Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076698C070215
Original file (2002076698C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 29 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002076698


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Chairperson
Mr. Thomas A. Pagan Member
Ms. Barbara J. Lutz Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

3. The applicant states that he was injured in “Plae Ku” at Camp Holloway in 1970, that he was treated at Camp Holloway for his wounds and that he never received the Purple Heart.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted on 18 February 1969 for a period of 2 years. He served as a helicopter repairman in Vietnam from
16 September 1969 through 11 September 1970 and was honorably released from active duty on 12 September 1970.

5. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge), which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

6. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action.

7. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

8. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. His records show that he participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam.

9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 11, dated 1973. This award is not shown on his discharge document.

10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) also shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 5, dated 1973. This award is not shown on his discharge document.

11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.


CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that he was injured in Vietnam in 1970. However, there is no evidence of record to support this contention.

2. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

3. The applicant signed his DD Form 214 on 12 September 1970 attesting to the fact that he was not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

4. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

5. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, in accordance with the governing regulation, the applicant is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.

6. The applicant’s unit was cited for the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit citations.

7. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.







2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

KAK____ TAP____ BJL_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Karol A. Kennedy____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002076698
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20021029
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2. 107.0000
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013986

    Original file (20070013986.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant was wounded by a piece of shrapnel while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, there is no corroborating evidence present in the available records which shows that the applicant was wounded as the result of a hostile action. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015156

    Original file (20130015156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded in action in Vietnam on 2 October 1969. This pamphlet shows the 6th Battalion, 29th Artillery Regiment, was cited for award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 October 1966 to 31 October 1969 in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 3, dated 1970 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 29 July 1969 to 17 November 1970 in DAGO Number 52, dated 1971 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067054C070402

    Original file (2002067054C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant’s unit, 4th Battalion, 23rd Infantry, of the 25th Infantry Division, was also cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 51, dated 1971. However, evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004248C070205

    Original file (20060004248C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) General Orders Number 13918, dated 12 November 1968, show the applicant received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the period October 1967 to October 1968. Therefore, the service medical records and the entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster which show the applicant was wounded on 14 May 1970 as a result of hostile action are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart and correction of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086474C070212

    Original file (2003086474C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071654C070402

    Original file (2002071654C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006304

    Original file (20120006304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although multiple awards of this unit citation are not authorized for wear, official military and historical records will indicate all awards received. The applicant's DD Form 214 incorrectly lists the Vietnam Campaign Medal as with a "V" Device, the proper entry is the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022786

    Original file (20120022786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) and item 38 (Record of Assignments), that he was assigned to Vietnam from 12 November 1968 to 12 November 1969 and served with Company B, 1st Battalion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072466C070403

    Original file (2002072466C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 1 April 1970 at Field Support Base Illingsworth in Vietnam, three awards of the Army Commendation Medal, the Valorous Unit Award, and in effect, four bronze service stars for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal. The Board also noted that the applicant authenticated his discharge document which shows that he was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024779

    Original file (20110024779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his medical records clearly reflect he was wounded by enemy action on at least two separate dates, 16 May 1969 and 20 August 1969, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows: a. Delete the: * Vietnam Service Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Bronze Star Medal with Third Oak Leaf Cluster * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...