| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald J. Weaver | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that pay and allowances which were withheld from him during his period of confinement, between February and July 1966, be paid to him. He also requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states that he did not receive any pay while in confinement and recently received copies of his court-martial orders, which he contends, were ignored. He submits a self-authored statement and a copy of his court-martial order in support of his request.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was inducted and entered active duty on 10 February 1964. He successfully completed training as an infantryman (11B).
In September 1965 the applicant was reassigned to Vietnam as part of a unit move from Fort Riley, Kansas with the 16th Infantry.
In January 1966 the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of willfully disobeying an order. His punishment included confinement at hard labor for 6 months and forfeiture of $67.00 per month for 6 months. On 30 January 1966 the amount of his forfeiture was reduced from $67.00 per month for six months to $62.00 per month for six months. The applicant's finance records were not available to the Board and the applicant has not provided any evidence that he was entitled to any pay and allowances while in confinement or that if so entitled that he did not receive it. The Board believes, that it is possible the sentence was amended when it was discovered that his total pay was only $62.00 per month and not $67.00.
Although the applicant's records indicate that he remained in Vietnam until
5 March 1966, his separation document indicates that he was only credited with 3 months and 10 days of service in Vietnam. His remaining service in Vietnam, until his March 1966 transfer, would have been spent in confinement.
Between September 1965 and January 1966, the applicant would have been credited with participation in two designated campaign periods (Vietnam Defense Campaign and Vietnam Counteroffensive). He would also have been entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, which were
awarded to his unit while he was a member, and prior to his placement in confinement. Although his separation document reflects entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal, his campaign credit and unit awards were omitted.
On 15 August 1966 the applicant was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service at the conclusion of his service contract. The applicant authenticated his separation document.
There are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The soldier must be an infantryman (11 series specialty), assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must have actively participated in such ground combat. Campaign or battle credit alone is not sufficient for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no evidence the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant has not provided any evidence which confirms that he engaged in active ground combat during his less than 4 months of creditable service in Vietnam and as such there is insufficient evidence on which to base an award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 15 August 1966, the date the applicant was released from active duty and authenticated his separation document. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 15 August 1969.
The application is dated 22 June 2002 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it
had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
NOTE: Officials at the Army Review Boards Agency Support Division in St. Louis are requested to administratively correct the applicant’s separation document to reflect entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, the Republic of Vietnam Cross of Gallantry First Class Unit Citation and two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__MHM__ __CLG__ __RJW__ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2002076389 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030204 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | 128.00 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012868
While the Board clearly sees that the applicant was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and most likely earned his first Combat Infantryman Badge while serving in the Dominican Republic, there is no evidence in his military records, and the applicant did not provide any evidence which conclusively shows how long and when he served in the Dominican Republic. The applicant served more than 6 months in Vietnam during a qualifying period of service for award of the Republic of Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002833
Evidence shows the applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). However, there is no evidence of record that indicates he was ever recommended for or awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge during his active service. By regulation, in order to qualify for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge there must be evidence not only that the member held and served in an infantry MOS with a qualifying infantry unit, but also...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006687C070208
The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must actively participate in such ground combat. One of the applicant’s efficiency reports indicate that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, although there is no evidence to show that award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087036C070212
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Forces of the Untied States Report of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013621
The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. In the absence of evidence that the applicant actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004405
There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal; however, it does not show the bronze service stars to which the applicant is entitled for his campaign participation. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from the applicant's DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067201C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015883
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 29 May 1968 to add: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with two of three bronze service stars * Combat Infantryman Badge * Marksmanship Qualification Badge (M-60 Machine Gun) * Army Commendation Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions First Class Honor Medal Unit Citation *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006343
Personnel possessing an infantry MOS in a rifle squad or a cavalry platoon of an armored cavalry troop would be eligible for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge if other criteria are also met. Both his former commander, now a retired LTC, and a Soldier who served with him in the unit, now a retired SGM, are consistent in their statements concerning Troop A, 1st Squadron's participation in active ground combat with the enemy during the period from November 1966 to January 1967. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021156
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank as specialist five (SP5) and to show the awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Air Medal (14th Oak Leaf Cluster), and any medals awarded to...