Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. | Analyst |
Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Chairperson | |
Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Member | |
Ms. Mae M. Bullock | Member |
2. The applicant requests that a 23 July 2001 Department of the Army (DA) Form 4991-R, Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS), be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).
3. The applicant states that as an initial term soldier he should not have been required to sign the DCSS.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted for 5 years and entered active duty on 12 November 1997 in pay grade E-3. He completed training, progressed normally and was promoted to sergeant (E-5) on 5 October 2000. On 23 July 2001 he was counseled that he did not meet the service remaining requirement (SRR) to undergo reclassification assignment and was required to sign a DCSS form acknowledging said counseling.
5. Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program) states in paragraph 4-6 in discussing SRR and in paragraph 4-11 concerning DCSS that the requirements are not applicable to a soldier in the initial term of service.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The DCSS was improperly used and should be expunged from the applicant's records.
2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below will correct an error and rectify an injustice.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by expunging the DA Form 4991-R dated 23 July 2001 from the records of the individual concerned.
BOARD VOTE:
_MKP___ __JLP___ __MMB _ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_Margaret K. Patterson_
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2002075730 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | |
DATE BOARDED | 20030114 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010977
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a DA Form 4991-R (Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS)) and a duplicate Army Achievement Medal (AAM) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: DA Form 4199-R, dated 24 January 2001; U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (TAPC) memorandum, subject: Request for Withdrawal of DCSS (applicant's name and social security number), dated 15 May 2001; DD Form 4...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021424
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It provides that a DCSS is an official notification from a Soldier, other than one in his or her initial term, having 4 or more years of service for pay purposes at ETS who refuses to take action (reenlist/extend) to meet the service remaining requirements (SRR) for an assignment, school, or promotion. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002373C070206
The applicant requests that his DA Form 4991-R (Declination of Continued Service Statement [DCSS]) and any supporting documents be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The evidence shows that the applicant reenlisted on 5 June 2001 to meet the service remaining requirements for his assignment to recruiter school and once again on 7 August 2004 for a RA reenlistment option in accordance with the needs of the Army. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011597
He states he signed a DA Form 4991-R (Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCCS)) before his expiration term of service (ETS) due to the Army ordering his permanent change of station (PCS) to Hawaii with insufficient time left on his enlistment contract. It states Soldiers, other than those in their initial term, having 4 or more years of service for pay purposes at ETS must take action to meet service remaining requirements (SRR), such as the service obligation incurred by making a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014807
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The SPD code of MBK is the correct code for RA Soldiers eligible to reenlist, or with a DCSS in force, who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, upon the completion of their enlistment and transferred to the Reserve components to complete military service obligation. The SPD code of MBK has a corresponding RE code of "RE-3" when a Soldier's record indicates the Soldier has signed a DCSS.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072618C070403
The applicant requests that the Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS), DA Form 4991-R, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 February 1990 and has had continuous service since. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by removing the DA Form 4991-R dated 9 November 2000 from the applicant’s OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010360
Between January and March 2011, there was a Military Personnel (MILPER) Message, Subject: Change to Retention Control Point (RCP) for Enlisted Soldiers Serving in the Regular Army (RA) or Under Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Title 10 Programs, briefed to all career counselors that all RCP dates were going to be effective 1 June 2011 (his ETS date was 19 June 2011). ; (3) first his unit received orders which showed he was "Authorized full separation pay" and after that the DCSS issue came up;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075731C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was a staff sergeant serving in Germany, on 30 April 1990, when he executed the subject DCSS. The Board noted the applicant’s desire to have his DCSS removed from his OMPF, and understands his concern over this document remaining on file in his records.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059923C070421
The applicant further indicated in the signed DCSS that he understood the effects his refusal would have on his Army career and on any future decision he might make concerning reenlistment or enlistment after separation. The SPD code of KBK was the appropriate code to assign members separating under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, for completion of required active service. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant voluntarily requested separation after...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019759
Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 28 October 2013 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 13 due to unsatisfactory performance. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows his discharge was in error or unjust. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...