Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067201C070402
Original file (2002067201C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 03 APRIL 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067201


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. Member
Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. Member


         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. He states he was trained as a combat engineer and assigned to an "infantry line company" upon his arrival in Vietnam. He states he received the Combat Infantryman Badge while serving in an infantry unit but it does not appear on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). He submits no evidence in support of his request.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He entered active duty on 30 August 1966, completed training as a combat engineer, and was awarded specialty 12B. In February 1967, upon completion of training, the applicant was assigned to Vietnam. He was initially assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company of the 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry but in May 1967 was transferred to Company E of that same battalion. In September 1967 the applicant was transferred to Company B of the 15th Engineer Battalion.

The applicant performed duties in his primary specialty (12B) throughout the duration of his tour of duty in Vietnam. In February 1968 the applicant returned to the United States and completed his active duty requirement at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. He was released from active duty on 8 August 1968. There is no indication the applicant was ever awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

There are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The soldier must be an infantryman (11 series specialty), assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must have actively participated in such ground combat.

Although the applicant may have been assigned to an infantry unit he did not hold an infantry specialty (11 series) and as such does not meet the eligibility requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

By virtue of the applicant's service in Vietnam, between February 1967 and February 1968, he is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal Unit Citation, and three bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, which is already reflected on his separation document.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 8 August 1968, the date the applicant was released from active duty and authenticated his separation document. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 8 August 1971.

The application is dated 8 December 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.

(NOTE: Officials at the ARBA Support Division in St. Louis are requested to administratively correct the applicant’s separation document to reflect award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal Unit Citation, and three bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal.)

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__AAO__ __HOF __ __TEO __ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION


Carl W. S. Chun
Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067201
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020430
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 142.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002288

    Original file (20150002288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record confirms GO awarded the applicant the Purple Heart and the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) with “V” Device while his DD Form 214 only shows the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100078C070208

    Original file (2004100078C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 June 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004100078 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016759C070206

    Original file (20050016759C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show all of his authorized awards for his period of service in Vietnam. Counsel requests that the applicant's records be corrected to include all of the awards to which he is entitled, specifically the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with “1960” Device, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. However, the regulation also states that in the case of duplicate awards covering the same period of time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008975C080213

    Original file (20070008975C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 30 June 1972 be corrected to add the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, and five bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal. Except for one Article 15, which did not prevent his receiving the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, there is no evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010430

    Original file (20110010430.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, three additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The applicant states, in effect: * He never received several of the above awards * He was under the impression that the above awards would follow him from Vietnam to his next duty station, Fort Bragg, NC * He served in Vietnam from (July 1966 to July 1967) * The day he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003909

    Original file (20110003909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the following: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 2. A review of his personnel service records failed to show evidence and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068089C070402

    Original file (2002068089C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device and the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states that the only evidence he has are the medals that were given to him in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of two bronze service stars for wear on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001491

    Original file (20120001491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all the awards he is entitled to including the: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Republic of Vietnam with Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal with First Class Unit Citation 2. There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence, such as orders, that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001071C070206

    Original file (20050001071C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s service personnel record which shows that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge 8. The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Good Conduct Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross because his service as a special forces Soldier in Vietnam, as documented in his military personnel service records, entitles him to these awards. Item 24: Delete: Vietnam Service Medal Item 24: Add:...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001071C070206

    Original file (20050001071C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s service personnel record which shows that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge 8. The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Good Conduct Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross because his service as a special forces Soldier in Vietnam, as documented in his military personnel service records, entitles him to these awards. The Board determined that the evidence presented was...