| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. James E. Anderholm | Member | |
| Ms. Eloise C. Pendergast | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he should receive constructive credit for his graduate degree.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his graduate degree is in public administration with an emphasis in health care administration. He claims that both areas are pertinent to his military specialty as a 70B (Medical Field Specialist) in the Army Medical Service Corps (MSC). He requests that he be granted constructive credit for the graduate work he completed prior to his being commissioned as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the United States Army Reserve on 3 May 2001. In support of his application, he provides a copy of his graduate school transcript.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 3 May 2001, he was appointed a 2LT in the MSC of the USAR. The Appointment Memorandum, dated 9 April 2001, issued by the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), St. Louis, Missouri, confirmed that the applicant was appointed in specialty 70B and that he was granted no constructive service credit.
The applicant provides a transcript from the University of Texas at San Antonio, which shows that he completed the requirements for and was awarded a Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree on 13 December 1997.
In connection with the processing of this case an advisory opinion was provided by the Chief, MSC Division, United States Army Recruiting Command (USAREC). This MSC recruiting official states that the degree information provided by the applicant does not entitle him to constructive credit under the provisions of the governing regulation and Department of Defense Instructions (DODI). He further comments that the applicant’s specialty is an entry level developmental position, which requires a baccalaureate degree and successful completion of the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Officer Basic Course (OBC), and is not authorized constructive credit.
On 19 November 2002, the applicant was provided a copy of this advisory opinion in order to have the opportunity to respond. To date, he has failed to reply.
Army Regulation 135-101 prescribes policy, procedures, and eligibility criteria for appointment in the Reserve Components of the Army, in the six branches of the Army Medical Department (AMEDD). Paragraph 3-4 (Transition Credit) states, in pertinent part, that the grade and date of rank upon appointment will be determined by the law and regulations in effect on the date of the appointment.
Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 6000-13 (Medical Manpower and Personnel) contains guidance on granting constructive credit to health care professionals for additional education, training, and experience in order to provide them an entry level grade and date of rank comparable to that obtained by officers who begin commissioned service after obtaining a baccalaureate degree and serve for a period of time it would take to gain the additional education. However, constructive credit is not authorized for members entering an entry level development program.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he should have received constructive credit for an advanced degree that he earned prior to his appointment. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. By regulation, constructive credit for advance degrees is not authorized for members entering a developmental specialty. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was appointed in the 70B (Medical Field Specialist), which is an entry level developmental specialty. Thus, the Board concludes that at the time of his appointment he was not eligible to receive constructive credit for his advanced degree.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__FNE__ __JEA _ __ECP __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002074100 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/02/06 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | N/A |
| DISCHARGE REASON | N/A |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 229 | 112.0700 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064778C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be awarded constructive credit. As noted in the USAREC advisory opinion, the applicable regulation does not authorize constructive credit to members being appointed in an entry level specialty. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was appointed in the MSC of the USAR in an entry level specialty and that he was informed at the time of appointment that no constructive credit was being awarded.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009418
The applicant states the DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit Health Services Officers) filed in her military service records does not show she completed a second BS degree (in Biology) and a Master of Public Health (MPH) degree. She states that Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Branches), Table 3-4 (Credit for Additional Advanced Degrees), provides for additional constructive credit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087070C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted constructive credit and that his date of rank be adjusted accordingly. The applicant provides a list of his qualifications and experience, the 6 November 2002 Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) memorandum awarding him specialty 72D, a United States Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) professional evaluation memorandum, dated 17 September 2002, and a copy of his appointment memorandum, dated 13 November 2001. This determination is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025106
The applicant requests an exception to policy for award of additional day-for-day constructive credit from 11 October 2007 to 8 April 2009 for his prior commissioning adjunctive skills. The official also stated that in reference to additional credit for his unique skills as a military officer, the applicant had prior commissioned service as a QM officer in the U.S. Army. The evidence of record shows he was awarded and appointed with the correct amount of constructive credit.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016317
On 14 February 2008, the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant, pay grade O1E, MSC, in specialty 70B (Health Service Administration). The opinion stated that the applicant's appointment was based on his bachelor's degree in health services administration. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant, MSC based on his bachelor's degree, and awarded specialty 70B.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013137
Section 6.1.1.1 states service on active duty or in an active status as a commissioned officer in any of the Uniformed Services, in the corps or professional specialty in which being appointed, shall be credited on a day-for-day basis with any commissioned service performed before such appointment. c. Section 6.1.2 (Constructive Service Credit) states constructive service credit provides a person who begins commissioned service after obtaining the additional education, training, or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074559C070403
It indicates that the applicant is entitled to an additional 4 years and 5 days of constructive credit based on his prior commissioned service between 1988 and 1996. The USAREC opinion finally includes a recommendation that the applicant receive a total of 5 years, 9 months, and 7 days of constructive credit instead of the 1 year, 9 months, and 23 days he was previously awarded by his 29 May 1998 appointment memorandum. It also authorizes an entry grade of 1LT, which requires 3 years of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010556
He maintains that his required record of CSC, DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers)) was not authorized. Army Regulation 135-101 states that officers will be granted 4 years of CSC for a doctorate level credit in biochemistry. It further states that officers with 4 years or more, but less than 14 years of CSC will be appointed in the grade of CPT.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000355
He states he: * was given constructive credit with a DOR of 16 February 2009 when he was commissioned * was referred to the website for this Board when he inquired about being promoted because his constructive credit worksheet was filled out wrong * should be up for promotion to first lieutenant 3. His DA Form 5074-1-R prepared on 8 March 2010 shows he was not awarded any constructive service credit (0 years, 0 months, and 0 days) for his Bachelor of Arts degree in Health Administration. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020868
The applicant provides the following: * DA Form 5074 (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers), dated 4 December 2009 * Academic Transcript, University of California-Davis, dated 14 September 2007 * Transcript of Record, University of California Extension-Irvine, dated 2 August 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The opinion states the applicant appropriately received 25 days of constructive service credit for his professional work experience that commenced on 1...