| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was told that his discharge would be automatically upgraded to honorable and has just discovered that it was not done.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in Providence, Rhode Island, on 23 January 1976, for a period of 3 years, training as an infantryman and assignment to the 7th Infantry Division at Fort Ord, California.
He was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey, to undergo his basic training and on 18 March 1976, was transferred to a special training company. He eventually completed basic training and was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia, on 17 May 1976. He completed his advanced individual training and was transferred to Fort Ord on 21 July 1976.
On 4 August 1976, he was counseled by his squad leader regarding his inability to get along with members of his squad and to control his temper. He was again counseled on 12 August 1976 regarding his attitude, disrespect, lack of motivation and disregard for his peers. On 25 August 1976, he was counseled for being disrespectful towards a noncommissioned officer (NCO) and for failure to obey a lawful order from an NCO.
On 15 November 1976, he was counseled by his platoon sergeant for being disrespectful in language towards an NCO and for lying to an NCO. He was counseled again the same day for communicating a threat towards an NCO.
The applicant underwent a psychological evaluation at the Mental Hygiene Consultation Service at Fort Ord on 10 December 1976, which opined that the applicant presented a hostile attitude towards authority and some peers. He has a chronic history of being inappropriate with his anger and his efforts to change his perspective since entry on active duty had met with negative results. The applicant was deemed to have no signs of psychiatric illness that would warrant medical separation and was cleared for administrative actions deemed appropriate by the commander.
On 29 December 1976, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him for being disrespectful in language towards an NCO on 20 December 1976. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay and extra duty.
On 17 December 1976, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37 and the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). He cited as the basis for his recommendation, the applicant’s failure to respond to numerous counseling sessions by the commander, platoon leader, and his enlisted chain of command. He also cited the applicant’s negative attitude towards further military service, his stated and demonstrated inability to adapt to military life, lack of self-discipline and lack of motivation.
After consulting with counsel, the applicant voluntarily consented to the discharge with the understanding that he might receive a general discharge and could expect to encounter some prejudice in civilian life. He also acknowledged that he could only be discharged under the EDP if he agreed to the discharge and that he could withdraw his consent anytime prior to approval by the discharge authority.
The appropriate authority approved the recommendation on 19 January 1977 and directed that he be furnished with a General Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 25 February 1977, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37 and the EDP. He had served 1 year, 1 month and 3 days of total active service.
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
The Department of the Army began testing the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP) in October 1973. In a message dated 8 November 1974 the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel announced the expansion of the EDP. The program provided for the separation of soldiers who acceptability, performance of duty, and/or potential for continued effective service fall below the standards required for retention in the Army. Soldiers may be separated under this program when subjective evaluation of their commanders identifies them as lacking qualities for continued military service because of attitude, motivation, self-discipline, inability to adapt socially or emotionally, or failure to demonstrate promotion potential. Soldiers considered for separation under this expanded program had to agree to separation under this program. Soldiers who did not agree to separation under this provision were not exempt from separation under another provision of the regulation. An honorable of general discharge were required and there has never been any provisions for an automatic upgrade of a discharge less than fully honorable.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s administrative discharge was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no violations of the applicant’s rights. Accordingly, his discharge and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
2. The Board has noted the applicant’s contention and find it to be without merit. There have never been any provisions for an automatic upgrade of such a discharge and there is no evidence to suggest that he was informed that such was the case.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___dh___ __kan___ __mhm __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002066530 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/05/14 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1977/02/25 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200, CH5 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | EDP |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 516 | 144.2900/A29.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073141C070403
He was returned to Fort Myer on 11 October and on 13 October 1978, the suspended portion of his punishment for the NJP imposed on 27 July 1978 was vacated and he was reduced to the pay grade of E-3. On 9 January 1979, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31 and the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). Soldiers had to consent to separation under this program in order for commanders...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009282
On 20 May 1977, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate action to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 5-37 (Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP)), chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200. This form also shows: * he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37 * his service was characterized as under honorable conditions * he was issued a General Discharge Certificate 11. There is no evidence that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007939
A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions of an individual whose military record was not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. This program, known as the DOD SDRP, required, in the absence of compelling reasons to the contrary, that a discharge upgrade to either honorable or general be issued in the case of any individual who had either completed a normal tour of duty in Southeast Asia, been wounded in action, been awarded a military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006713
On 23 October 1979, the applicant acknowledged that his unit commander notified him he was initiating action which could result in separation from the Army with a general discharge under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. g. page 30 shows that the applicant's counsel requested a continuance of the board proceedings and counsel and the board recorder argued over...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009994
On 5 April 1977, the applicants immediate commander advised the applicant that he intended to recommend his discharge from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 5-37 (Expeditious Discharge Program, or EDP) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of inability to adapt to a military environment and lack of motivation and self-discipline. There is no indication showing that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074885C070403
There is no indication in the record that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) requesting an upgrade to his discharge within its 15 year statute of limitations. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations. Further, the Board concludes that the applicant’s discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026813
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 23 September 1977, his commander informed him that he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-37, under the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015371
On 14 February 1978, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate action to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP) in accordance with chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel). The applicant's immediate commander recommended that he be discharged under the provisions of the EDP and the separation authority approved his discharge and directed that he be furnished a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013263
On 23 September 1977, the applicant's unit commander initiated separation proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37 (Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). Army Regulation 15185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). _______ _X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001134
The applicant requests correction of his military records by upgrading his general discharge to an honorable discharge. On 20 May 1982, the separation authority approved the applicant's recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31, and directed the applicant be furnished a DD Form 257A (General Discharge Certificate). Accordingly, on 28 May 1982, the applicant was discharged.