| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart (PH), and adding that decoration to his DD Form 214.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he has submitted new evidence which warrants the Board to reconsider his case.
NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records, which were summarized in a memorandum, prepared to reflect the Board's previous consideration of the case (AR1999032127) on 22 December 1999.
In support of his request for reconsideration the applicant submits a statement from an individual who identifies himself as the medic of the platoon the applicant was assigned to in Vietnam. The former medic states that after an attacking force was driven back, he carried a wounded soldier up a hill so he could be evacuated to a hospital. After the soldier was evacuated, he discovered there was another casualty, the applicant. The applicant's arms were burned and required application of ointment and bandaging. He completed a medical field card on the applicant's burn and sent it to the battalion aid station.
The statement submitted by the applicant is new evidence that requires Board consideration.
Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth the policy and procedures for the ABCMR. It provides that, if a request for a reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration and the case has not been previously reconsidered, it will be resubmitted to the Board if there is evidence (including but not limited to any facts or arguments as to why relief should be granted) that was not in the record at the time of the Board’s prior consideration. The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted.
The regulation provides further guidance for reconsideration requests that are received more than 1 year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case. In such cases, the staff of the Board will review the request to determine if substantial relevant evidence has been submitted that shows fraud, mistake in law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or if there exists substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s original decision.
If the staff finds such evidence, the case will be resubmitted to the Board. If no such evidence is found, the application will be returned without action.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
Included, as part of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 1994 was an amendment to the rules governing award of the Purple Heart. While the original rules established that the Purple Heart would be awarded to individual's killed or wounded as a result of hostile action the amendment enabled the Secretaries of each department to award the Purple Heart to members of the armed forces who were killed or wounded in action by weapons fire, while directly engaged in armed conflict, other than as the result of an act of an enemy of the United States. Individuals wounded or killed as a result of “friendly fire” in the “heat of battle” will be awarded the Purple Heart as long as the “friendly” projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board will accept the medic's statement as evidence that the applicant was treated for burns he incurred as a result of coming into contact with hot shell casings from a friendly machine gun.
2. Since the burn was not a result of hostile action, he was not entitled to the PH at that time.
3. Since wounds incurred as a result of friendly fire are now authorized the award of the PH, as a result of Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 1994, the Board must now consider whether the applicant's burns qualify under this legislation. In this regard, the applicant has furnished a witness who apparently treated him for burns at the time. The witness however, was not actually present to observe how and when the burns were received, thus he is unable to state that the burns were sustained while the applicant was engaged with the enemy. In the absence of a treatment record and/or other evidence showing that his wounds were a result of contact with the enemy, there are insufficient grounds for the Board to award the Purple Heart.
4. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___fne___ ___slp __ ___ela __ DENY APPLICATION
Carl W. S. Chun
| CASE ID | AR2002076103 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021022 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051125C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071002C070402
The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). It was also stated that the wound was not a result of enemy action. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 July 1966 and was honorably discharged to accept a commission on 7 September 1967.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007779
A Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) and a Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History) completed at the time of his release from active duty do not show he was wounded as a result of enemy action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the PH is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although the RVN Gallantry Cross orders indicate he was wounded, his service record is void of evidence that he was wounded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028023
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His service record does not contain any orders which show he was awarded the Purple Heart or medical documentation which shows he was wounded as a result of friendly fire in Vietnam. Therefore, in the absence of any corroborating evidence of record which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or friendly fire, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010580
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100022457 on 8 March 2011. Additionally, his records do not contain official orders awarding him the Purple Heart. While the applicant's medical records clearly show he was medically evacuated, admitted to various hospitals, and underwent treatment for perforated ears, there is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018585
The applicant states he was injured in the line of duty in Vietnam but was not awarded the PH. The applicant's records show he participated in the Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 campaign during his Vietnam service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the PH for wounds received in action against a hostile enemy on 18 February 1970 in the Republic of Vietnam * adding the PH to his DD Form 214 *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075404C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT STATES : He was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100329C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that during a firefight with enemy forces in Vietnam he sustained a blast injury to his right ear, a burn to the right side of his face, and was knocked unconscious. This ruling, in effect, granted the service Secretaries the authority to award the Purple Heart to individuals directly engaged in armed conflict who were killed or wounded as a result of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001070C070205
There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel record which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. This ruling, in effect, granted the Service Secretaries the authority to award the Purple Heart to individuals directly engaged in armed conflict that were killed or wounded as a result of "friendly fire." Therefore, in the absence of official documentary evidence substantiating medical treatment of the applicant's wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000163
There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was involved in an accidental discharge of a weapon by another Soldier and he later received treatment for this injury.