Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008088C070206
Original file (20050008088C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           11 August 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050008088


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John N. Slone                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Deborah S. Jacobs             |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Michael J. Flynn              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to
show he declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage.

2.  The applicant states the Army Board for Correction of Military Records
(ABCMR) corrected his records to show he was retired for physical
disability in 1975.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)
then, in effect, established a debt to collect back SBP premiums.  His
spouse will get more in Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Dependency and
Indemnity Compensation (DIC) than in SBP should he die.

3.  The applicant provides his retirement orders; his Retiree Account
Statement dated 2 December 2004; an SBP Withdrawal Consent Form; an extract
from the Disabled American Veterans Magazine; his latest marriage
certificate; a divorce decree dated 1987; and a divorce decree dated 1992.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 18 September 1964.  On
      5 August 1973, he was promoted to Sergeant First Class, E-7.  On 21
October 1975, he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of
trial by court-martial.  He was married at that time.

2.  On 27 January 1989, the Department of Veterans Affairs found the
applicant to be 100 percent disabled due to post-traumatic stress disorder.

3.  The applicant divorced and remarried twice.  He last remarried on
          27 September 2002.  On 19 December 2003, his spouse provided her
consent for the applicant to withdraw from the SBP.

4.  On 16 December 2003, in Docket Number AR2002076652, the ABCMR corrected
the applicant's records to show he was placed on the Permanent Disability
Retired List on 22 October 1975.

5.  The applicant's Retiree Account Statement dated 2 December 2004 shows
his spouse would receive a maximum SBP annuity of $414.53.

6.  The applicant provided an extract from the Disabled American Veterans
Magazine which shows the survivor of a deceased E-7 would receive DIC in
the amount of $1,027.00.

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that
military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay
reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  The
election had to be made prior to the effective date of retirement.  Failure
to make an election resulted in automatic spouse coverage, full base
amount.

8.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986,
required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election
that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

9.  The Department of Veterans Affairs booklet, Federal Benefits for
Veterans and Dependents, 2002 edition states DIC payments may be available
for surviving spouses of deceased service members or veterans who have not
remarried.  To be eligible, the deceased must have died from (1) a disease
or injury incurred or aggravated while on active duty or active duty for
training; (2) an injury incurred or aggravated in line of duty while on
inactive duty training; or (3) a disability compensable by VA.

10.  DIC also may be authorized for survivors of veterans who at the time
of death were determined to be totally disabled as a result of military
service, even though their service-connected disabilities did not cause
their deaths.  One criterion is the veteran was continuously rated totally
disabled for a period of 10 or more years immediately preceding death.

11.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(e)(1) provides that, if an SBP
annuity is not payable because the DIC payment is greater, then any amount
deducted from the retired pay of the deceased member shall be refunded to
the surviving spouse or former spouse.

12.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(c) requires an SBP offset for the
amount of DIC paid.  Section 1450(c)(1) states if, upon the death of a
member participating in the SBP, the surviving spouse or former spouse is
also entitled to DIC, the surviving spouse or former spouse may be paid an
SBP annuity but only in the amount the annuity otherwise payable would
exceed that compensation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Because the ABCMR took action in 2003 to retire the applicant effective
1975, it was impossible for him to have made an SBP election prior to the
effective date of his retirement.  However, the correction resulted in DFAS
establishing SBP for him based on his failure to decline to participate in
the SBP in a timely manner and establishing a debt to pay for that SBP.

2.  Should the applicant die, his spouse would be eligible to receive an
SBP annuity in the approximate amount of $414; however, she would be
entitled to DIC in the approximate amount of $1,027.  Because DIC would be
greater than the SBP annuity, she could not receive the SBP annuity.  Any
SBP amount deducted from the applicant's retired pay or otherwise collected
from him would be refunded to his spouse.  The applicant should not be
burdened with the debt when it appears his spouse would not receive the SBP
annuity.

BOARD VOTE:

__jns___  __dsj___  __mjf___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
showing he declined to participate in the SBP prior to his physical
disability retirement of 22 October 1975.




            ___John N. Slone______
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050008088                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050811                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |137.03                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016816

    Original file (20080016816.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay upon reaching age 60 and that she be paid his retroactive retired pay and Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000870

    Original file (20070000870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000870 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002142

    Original file (20080002142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 July 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002142 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, as he acknowledges, at the time he elected to participate in the SBP he had not been approved for those benefits. The applicant retired on 26 September 2006 and started drawing retired pay on 1 October 2006.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000265

    Original file (20090000265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election be changed from spouse and children coverage to children-only coverage. The FSM's military records show that he received his 15-year letter on 27 December 2001. The applicant, the spouse of a deceased FSM, requests that the FSM's SBP election be changed from spouse and children coverage to children-only coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016424C071029

    Original file (20060016424C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Since the FSM died with spouse...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050004916

    Original file (20050004916.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dennis J. Phillips | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The applicant provides no evidence to show her and the FSM were improperly briefed when he enrolled in the SBP during the 1981 through 1982 Open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002897C070206

    Original file (20050002897C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that Section 24 of the DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) contains a signature which has been forged. She requests that this signature be removed and replaced with a statement indicating that she did not agree with the decision of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to decline SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012219

    Original file (20080012219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A copy of the applicant's Summary of Retired Pay Account shows DFAS did not receive the applicant's SBP election certificate. On 17 January 2008, DFAS received the applicant's SBP Benefit Withdrawal Consent Form with spousal consent. The evidence of record confirms that prior to his retirement from the Army Reserve the applicant attempted to enroll in the RCSBP during an open season in 2005, and his application was returned due to it being incomplete.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003130

    Original file (20150003130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After 28 years (of paying SBP premiums) he was notified that if he died first, she would never receive 55 percent of his retired pay. His retired pay records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) show: * he is authorized military retired pay (unknown effective date) but he elected to receive a full VA waiver * his original SBP election was spouse coverage, effective 9 January 1990 * his SBP premiums were suspended due to the death of his spouse in June 2014 10. The SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067415C070402

    Original file (2002067415C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 7 November 1977. Premiums are normally deducted from retired pay. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant completed his DD Form 2656 on 30 September 1996 and declined, with his spouse’s concurrence, to participate in the SBP, making the debt for SBP premiums invalid.