Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072513C070403
Original file (2002072513C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 25 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002072513

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member
Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he held the rank and grade of Major, O-4 so her Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) may be increased.

APPLICANT STATES: That the FSM was posthumously promoted to Major retroactive to 30 March 1966. He was on the promotion list for several months and was due to be promoted on 20 August 1966.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM’s military records show:

After having had prior enlisted service, he was commissioned out of the U. S. Military Academy and entered active duty on 4 June 1957. He was promoted to Captain, O-3 on 4 June 1964. He arrived in Vietnam on or about 25 March 1966. He was killed in action on 12 August 1966.

By message date/time group 1300Z August 1966, Headquarters, Department of the Army, Casualty Branch informed the Commanding General, U. S. Army Vietnam that the FSM had been posthumously promoted to the rank of Major effective 30 March 1966 with a date of commission of 18 August 1966.

Army Regulation 600-8-29 prescribes the officer promotion function of the military personnel system. In pertinent part, it states that an officer may be posthumously promoted if, at the time of death, proper authority had approved the recommendation of the promotion selection board at the time of death, the death was not due to the officer’s own misconduct, and the officer was not on an unauthorized absence.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1521 states that the President may issue an appropriate commission in the name of a member of the armed forces who, after 3 September 1939, was officially recommended for appointment or promotion to a commissioned grade and the recommendation for whose appointment or promotion was approved by the Secretary concerned but was unable to accept the promotion of appointment because of death in line of duty. Section 1523 states that no person is entitled to any bonus, gratuity, pay, or allowance because of a posthumous commission or warrant.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) booklet, Federal Benefits for Veterans and Dependents, 2002 edition, states that DIC payments may be available for a surviving spouse who has not remarried. One of the eligibility criteria is for the deceased to have died from a disease or injury incurred or aggravated while on active duty.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. At the time of the FSM’s death, the Army promoted him, thereby showing that he held the rank of Major. As the applicant acknowledges, he would not have ordinarily been promoted until shortly after his death. The Board offers the applicant condolences on her loss; however, by law the FSM’s posthumous promotion did not create an entitlement to any bonus, gratuity, pay, or allowance. Dependency and Indemnity Compensation is a DVA program. The DVA operates under its own policies and laws and the Department of Defense has no jurisdiction over its affairs if it chooses not to make an exception to the law.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RVO__ __RTD__ __KWL__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002072513
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/07/25
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100383C070208

    Original file (2004100383C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Robert L. Duecaster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Department of the Army or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provide her retroactive survival benefits from 1973 until March 2001. The election form (VA Form 29-8286 or SGLV 8286) signed by the FSM, which is in his official records, is the official document used in the settlement and payment of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066200C070421

    Original file (2001066200C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too). It also permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050004916

    Original file (20050004916.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dennis J. Phillips | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The applicant provides no evidence to show her and the FSM were improperly briefed when he enrolled in the SBP during the 1981 through 1982 Open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009004

    Original file (20140009004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Probate Court found that at the time the FSM executed his Will, it was his last will and testament and that his mother was to be appointed to serve as the Executrix of his general estate. Counsel provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 5 March 2007 * DA Form 199, dated 9 April 2007 * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board Proceedings) * VA Rating Decision, dated 14 November 2007 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005352

    Original file (20080005352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he was not retired but was on active duty at the time of his death, thereby entitling her to receive $150,000 in additional Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI). The applicant also states that there was no need to medically retire her husband under the Imminent Death Policy on 7 December 2003 because the law was changed two years earlier, with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071122C070402

    Original file (2002071122C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In March 1952, he submitted a request to appear before an ORC board to be considered for appointment as a commissioned officer. He indicated that the request was not favorably considered because the FSM was eligible for consideration for an appointment in the ORC under current regulations and that the authority to do so had been delegated to Army commanders in the area in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022764

    Original file (20100022764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a waiver of the Barring Act and payment of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity she is due based on the death of her husband, a former service member (FSM). On 19 December 2007, DFAS informed the applicant her request for RCSBP benefits was being denied based on the Barring Statute because her claim had not been submitted within 6 years of the FSM's death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105156C070208

    Original file (2004105156C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On the 24th March 1945, taking off from marshalling areas in France in nearly perfect weather, nearly 4000 aircraft from the British 6th Airborne Division and the 17th US Airborne Division dropped paratroopers behind enemy lines, into Westphalia in the vicinity of Weselon, east of the Rhine River. Army Regulation (AR) 135-100, Appointment of Commissioned and Warrant Officers of the Army, prescribes policy and procedures for the appointment of commissioned and warrant officers in the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008088C070206

    Original file (20050008088C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. DIC also may be authorized for survivors of veterans who at the time of death were determined to be totally disabled as a result of military service,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091002C070212

    Original file (2003091002C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he withdrew from the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) due to being rated by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) at 100 percent disabled. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1452(g)(1) provides that a person who has elected to participate in the SBP and who is suffering from a service-connected disability rated by the VA as totally disabling and has suffered from such...