retired in the rank of SFC. The evidence of record shows the applicant was medically retired on 19 February 2010 and was placed on the TDRL in the rank of SSG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006948

    Original file (20100006948.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to change his DD Form 214 to show he was separated from active duty due to a permanent disability. While the applicant was promoted to SFC, pay grade E-7, his promotion occurred after he was retired from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Showing he was placed on the TDRL on 17 November 1998 in pay grade E-7 * Showing he was placed on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000310

    Original file (20130000310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and retirement orders, physical disability information report, and acceptance notification of E-7 promotion. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (grade on retirement physical disability, members of the Armed Forces), states unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an armed force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005005

    Original file (20120005005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant retired on 27 January 2005. As such, his DD Form 214 correctly listed his rank/grade of SSG/E-6 and his retirement orders correctly retired him in the higher grade.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006746

    Original file (20140006746.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was retired on 25 September 2012, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24b(1), by reason of permanent disability. The evidence of record shows he was a promotable SFC as of 4 February 2011. Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 1-20a, states Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023034

    Original file (20110023034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders 311-0916, dated 7 November 2005, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Gordon, GA, retired her from active duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay effective 5 February 2006 and placed her on the TDRL in the rank of SGT effective 6 February 2006. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-20c, states that under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007507

    Original file (20070007507.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that her promotion was not received upon retirement according to AR 600-8-19, that she did not receive her award until after she retired, and that there is no disability rating identified on her DD Form 214. Orders 05-122, dated 23 August 2006, issued by the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri promoted the applicant from pay grade E-6 to pay grade E-7 with an effective date of rank of 23 August 2006. The evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030085

    Original file (20100030085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 26 October 2010, he was honorably retired and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) states, per the provisions of 10 USC 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. promoting him to SGT/E-5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016547

    Original file (20140016547.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Eustis, Military Personnel Division, Fort Eustis issued the following orders: * Orders 149-0011, dated 29 May 2009 - placed him on the Retired List by reason of permanent disability effective 28 July 2009. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be amended to show he was an SFC, pay grade E-7 with an effective date of grade of 27 July 2009. Showing he was promoted to SFC/pay grade E-7 effective 27 July 2009. b. Amending his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 27 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021470

    Original file (20100021470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), and 4b (Pay Grade) be corrected to show he retired in the highest grade held. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (Grade on retirement of members of the Armed Forces for physical disability) states unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an armed force who is retired for physical disability under...