Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064778C070421
Original file (2001064778C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 23 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001064778

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Chairperson
Mr. Mark D. Manning Member
Mr. Thomas Lanyi Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be awarded constructive credit.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that upon his initial entry into the United States Army Reserve (USAR), he had a bachelor’s degree, masters degree, certificate of advance study, as well as other certificates and specialized training in administrative management beneficial to the Army Medical Department (AMEDD). He claims that during his application process for entry into the USAR, the three recruiters that worked with him were impressed with his credentials and background. At that time, they told him about constructive credit, which could be awarded to people to compensate them for education, training, and life experience prior to joining the military. The application process for him to join the USAR took over three years, and when he received his acceptance letter from the Army, much to his surprise, there was no constructive credit awarded. He immediately contacted his recruiter and was informed that awarding of constructive credit was no longer being done for that year. Upon his arrival at his first and second units, he consulted the personnel staff and was informed that there was nothing they could do about the situation. When he arrived at his present unit, he was told the same thing; however, the Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel (DCSPER) of his current unit encouraged him to apply to this Board for the requested relief. In support of his application, he provides copies education and experience documents to support his request.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 2 July 1996, he was appointed a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Medical Service Corps (MSC) of the USAR. A Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit-Health Services Officers (DA Form 5074-1-R), prepared on the applicant by the Chief, Medical Service Branch, during his entrance processing shows that he was granted no constructive credit.

The appointment memorandum, dated 2 July 1996, issued by the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), St Louis, Missouri, indicated that his primary specialty was 70B and that he was being awarded no constructive credit.

In July 1998, the applicant was promoted to first lieutenant (1LT) and in June 2001, he was promoted to captain (CPT). He is currently serving in this rank in a Troop Program Unit of the USAR.

In connection with the processing of this case an advisory opinion was requested of and received from the Chief, MSC Division, Health Services Directorate, United States Army Recruiting Command, Fort Knox, Kentucky, dated
22 February 2002. It indicated that the information provided by the applicant does not increase the amount of constructive credit that is allowable under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-101 and Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 6000-13.
The USAREC advisory opinion also confirmed that the applicant’s appointment specialty was 70B (Health Services Administration Officer), which is an entry level developmental position that requires a baccalaureate degree and successful completion of the AMEDD Officer’s Basic Course (OBC). By regulation, constructive credit is not authorized for an entry level specialty of 70B.

On 1 March 2002, the applicant was provided a copy of this advisory opinion in order to have the opportunity to respond to its contents. However, to date, he has failed to reply.

Army Regulation 135-101 prescribes the policies, procedures, and eligibility criteria for appointment in the Reserve Components of the Army, with or without concurrent call to active duty, in the six branches of the AMEDD. It states, in pertinent part, that education and experience constructive credit for MSC officers is limited to that required for entry into the specialty. As a result, no constructive credit is authorized to members entering the MSC in an entry level specialty.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board noted the contention of the applicant that he was entitled to constructive credit based on his pre-appointment education and experience. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2. As noted in the USAREC advisory opinion, the applicable regulation does not authorize constructive credit to members being appointed in an entry level specialty. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was appointed in the MSC of the USAR in an entry level specialty and that he was informed at the time of appointment that no constructive credit was being awarded.

3. Although, the Board did note and consider the applicant’s impressive
pre-appointment record of education and experience, given the applicable regulatory guidance, it finds no error or injustice related to his not receiving constructive credit for these accomplishments. Therefore, the Board concludes there is no basis for granting the requested relief in this case.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.


5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

KAK MDM TL DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001064778
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/04/23
TYPE OF DISCHARGE N/A
DATE OF DISCHARGE N/A
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY N/A
DISCHARGE REASON N/A
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 229 112.0700
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074100C070403

    Original file (2002074100C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Appointment Memorandum, dated 9 April 2001, issued by the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), St. Louis, Missouri, confirmed that the applicant was appointed in specialty 70B and that he was granted no constructive service credit. Paragraph 3-4 (Transition Credit) states, in pertinent part, that the grade and date of rank upon appointment will be determined by the law and regulations in effect on the date of the appointment. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087070C070212

    Original file (2003087070C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted constructive credit and that his date of rank be adjusted accordingly. The applicant provides a list of his qualifications and experience, the 6 November 2002 Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) memorandum awarding him specialty 72D, a United States Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) professional evaluation memorandum, dated 17 September 2002, and a copy of his appointment memorandum, dated 13 November 2001. This determination is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009418

    Original file (20150009418.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit – Health Services Officers) filed in her military service records does not show she completed a second BS degree (in Biology) and a Master of Public Health (MPH) degree. She states that Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Branches), Table 3-4 (Credit for Additional Advanced Degrees), provides for additional constructive credit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005895

    Original file (20070005895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his constructive service credit be reevaluated and that his date of rank (DOR) be adjusted from 22 February 2006 to 21 November 2003, based on his AMEDD (Army Medical Department) military and civilian education experience. On 22 February 2007, the Acting Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, submitted a memorandum to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), requesting that the Board approve the applicant's DOR adjustment. Paragraph...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000772C070208

    Original file (20040000772C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that Army Regulation 135-101, paragraph 3-4e needs to be taken into account when calculations are made for constructive credit for his prior service Medical Service Corps (MSC) time and credit for dental school. The advisory opinion went on to state that, while the applicant correctly quoted DODI 6000.13, paragraph 6.1, in that instance MSC referred to the Navy Medical Service Corps and not the Army Medical Service Corps. The advisory opinion noted that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010556

    Original file (20110010556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He maintains that his required record of CSC, DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers)) was not authorized. Army Regulation 135-101 states that officers will be granted 4 years of CSC for a doctorate level credit in biochemistry. It further states that officers with 4 years or more, but less than 14 years of CSC will be appointed in the grade of CPT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000044

    Original file (20130000044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 5074-1-R, dated 14 December 2010, shows she was granted: * total constructive credit of 4 years, 9 months, and 10 days (4 years for her doctoral degree in microbiology (during the period 15 August 2004 – 20 December 2008) and 9 months and 10 days for work experience) * total prior service credit of 3 years, 7 months, and 18 days * total entry grade credit of 8 years, 4 months, and 28 days 6. The record shows she was granted 3 years, 7 months, and 18 days of prior service credit. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101187C070208

    Original file (2004101187C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Robert L. Duecaster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, an adjustment to the constructive service credit granted upon appointment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing her 1LT date of rank is 27 July 2000 based on the constructive service credit she was awarded by the corrected DA Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007499

    Original file (20100007499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was accessed into the Army Medical Services Corps (MSC) as a Social Work Officer on 30 June 2006 in the rank of captain (CPT) instead of first lieutenant (1LT). The orders further stated: Effective on the date of entry on active duty (AD), you are appointed in the grade of 1LT and placed on the Active Duty List (ADL) in the grade of 1LT in accordance with (IAW) Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000150

    Original file (20120000150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. information concerning his civilian professional biochemistry experience was inadvertently omitted in the constructive service credit section of his DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers)). In accordance with USAREC Regulation 601-37, constructive credit is calculated up to the date of board, which was 14 April 2009. c. in reference to his additional credit for work experience after he graduated from the University of...