Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072913C070403
Original file (2002072913C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 4 February 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002072913


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Mr. Ronald J. Weaver Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he attended an International Business Machine (IBM) course and to show he was in Vietnam.

3. The applicant states that he completed an IBM course at Tripler Army Medical Center. He was on temporary duty to the 121st Aviation Company in Vietnam about June, July, and August 1965. He thought the entry “USARPAC” covered his service in Vietnam. He provides a Certificate of Training; several photographs, including one he took of the sign at the entrance of the Soc Trang Army International Aerial Port; a 16 October 2002 statement from an individual whom the applicant told about his time in Vietnam; and copies of several of his military pay vouchers as supporting evidence. The pay vouchers are all signed except for those for August and September 1965. He believes it is more than just coincidence that there is no signature on the pay vouchers for the months he was in Vietnam.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 October 1962. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 64A (Light Vehicle Driver).

5. The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2d Battalion, 27th Infantry, Hawaii, on or about 17 September 1963.

6. The Certificate of Training provided by the applicant shows he completed 1 and 1/2 weeks of Basic IBM training at Tripler Army Medical Center on 22 March 1965.

7. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was assigned to Vietnam. A 20 July 1965 entry in his medical records shows he was treated at the U. S. Army Dispensary at Army Post Office San Francisco 96557. That post office was located in Hawaii in July 1965.

8. A check of morning reports for the 121st Aviation Company for the months of June and August 1965 failed to reveal the applicant was attached or otherwise with that unit for those months. Several attempts to obtain morning reports for Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2d Battalion, 27th Infantry, for the pertinent periods were unsuccessful.

9. A 16 October 2002 letter from the applicant’s Representative in Congress states that the applicant is in the background just in front of the sign in a (different) picture taken of the entrance sign of the Soc Trang Army International Aerial Port.

10. The applicant departed Hawaii on or about 7 October 1965.

11. The applicant was released from active duty on 11 October 1965. Item 24c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 shows he was assigned to the U. S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) for 2 years and 25 days. Item 28 (Service Schools or Colleges, College Training Courses, and/or Post-Graduate Courses Successfully Completed) shows he completed no such schools or courses. Item 29 (Other Service Training Courses Successfully Completed) shows he completed no other training courses.

12. Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations, Administrative Separation Procedures and Forms) (the version in effect at the time) stated that service schools and military-sponsored courses completed in civilian schools and colleges successfully completed would be entered in item 28 of the DD Form 214. Installation training courses, military correspondence courses, and off-duty courses successfully completed would be entered in item 29.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant served in Vietnam.

2. The Board has considered the photograph the applicant provided showing the unit sign in Vietnam; however, there is no way to verify that the applicant is in fact in that photograph.

3. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he most likely did not sign some of his military pay vouchers because he was in Vietnam; however, there is no verification that that was the reason they are not signed.

4. The provided 16 October 2002 statement is not from an individual who personally knew the applicant to be in Vietnam.

5. The provided evidence is insufficient to show the applicant served in Vietnam.

6. The Board accepts the Certificate of Training to show the applicant completed a basic IBM course in 1965. Item 29 of his DD Form 214 should be amended accordingly.

7. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected but only as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION:

1. That item 29 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 be amended to add the Basic International Business Machine course.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__MHM__ __CLG _ __RJW__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                  _ _Melvin H. Meyer_ __
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX


CASE ID AR2002072913
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/02/04
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION PARTIAL
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.07
2. 100.00
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023931

    Original file (20110023931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his records to show he completed 2 months and 29 days of foreign service in Vietnam vice 1 month and 27 days. The applicant provides: * letter from the U.S. Army Administration Center, St. Louis, MO (previously submitted) * DD Form 1108 (Application for Replacement of Separation Document) (previously submitted) * mailing envelope (previously submitted) * DD Forms 2349 (Military Pay Voucher) for 1-30 June 1965...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015109

    Original file (20110015109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he performed more than 25 combat hours in Vietnam and he was awarded the Air Medal * during training in Hawaii for the Shot Gun Platoon, he had a Class III physical which should be in his medical records * he was trained as an aerial door-gunner with the Shot Gun Platoon * he participated in six campaigns during his service in Vietnam * he was a Military Police (MP) officer with the 560th MP Company for base security and a standby door-gunner; he was an MP – not a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014791

    Original file (20110014791.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He contends he has proof of combat flight hours while serving with the 121st Assault Helicopter Company from 17 August through 2 December 1967, and also has a copy of the orders which show he was authorized to add the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar to his DD Form 214. Item 24 of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or is authorized the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Air Medal, the Aircraft Crewman Badge, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019301

    Original file (20130019301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. his service in Vietnam and Korea; and b. award of the Vietnam Service Medal. The applicant states: * his Congressman helped him obtain additional documents from his medical records which show he served more than 5 months in Vietnam * he obtained notarized eyewitness statements from former fellow unit members who confirm his service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006910

    Original file (20120006910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his service in Vietnam and Korea; and b. award of the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence in the available records which shows he served in Vietnam or Korea. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011942

    Original file (20120011942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his military record to show he served in Thailand and any awards associated with that service. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Hawaii from 16 September 1961 through 8 April 1963. He was discharged on 11 April 1963 and provided a DD Form 214 denoting this foreign service with the entry of USARPAC in Item 24c.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006528

    Original file (20120006528.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states there is no record on file of him serving in these countries except the records he provides with this application. Qualifying service for this award includes service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011051

    Original file (20070011051.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. Evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 17 September 1965 to 8 November 1965. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to the list of awards identified on his DD Form 214, dated 7 January 1966, award of the Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018138

    Original file (20140018138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 May 1966 to 24 April 1968. Aside from the entry on his DD Form 214 pertaining to him being an overseas returnee from USARPAC, there is no evidence in his service records and he did not provide any substantiating evidence that shows he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019624

    Original file (20110019624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the periods ending 1 July 1970 and 2 April 1973 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Letter from the Office of the Chief of Transportation * Letter from a former chief * Extract of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the detachment may have sailed out of...