Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074574C070403
Original file (2002074574C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 14 January 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002074574

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Joyce A. Wright Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Ms. Mae M. Bullock Member
Ms. Jennifer L. Prater Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that item 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show a more favorable Separation Program Designator (SPD) code.

APPLICANT STATES: That the SPD Code of "KDB" was placed in error. He
attempted to have it corrected prior to his separation from active duty; however, his time was limited. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show he enlisted
on 18 January 1989, as a medical supply specialist. He continued to serve through a series of continuous reenlistments.

The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s release from active duty are not present in the available records. However, his DD Form 214 shows that on 9 November 2000, he was released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-3a due to hardship. He had a total of 11 years, 9 months, 22 days of creditable service. He was issued an SPD code of "KDB."

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 6 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, for the separation of personnel because of genuine dependency or hardship.
Separation under this chapter is for the "Convenience of the Government."
An application for such separation will be approved when a service member can substantiate that his/her situation or immediate family's situation has been aggravated to an excessive degree since enlistment, that the condition is not temporary, and that discharge will improve the situation.

Paragraph 6-3a, provides for the separation for dependency. Dependency exists when death or disability of a member of a soldier’s (or spouse’s) immediate family causes that member to rely upon the soldier for principal care or support.

Army Regulation 635-5-1, in effect at that time, prescribed the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation shows that the separation program designator (SPD) "KDB", as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214, is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is
"Hardship" and that the authority for discharge under this SPD is "Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-3a."




DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no procedural errors, which would tend to jeopardize his rights.

2. The type of separation directed and the reasons for that separation were appropriate considering all of the available facts of the case.

3. The applicant was separated and assigned an SPD code in accordance with regulations. The applicant has also failed to show, through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, that the SPD code of
"KDB" issued to him was incorrect.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show
to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that
the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence
that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mp___ __mb___ ___jp___ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002074574
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030114
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 20001109
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, parag 6-3a
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 191
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060211C070421

    Original file (2001060211C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 February 2001, the applicant submitted a formal personnel action request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, paragraph 6-5, due to dependency of a family member. He stated in his request that the applicant’s son required special attention due to an automobile accident, was confined to a wheelchair, and required constant care and supervision. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant requested to be discharged under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018937

    Original file (AR20080018937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Hardship Dependency", and the separation code is "KDB." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012550

    Original file (20120012550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * The RE code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows "NA" (not applicable) * He is trying to reenter the Army, but he is being told he must have an RE code and the "NA" code is an error * He completed his service and never had any discipline issues * He received an honorable discharge * He should have a normal RE code 3. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004075

    Original file (20090004075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 23 JULY 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004075 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 6-3 of Army Regulation 635-200 states that Soldiers of the Active Army and the Reserve Components may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship. Evidence of record shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030215

    Original file (20100030215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his Reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed so that he may be eligible to reenter the Army. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 22 March 2010 under the provisions of paragraph 6-3a, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administration Separations), hardship. The available evidence shows the applicant was separated for hardship.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004068

    Original file (20090004068.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004068 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's request for separation based on pregnancy was not initiated until 17 October 2007, 5 full weeks after her son's birth. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing on her DD Form 214 her narrative reason for her separation as dependency; b. showing the authority for her...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000275

    Original file (AR20080000275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 shows a characterization of service as uncharacterized, with the separation authority AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3A, narrative reason of Harship, separation code of KDB and a reentry code (RE) of "3". The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant's record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013887

    Original file (20130013887.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in item 26 (Separation Code) the code "KDB" and in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the reason as "Unable to Continue Service due to Death of a Child/Hardship." The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records; however, his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000392

    Original file (20070000392.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 14 June 2005 be changed to Hardship instead of Secretarial Authority. Evidence of record shows the applicant applied to the ADRB for a narrative reason for separation change to hardship/dependency and he provided substantive evidence to support his request. Since the evidence of record shows that he should have been discharged due to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002300

    Original file (AR20080002300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant. The analyst found that the applicant's record shows a properly amended DD Form 215 correcting the characterization of service as Honorable, with the separation authority AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3A, narrative reason as Hardship, separation code as KDB.