Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072411C070403
Original file (2002072411C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 17 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002072411


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Elzey J. Arledge Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern Member
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as specialist four/pay grade E-4 instead of private first class/pay grade E-3. He also requests that his discharge document be corrected to show any awards and decorations to which he may be entitled.

3. The applicant states that he was separated from the Army on temporary records and that his original 201 file was in Germany. He contends, in effect, that his rank should be specialist four/pay grade E-4 instead of private first class/pay grade E-3 and that he is entitled to additional awards and decorations.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty on
12 October 1995. He served as an air defense weapon (avenger) crewmember and was honorably discharged on 3 November 2001 by reason of disability with severance pay.

5. Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the entry, “PFC.” Item 4b (Pay Grade) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry, “E3.” Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 shows the Army Service Ribbon as an authorized award.

6. Section I (Service Data) on the applicant’s Enlisted Record Brief, dated
25 September 2001, shows he was promoted to private first class/pay grade
E-3 on 23 October 1998. This record shows that the applicant was promoted to specialist four/pay grade E-4 on 15 April 1999. His Enlisted Record Brief also shows that he was reduced to private first class/pay grade E-3 on 22 October 1999.

7. There is no evidence in the available records of any misconduct or the reason for the applicant’s reduction from specialist four/pay grade E-4 to private first class/pay grade E-3 on 22 October 1999.

8. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was promoted to specialist four/pay grade E-4 after 22 October 1999 or prior to his separation on 3 November 2001.

9. Section E (Awards and Decorations) on the applicant’s Enlisted Record Brief does not show entitlement to any awards or decorations.

10. The Board notes that the applicant is eligible for the National Defense Service Medal for his honorable active service from 12 October 1995 through
3 November 2001. This award is not shown on his discharge document.


11. Review of the available records and Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) does not reveal entitlement to any additional awards or decorations.

12. Army Regulation 635-5 provides instructions for the preparation of the DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and
4b (Pay Grade) will be completed to show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation.

13. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, and 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank as specialist four/pay grade E-4 instead of private first class/pay grade E-3. However, the applicant’s Enlisted Record Brief, dated 25 September 2001, shows he was reduced from specialist four/pay grade E-4 to private first class/pay grade E-3 on 22 October 1999.

2. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was promoted to specialist four/pay grade E-4 after 22 October 1999 or prior to his separation on 3 November 2001. Therefore, the Board determined that there is no basis for changing items
4a (Grade, Rate, or Rand) or 4b (Pay Grade) on the applicant’s DD Form 214.

3. The applicant is entitled to award of the National Defense Service Medal for his honorable active service from 12 October 1995 through 3 November 2001. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this medal.

4. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the National Defense Service Medal.






2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

EJA____ TBR____ KAH_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Elzey J. Arledge______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002072411
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020917
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 102.0200
2. 107.0069
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091117C070212

    Original file (2003091117C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 14 on the applicant's DD Form 214 does show he completed the Driver Training Course in 1998. Therefore, item 14 on his DD Form 214 should be amended to show completion of this course. Therefore, item 14 on his DD Form 214 should be amended to show completion of this course.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060679C070421

    Original file (2001060679C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item I1, Section I, Enlisted Records Brief, prepared on 12 April 2001 shows applicant’s rank and Date of Rank (DOR) as: SPC 19960615. His DD Form 214 correctly shows his rank as PFC; however, the date of rank shown in item 12h is not correct. The date of rank shown on the DD Form 214 is that for the former rank of Specialist Four held by the applicant before he received nonjudicial punishment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001193

    Original file (20080001193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests that two awards of the Army Achievement Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Noncommissioned Officers Professional Development Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar be added to this DD Form 214. Since the applicant was promoted to E-4 in the USAR in MOS 64C on 29 April 1985, one year after his release from active duty, there is no basis for amending items 4a, 4b, and 11 on his DD Form 214 for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029676

    Original file (20100029676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 21 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100029676 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as PFC/E-3 and his AAM. Records show his commanding officer recommended the applicant for advancement on 29 August 2001; further, his financial and personnel records show his rank and pay grade as PFC/E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017196

    Original file (20080017196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank and pay grade as specialist (SPC), E4 in item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade). Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. Based on Army Regulation 635-5, the DD Form 214 is meant to reflect the applicant's status as of his last...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004954

    Original file (20120004954.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * Kosovo (Kosovo Force) Identification Card (ID) * military ID card showing his rank and pay grade as SPC/E4 * Article on the 1st Battalion, 32nd Infantry * letter from his commander to his mother postmarked from Kosovo * notarized letter from his mother * previous DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued separation orders dated 11 April 2003 showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016348

    Original file (20090016348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 February 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090016348 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), item 4b (Pay Grade), and item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 March 1992 be corrected. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 March 1992, a Certificate of Promotion,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019438

    Original file (20120019438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her service was characterized as honorable versus "uncharacterized." Specifically, individuals of the USAR ordered to active duty who have completed less than 180 days of continuous active duty will have their service uncharacterized, even though they have completed initial active duty for training. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008786

    Original file (20060008786.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show specialist/pay grade E-4, his date of birth to show 14 May 1977, Service Members Group Life Insurance (SGLI) in the amount of $400,000.00, award of the Good Conduct Medal and two Army Achievement Medals. The applicant states that he was promoted while he was in Kuwait and was awarded the Good Conduct Medal and two Army Achievement Medals that are not shown on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012333

    Original file (20070012333.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and correction of his DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing-Armed Forces of the United States) to show his rank as private first class/pay grade E-3, effective 9 September 2005. This regulation, in pertinent part, states that the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation, taken from the Soldier’s ERB, will be entered in Item 4a and 4b of...