Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075471C070403
Original file (2002075471C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 31 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002075471


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that block 11 of his report of separation (DD Form 214) dated 31 August 1999, be corrected to reflect the amount of time he served as a UH-1 pilot, a UH-60 pilot and as a UH-60 instructor pilot.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not reflect that he served as a UH-1 pilot for 1 year, a UH-60 pilot for 6 years and 1 month and a UH-60 instructor pilot for 11 years and 11 months.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he completed the aviation warrant officer basic course in August 1980 and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of a UH-1 pilot (153B0). He served in that position for 1 year before transitioning to the MOS of a UH-60 pilot (153D0), where he served for 6 years and 1 month, when he completed the UH-60 Instructor Pilot Course in September 1987 and was awarded the MOS 153DC. He served in MOS 153DC for a period of 11 years and 11 months before he was retired in the rank of CW4 on 31 August 1999.

5. At the time of his retirement, his DD Form 214 indicated in block 11, that he had served in MOS 153DC as a UH-60 pilot for “0” years and “0” months.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant’s DD Form 214 clearly does not reflect the applicant’s MOS qualifications over a 19-year period in Army Aviation. Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to correct this administrative oversight at this time.

2. Accordingly, the applicant’s records should be corrected to reflect in block 11 of his DD Form 214 dated 31 August 1999, that he held the primary specialty of 153B0 – UH-1 pilot for 1 year and 0 months, the primary specialty of 153D0 – UH-60 Pilot for 6 years and 1 month and the primary specialty of 153DC – UH-60 Instructor Pilot for 11 years and 11 months.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.










RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned held the primary specialty of 153B0 – UH-1 pilot for 1 year and 0 months, the primary specialty of 153D0 – UH-60 Pilot for 6 years and 1 month and the primary specialty of 153DC – UH-60 Instructor Pilot for 11 years and 11 months, instead of 153DC – UH-60 Pilot for 0 months and 0 days, as currently reflected on his DD Form 214 dated 31 August 1999.

BOARD VOTE:

__rks ___ __dh____ ___clg___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Curtis L. Greenway____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002075471
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/10/31
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 189 110.0000/CORR 214
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083058C070215

    Original file (2002083058C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He notes that the incentive bonus would have “amounted to $12,000.00 per year for every year [he] remained in an active AH-64 pilot position” and contends that he would have served for 3 years and 6 months as an AH-64 pilot following completion of training, which he estimated to be approximately 6 months. However, during the period in question the Army did have a “Limited Call to Active Duty Program” which permitted United States Army Reserve warrant officers to volunteer for active duty. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008255C070205

    Original file (20060008255C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Scott Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He states the discharge was improper according to Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges) and Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) for a medical administrative discharge and has resulted in inaccurate information in his personal file. He states that Army Regulation 600-8-24, paragraph 2-31...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006771

    Original file (20120006771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows in: a. item 5 (Oversea Service), he served in the RVN from 6 April 1968 to 3 May 1969 and in Germany from 10 June 1969 to 25 April 1972; b. item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns), award of the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Army Aviator Badge, Parachutist Badge, RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), RVN Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with Gold Star,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063444C070421

    Original file (2001063444C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends the rater and SR evaluated him on duties outside his MOS and not in accordance with Army regulation. Further, the regulation also requires that any report with a potential evaluation in Part Vd of “Do not promote” or narrative comments to that effect from any rating official require referral to the rated officer. The contested OER was completed by the correct rating officials.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051134C070420

    Original file (2001051134C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends the rater and SR evaluated him on duties outside his MOS and not in accordance with Army regulation. Further, the regulation also requires that any report with a potential evaluation in Part Vd of “Do not promote” or narrative comments to that effect from any rating official require referral to the rated officer. The contested OER was completed by the correct rating officials.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009567

    Original file (20060009567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. The applicant concludes by stating, in effect, that within 6 months of May 2004 he completed the Qualification Course for the UH-1 and then completed the C-26 Qualification Course less than a year later. The evidence of record further shows that upon review of the applicant's NGB Form 62-E, the commander of the applicant's proposed unit recommended approval of the applicant's appointment to fill a UH-60 Pilot position. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007133

    Original file (20130007133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he executed an OAB agreement with the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) on his date of commissioning on 17 May 2008 * he reverted to a warrant officer on 19 November 2008 for the needs of the Army * he went to flight school and was subsequently qualified in military occupational specialties (MOS) 153A (Rotary Wing Aviator), 153D (UH-60 Pilot), and 153M (UH-60M Pilot) * he received the first installment of the bonus in early 2011 * an exception to policy (ETP),...

  • CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2007-124

    Original file (2007-124.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7 ○ The following written comment in the OER supports the mark of 3: “Displayed lack of motivation & leadership to upgrade to Aircraft Cdr, well beyond the normally expected timeline of peers; aviation status terminated, reassigned to duties not involving flight ops.” The applicant stated that he was designated as an HH-60 First Pilot on December 4, 2002, and that the “normal progression from HH-60 First Pilot to Aircraft Commander is 18 months.” By May 20, 2003, he alleged, less than six...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021502

    Original file (20120021502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He graduated from the U.S. Army Warrant Officer Candidate School on 3 August 2010 and he was appointed as a Reserve WO and granted Federal recognition in the SCARNG on 3 August 2010. His OAB addendum also stated that his OAB would accrue beginning on the date the OAB addendum was accepted by the Secretary of the Army, the total amount of the bonus payable under the agreement becomes fixed upon acceptance of this written agreement by the Secretary of the Army, and he was being accessed into...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012329

    Original file (20090012329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. his foreign service in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom; b. award of the Army Commendation Medal; and c. his completion of the UH-60 Helicopter Repairer Course. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), and a DA Form 4980-14 (Army Commendation Medal Certificate) as documentary evidence in support of this application. It...