| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Antoinette Farley | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Member | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Lutz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the deceased former service member’s (FSM’s) bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions.
APPLICANT STATES: That she, the FSM’s sister, has given permission to the Tribe’s Yankton Sioux Veterans Officer Representative to work in her brother’s behalf.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: The FSM is now deceased and had served over 3 ½ years of his 4 year enlistment in the Army from 10 November 1953 to 5 May 1957. In view of the circumstances the FSM’s family only wishes that a tombstone and burial flag be provided. In support of the FSM’s claim a copy of his Certificate of Military Service and a copy of his Certificate of Death is provided.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM’s military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Information herein was obtained from partial court-martial records. These records show that he enlisted at the age of 17, in the Army on or about 10 November 1953 for 3 years. His GT Score was 69. He completed basic and advanced individual training at Fort Riley, Kansas. He was then transferred to a Quartermaster unit in Korea for 16 months. He worked as a security guard, guarding supplies.
The FSM also received two summary court-martial convictions, while in Korea. On
18 September 1954, he was convicted by a summary court-martial of being in an
off limits area. His sentence included restriction for 30 days and forfeiture of
$25.00 pay. On 21 March 1955, the FSM received a second summary court-martial of loitering on post. His sentence included restriction for 30 days and forfeiture of $45.00.
The FSM’s record show that he then returned from overseas and was assigned to the 720th Military Police Company, Fort Hood, Texas, for approximately five months. Ultimately being reassigned to 553rd Armored Infantry Battalion, 4th Armored Division, Fort Hood, Texas.
On 17 July 1956, the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial (GCM) of one specification for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86 of being AWOL from 21 February 1956 to 11 June 1956. He was sentenced to a forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for 1 year and a BCD.
On 23 July 1956, the convening authority affirmed the sentence subject to appellate review of the discharge action. It was also determined that the FSM would be confined in the United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.
On 10 August 1956, the Office of The Judge Advocate General, Board of Review affirmed the finding of guilty and the sentence.
On 17 August 1956, the FSM after consulting with counsel and being informed that the sentence was affirmed, waived his right to petition the Court of Military Appeals for a grant of review.
On 20 August 1956, General Court-Martial Order 632 was issued by Headquarters, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, announcing that the sentence of forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for 1 year and a BCD imposed against the applicant on 23 July 1956, had been affirmed, and that Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, ordered the BCD was to be duly executed.
On 25 January 1957, the Office of The Provost Marshall General, Washington, D.C. denied the FSM request for restoration to duty, release on parole and clemency.
On 5 May 1957, the FSM was discharged, with a BCD. He had completed
3 years, 3 months and 26 days of active military service. He had 116 days of lost time from 21 February 1956 to 11 June 1956 for being AWOL and 365 days due to confinement. The highest pay grade he attained was E-2.
Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section
1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which should have been raised in the appellate process, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The FSM’s service records were destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Court-martial records indicate that the applicant was absent without leave from his unit from 21 February 1956 until 11 June 1956.
2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge, given the time and circumstances, appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record, the FSM representative must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The FSM’s representative and family has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
4. The Board is empathetic with the family, but concludes that the FSM's less than honorable record of service does not provide a basis for an upgrade of his discharge. However, the family may still work with the DVA concerning veteran’s benefits or burial benefits.
5. Determination to entitlement of the GI Bill and other veteran benefits does not rest with this Board, rather it rests with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The applicant is advised to contact that agency on these matters.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___KAK _ ___TAP _ ___BJL__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002073323 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002.10.29 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 CH3 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A68.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | DIRECTOR |
| ISSUES 1. | A123.01 |
| 2. | A110.02 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012371
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012371 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, reassessing the sentence, the Board of Review further determined that on the basis of the entire record,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099539C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There are no documents in available records indicating that the applicant's command ever took actions to follow-up on the recommendation to administratively discharge the applicant. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, provided the authority for discharging enlisted personnel for unfitness.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006934C070208
Stanley Kelley | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member, be corrected by upgrading his discharge to honorable. The FSM was discharged on 8 January 1985, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-11, as a result of court-martial, with a bad conduct discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058067C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, reconsideration of his request for an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge (DD) which this Board denied on 27 February 1974. He was sentenced to a forfeiture of all pay and allowances, CHL for 7 years and to be discharged from service with a DD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014990
Counsel stated the FSM was convicted of serious offenses; however, it was imperative, in order to evaluate an appropriate punishment for such conduct, to also consider the offenses were committed while the FSM was under the influence of drugs and because he was addicted to drugs. The Secretary of the Army also advised that while confined the FSM's case would be periodically considered by the Army and Air Force Clemency and Parole Board and the Office of the Secretary of the Army to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074435C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. That the Department of the Army issue to the individual concerned a General Discharge certificate from the Army of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007578
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 17 July 1973, the FSM surrendered to military authorities at Fort Dix, New Jersey, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL charge. On 18 October 1973, the United States Army Court of Military Review (USACMR) having found the findings of guilty and sentence as approved by proper authority correct in law and fact and having determined, on the basis of the entire record, that the findings of guilty and only so much of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071577C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He departed Germany on 21 July 1978, en route to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, with a report date of 24 August 1978. He failed to report as ordered and was reported as AWOL from 24 August 1978, until he was returned to military control on 7 September and charges were preferred against him for the absent without leave (AWOL) offense.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001284
The FSMs initial DD Form 214, which reflected that he was dishonorably discharged from active duty on 21 August 1967, was reissued (by order of the Secretary of the Army), to reflect the character of his discharge as Under Conditions Other Than Honorable" and the FSM was issued DD Form 259A (Bad Conduct Discharge Certificate). Evidence shows that the FSM was discharged from active duty as a result of sentence of a general court-martial. The evidence of record failed to establish a basis...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013413
On 30 June 1954, the applicant, at a general court-martial (GCM) pled not guilty to the charge of desertion and guilty to the lesser included offense of AWOL for the period from 21 February to 8 June 1954. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded in action against a hostile force on 1 December 1952; received medical treatment, and is "entitled" to the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...