| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:
18. In the preparation of the applicant's file for execution of the Board's direction to afford him a promotion review, it was discovered that the applicant had the potential entitlement of retention for one additional year beyond his normal mandatory removal date (MRD) under the provisions of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 635-100 paragraph 6f.
19. NGR 635-100, paragraph 6f states, in pertinent, part that Army National Guard Technicians may be extended beyond their normal mandatory release date in order to be eligible for immediate Civil Service retirement provided they are otherwise fully qualified.
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES:
8. Based on the applicant's years of commissioned service, the applicant's MRD is one year less than the date that he would be eligible for a full Civil Service retirement based on his age.
9. In view of the additional factors in this case, the Board concludes that it is in the interest of justice to grant the applicant a one-year extension of his MRD to enable him to retire at age 55 with full civil service retirement benefits.
10. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending by adding to the Board’s recommendation appearing in the proceedings, dated 23 May 2001:
c. to show that the individual concerned was granted a one year extension beyond his normal mandatory release date.
BOARD VOTE:
_JLP____ __HOF__ _GJW___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_ Jennifer L. Prater__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002074788 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020723 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 136.01 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009331
The applicant served his extended ADSW tour and the State of California issued retirement orders and Federal recognition withdrawal orders with effective dates of 30 September 2006. Upon retirement, the applicant began receiving retired pay, but he was not credited with service from 14 July 2004 through 12 September 2006 because no Federal recognition orders had been published extending his Federal recognition beyond his original MRD. State Adjutants General are the approving authority for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001698C070205
U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (sic) Orders P03-583064 dated 1 March 2005 placed the applicant on the retired list effective 9 June 2005. Notwithstanding the advisory opinion, it would be equitable to correct the applicant’s records to show that his request for an extension of his MRD was submitted prior to his applying for retired pay, that he was found to be fully qualified for retention until 23 July 2005, and that he applied for retired pay, with a retirement date of 24 July 2005,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056476C070420
In the opinion of the Board, the e-mail, dated 9 August 1999, the fact that the applicant was promoted to major on 31 August 1999, and the actions taken by unit officials as a result gave the applicant the reasonable impression that her extension had been approved. Thus, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate that the applicant’s promotion to major be considered valid and that all service she performed after reaching her MRD at age 60, up until 16 October 2000, be creditable for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014710
His issue is related to paragraph 2-5(h) (eligibility for consideration) of Army Regulation (AR) 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) which states that if an officer's MRD falls within 90 days of a promotion board's convene date, the officer's packet would be removed and not be considered by the promotion board. Several errors were committed as follows: * He was not notified a year out from MRD that he would be released * His MRD was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007597C070206
It directed his retirement points be adjusted to 79 points per service year, until his MRD, and that he be paid any additional monies due as if he had performed the additional IDT and AT periods. Upon review of the applicant's file, in preparation for final administrative processing of his promotions, several procedural discrepancies where found and it was determined that additional Board action was necessary to correct these factors to properly afford the applicant the recommended relief. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102698C070208
NGB further stated that the applicant was discharged from the Army on 18 October 1977 and that, on 5 October 1977, he received appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer with an effective date of 19 October 1977. The NGB opinion stated that the applicant completed an application for Federal Recognition on 11 November 1979 and that he indicated that he was in the USAR from 18 October 1977 until the "present." The applicant's service personnel records contain a Department of the Army,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017181
References: * Title 10, USC, section 10145: Ready Reserve Placement In * Title 10, USC, section 12213: Officers Army Reserve: Transfer from ARNGUS * Title 10, USC, section 12215: Commissioned Officers Reserve Grade of Adjutant Generals and AAG's * Title 10, USC, section 14003: Reserve Active Status List (RASL) Position of Officers on the List * Title 10, USC, section 14507: Removal from the RASL for Years of Service, Reserve Lieutenant Colonels and COL's of the Army, Air Force, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074577C070403
The applicant’s military records show that on 7 December 1982, she was commissioned a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) of the United States Army Reserve (USAR), and that she is currently assigned to the Retired Reserve and is receiving retired pay. By regulation, Retired Reserve members who were removed from active status are ineligible for consideration for promotion to the next higher grade. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was selected for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081099C070215
Evidence of record shows that the applicant was considered, and selected, for promotion to colonel/pay grade O-6 by a Department of the Army Special Selection Board and that his effective date of promotion was 2 March 1998. As such, the applicant is not entitled to have his records corrected to show an extension of his MRD beyond 3 September 2001, or his service beyond 30 September 2001. d. Correcting the individual’s military records to show that he was promoted to colonel/pay grade O-6...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009671C071029
He concludes his request by stating, in effect, that he would appreciate the opportunity to continue to serve his country until he reaches the age of 62 and assist in alleviating the immediate and long term shortages of qualified CA officers in an active duty or reserve component environment. The Human Resources Specialist, Transition and Separation Branch, continued the opinion by stating that the applicant had been granted an extension to his mandatory removal date to 23 February 2008 to...