Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073638C070403
Original file (2002073638C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 12 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002073638

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member
Mr. William D. Powers Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the Social Security Account Number (SSAN) contained in his military records be corrected.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that when he enlisted in the Army, the SSAN of one of his sons was used by mistake. He claims that the SSAN is properly recorded in his Navy records, and that he was under the impression that the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) was getting it changed. In support of his application, he provides a copy of his Social Security Card (SSC) and a DVA rating decision letter.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 19 September 1989, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years. His Enlistment Contract (DD Form 4) contains the same SSAN that is recorded in his Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1), which was created on
21 September 1989, upon his entry on active duty, and last reviewed by the applicant on 23 September 1993.

On 24 September 1993, the applicant reenlisted for 4 years while serving at Fort Hood, Texas. The DD Form 4 created for this enlistment also contains the same SSAN recorded in his previous enlistment contract and in his personnel record.

All orders, documents, and other information on file in the applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ), many of which were authenticated by the applicant with his signature, also all contain the same SSAN contained in the applicant’s enlistment contract and Personnel Qualification Record, which he used throughout his tenure on active duty.

On 1 February 1995, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing a total of 5 years, 4 months, and 13 days of active military service in the Army. The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to and authenticated by him on the date of his separation lists the same SSAN that was recorded in all his personnel records and enlistment contracts.

In support of his application, he provides a copy of a SSC which lists a SSAN that is different from the one recorded in his military records. He also provides a copy of a DVA rating decision that lists the same SSAN that is recorded in his military records, but is lined through and listed as a duplicate.


DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the SSAN listed in his military records and on his 1 February 1995 DD Form 214 should be changed. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim. Although the applicant now claims that the SSAN contained in the SSC he provided is correct, and the one recorded in his military records is incorrect, he fails to provide an official explanation from the Social Security Administration, or any other source, to explain the use of these duplicate SSANs.

2. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant’s active duty service was performed under the SSAN he now claims was in error, and that this SSAN was the one recorded in his enlistment contract, the military records prepared on him upon his entry on active duty, and in orders and documents prepared on him throughout his tenure on active duty, many of which he authenticated with his signature.

3. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The information contained therein should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created and under which the military service was performed. Therefore, the Board concludes that the SSAN contained in the applicant’s military records and in his
1 February 1995 separation document should not be changed.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__JNS__ __DPH___ __WDP__ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002073638
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/09/12
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1995/02/01
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200 C4
DISCHARGE REASON ETS
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 10 100.0900
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085995C070212

    Original file (2003085995C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant’s active duty service was performed under the SSAN he now claims was in error. Therefore, the Board concludes that the SSAN contained in the applicant’s military records and in his 1 October 1982 separation document should not be changed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074879C070403

    Original file (2002074879C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Therefore, the Board concludes that the SSAN contained in the applicant’s military records and in his 24 April 1979 separation document should not be changed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103026C070208

    Original file (2004103026C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He states that he did not present his SSAN card at the time of his entry into the service and only provided what he believed was his SSAN at the time. However, in order to provide a solution that provides the applicant the relief necessary to obtain veterans benefits and that still maintains the accuracy of the military records in question, the SSAN correction will be limited to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071021C070402

    Original file (2002071021C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This letter was provided under a FAX cover sheet from a staff member of the applicant’s MOC’s office, which stated that the applicant was in need of corrected DD Form 214 listing his correct SSAN, in order to be admitted to a DVA hospital. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to correct the SSAN listed in the applicant’s separation document to the one now certified as correct by the Social Security Administration. That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083377C070212

    Original file (2003083377C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: This is also the SSAN that was recorded in his Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20), and other service records created during his tenure on active duty. The DD Form 214 issued to him on the date he was separated lists the SSAN he now claims is incorrect in Item 3 (Social Security Number); and Item 5 (Grade, Rate of Rank) contains the entry PFC, which confirms he held this rank on that date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080386C070215

    Original file (2002080386C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 confirms that he was trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman), and that he completed two combat tours and was credited with participating in six campaigns in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). In this case, it appears that the applicant used both the SSAN recorded in the majority of his records and the one he now claims is correct, which is only recorded in a few of his military documents. Thus, the Board concludes the SSAN listed in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002436C071029

    Original file (20070002436C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Donald L. Lewy | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, change to the Social Security Account Number (SSAN) listed on her 12 August 1971 separation document (DD Form 214). Although the Social Security Administration is indicating that the applicant has had the same SSAN on file in the records since September 1967, the SSAN they indicate is correct was never a part of any of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071133C070402

    Original file (2002071133C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be changed to show his correct social security account number (SSAN). However, it finds insufficient evidence that suggests the SSAN recorded in his military records was in error at the time he served.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074238C070403

    Original file (2002074238C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 issued for this period of active duty service shows that the applicant was discharged on 6 June 1974, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of special court-martial conviction, and that he received a bad conduct discharge (BCD). The Board finds no evidence to show that the SSAN recorded on the applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 27 April 1978, was not the one under which he entered into and performed this period of active duty service. In this case, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068166C070402

    Original file (2002068166C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his correct social security number (SSN); that his rank be changed to specialist/E-4 (SPC/E-4); and that his reentry (RE) code be upgraded. Therefore, the Board concludes that the SSN contained in the applicant’s 25 April 1985...