Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member | |
Mr. Lawrence Foster | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his 2 May 1994 discharge be voided, that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve and that any debts incurred as a result of his receiving disability severance pay be forgiven.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was not properly counseled in regards to his options prior to his separation for physical disability. He further states that he appeared before a physical evaluation board (PEB) at Fort Lewis, Washington and was granted a disability rating of 20%. He was returned to Fort Carson, Colorado, for what he thought was a disability retirement; however, at the time of his separation he was given severance pay in the amount of $61,984.81 with no explanation of why he was receiving severance pay or the consequences of accepting severance pay. He continues by stating that he received his 20-year letter from the National Guard and attempted to get identification cards. However, he was informed that he was not entitled to any benefits and could not receive retired pay unless his severance pay was paid back. He also states that he has received a 90% disability rating from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and they are taking back the severance pay from his benefits. He further states that he desires to have the offset provision waived by all agencies to include the VA because he cannot afford to pay the funds back and he does not believe it is fair that he and his wife be denied benefits that he earned during his 25 years of service.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 October 1967 for a period of 3 years. He served 1 year of his enlistment in Vietnam and was honorably released from active duty on 22 October 1970. He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement). He remained in the USAR until 4 March 1972, when he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG). He continued to serve in the ARNG and was ordered to active duty in the Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Program on 15 March 1981, where he remained until his discharge.
On 6 April 1994, the Department of the Army Physical Disability Agency dispatched a message to Fort Carson authorizing immediate discharge of the applicant by reason of physical disability at 20%, with entitlement to disability severance pay.
On 2 May 1994, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24B(3), by reason of disability with severance pay. He had served 16 years, 1 month and 18 days of total active service and had 25 years, 1 month and 18 days of service for pay purposes. He was paid $61,984.81 in disability severance pay.
A review of the available records failed to show any of the PEB proceedings, elections statements or counselings during outprocessing that normally occur prior to separation.
Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. It provides, in pertinent part, that a soldier may forfeit severance pay and be transferred to the Retired Reserve and receive nondisability retired pay at age 60, if at least 20 qualifying years of service for retirement have been completed and transfer to the Retired reserve is requested. According to the provisions of sections 1209 and 1213 of Title 10, United States Code, all rights to receive retired pay at age 60 are forfeited if disability severance pay is accepted instead of transfer to the Retired Reserve. Disability severance pay (unlike readjustment and separation pay) cannot be repaid for the purpose of receiving retired pay. The Physical Disability Agency will notify soldiers processing for disability of their options. The notification/election letter will provide sufficient detail (verified years of service for severance pay and Reserve years of service for retirement) to assist soldiers in reaching an informed decision. An election once made is final and conclusive and may not be changed. A period of 7 days plus mailing time will be afforded to the individual soldier to make a decision/election. If the soldier does not respond, the soldier will be separated with severance pay.
That regulation also provides that the VA program for disability benefits is separate and distinct from the Army disability system. The VA makes its own decisions concerning entitlement to disability compensation and ratings based on the statutes and regulations, which govern its operation. The VA is not bound by the decisions of the Army; and likewise, the Army is not bound by VA decisions. When a soldier receives disability severance pay and is subsequently rated by the VA, the VA will deduct the entire amount of severance pay from any compensation received. At the discretion of the VA, the soldier may repay the entire amount in one lump sum or the VA may withhold the monthly compensation (or a portion thereof if the VA rates higher, until the total amount equals the amount of disability severance pay received.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant was properly briefed on his options regarding severance pay in accordance with the applicable regulations prior to his election and separation.
2. Accordingly, the Board must also presume, absent evidence to the contrary, that his separation was conducted in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, with no violations of any of his rights.
3. The Board has noted the applicant's contentions regarding his having to pay back his severance pay to the VA before he can receive VA benefits. However, the Board does not have the authority to waive the dual compensation provision or direct the VA to do so. Accordingly, the Board can not grant his request.
4. Absent any evidence to suggest that the applicant was not fully advised of his options at the time of separation, the Board finds no evidence either in the evidence of record or the evidence submitted by the applicant which supports the applicant's contention that his separation was either in error or unjust.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___js ___ __reb ___ __lf ____ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2002076942 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 2003/02/25 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1994/05/02 |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-40 |
DISCHARGE REASON | DISABILITY/SEV PAY |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. 177 | 108.0000/PD |
2. 192 | 110.0300/REINSTATEMENT |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011496
It does not appear from the record that DFAS is withholding VSI payments because the applicant is now receiving VA disability compensation. The statute authorizing disability severance pay provides that, "the amount of disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered by [VA]." However, the DFAS determination as to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000043C070205
Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states the civilian handling his case recommended he not take the 10 percent severance pay because he would have to pay it back when he started to receive his retired pay. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 21 August 2005 and his DA Form 199 (Physical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019406
The applicant requests his records be corrected so that he may receive retired pay at age 60. Since he was originally eligible for retired pay at age 60, has repaid his severance pay, and his orders and NGB Form 22 assigned him to the Retired Reserve, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct his record by voiding his 30 September 1991 disability discharge with severance pay and to show he was transferred to Retired Reserve on that same date. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093058C070212
The applicant's personnel qualification record indicates that he was released from active duty on 19 December 1991 and returned to the Delaware Army National Guard per a First United States Army order dated on 4 December 1991. That record also shows that he was discharged on 20 December 1991. The DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was discharged with severance pay.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000058C070206
The findings and recommendations of the PEB were approved by the appropriate authority on 9 January 2004 and on 31 March 2004 he was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability with a 10% disability rating and entitlement to severance pay. An award of a VA rating does not establish error or injustice in the Army rating. The fact that the VA has awarded the applicant a disability rating for adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed moods does not establish physical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009294
This document also shows the applicant was advised to "explain that you were not properly briefed concerning the ramifications of accepting severance pay (loss of all benefits from the Armed Forces)" and "that you believed that when [the] VA withheld your VA disability payments until they equaled the amount of money you received in Army severance pay, you were paying back to the Army the severance pay." The Department of Defense (DoD) Finance Management Regulation (FMR), Volume 7A (Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015199
As a result, the PEB recommended a disability rating of 30 percent for this condition. As a result, the PEB recommended a disability rating of 10 percent for this condition. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired or separated.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011508C070208
At the hearing, he was called all but a liar about how he received his injury and the board gave him two choices on how he wanted to be removed from the Reserve: a) transfer to the Retired Reserve per Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 1209, with entitlement to apply for retirement benefits upon reaching age 60 (this choice would allow him to keep his job as dual status civil service at the AMSA shop), or b) be discharged with entitlement to disability severance pay. The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010029
He believed his 20-year letter made him eligible for retired pay at age 60 and any disability granted by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) would be offset by that retired pay. In 1994, he requested the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to change his discharge with severance pay to a medical retirement. The applicant's contention that he was not counseled regarding the choices available to him at the time of his separation (in regard to accepting severance pay or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015500
The DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) stated, As a Soldier with a rating of less than 30% who may have at least 20 qualifying years for Reserve retirement UP Chapter 67, Title 10, USC, you may have the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting your Reserve retirement pay, or you may request transfer to inactive Reserve status and receive Reserve retired pay at age 60 (22 January 2007). These statements were interpreted to mean he was requesting...