| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Member | |
| Mr. Conrad V. Meyer | Member |
2. The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous application to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he received an award certificate for the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 14 July 1968 in Vietnam. He contends that the Purple Heart is not shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge).
4. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the Memorandum of Consideration prepared to reflect the Board’s previous consideration of the Docket Number AR2001052397 by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 26 April 2001.
5. With his request for reconsideration, the applicant submitted an award certificate, dated 18 July 1968, for award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in action on 14 July 1968 in Vietnam. This same award certificate was provided with his original application.
6. This Board noted that the service number shown on the award certificate for the Purple Heart provided by the applicant is not the applicant’s correct service number.
7. The applicant’s request for reconsideration does not contain new evidence. However, in reviewing his application, the staff of the ABCMR again searched the Vietnam Casualty Roster using the applicant’s correct service number. This search revealed that he was, in fact, wounded in action on 4 May 1968.
8. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was wounded a second time as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
10. Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth the policy and procedures for the ABCMR. It provides that, if a request for reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration and the case has not been previously reconsidered, it will be resubmitted to the Board if there is evidence that was not in the record at the time of the Board’s prior consideration. This includes but is not limited to any facts or arguments as to why relief should be granted. The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted.
11. The regulation provides further guidance for reconsideration requests that are received more than one year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case. In such cases, the staff of the Board will review the request to determine if substantial relevant evidence has been submitted that shows fraud, mistake in law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or if there exists substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s original decision. If the staff finds such evidence, the case will be resubmitted to the Board. If no such evidence is found, the application will be returned without action.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board noted denial of the Purple Heart by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR2001052397, dated 26 April 2001.
2. This Board noted the award certificate originally provided by the applicant which shows he received the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on
14 July 1968 in Vietnam. This Board also noted that the applicant’s correct service number is not shown on this award certificate.
3. Therefore, this Board concluded that the lack of evidence supporting the applicant’s claim to award of the Purple Heart could have resulted from an incorrect service number on the award certificate provided by the applicant.
4. Based on the foregoing, this Board determined that the award certificate was not then and is not now sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case.
5. This Board noted that contrary to the decision by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR2001052397, dated 26 April 2001, the Vietnam Casualty Roster does in fact show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam on 4 May 1968.
6. Based on all of the foregoing, the Board determined:
a. The Vietnam Casualty Roster confirms the applicant was wounded in action on 4 May 1968, not on 14 July 1968.
b. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded more than once during his service in Vietnam. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to only one award of the Purple Heart.
c. The applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam on 4 May 1968 and correction of his military records to show that he was wounded in action in Vietnam on 4 May 1968.
7. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 4 May 1968 in Vietnam.
2. That so much of the applicant as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
CLA___ TSK_____ CVM_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Celia L. Adolphi____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2002072211 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | Yes |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021210 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023759
He provides: * Original request, dated 4 October 1978 * Army Board of Correction of Military Record (ABCMR), Record of Proceedings, dated 13 March 2008 * Letter from the U.S. Army & Joint Service Records Research Center * Two Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Forms 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim) COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, the evidence of record and the Vietnam casualty roster show an individual with the same first name, rank, and Army service number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076610C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant submits a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075331C070403
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted. However, these statements are not sufficient by themselves as a basis for an award of the Purple Heart in view of evidence of record which shows the applicant was not wounded as a result of hostile action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015070
The 30 September 1985 DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. [a previously considered] DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 29 November 1984, subject: Award of Purple Heart (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) with enclosures that shows: (1) in a DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 29 November 1984, the applicant stated, in pertinent part, "[he] received a wound to the left hip that was inflicted by hostile enemy fire on 10 May 1968." Records show he was awarded the Purple Heart for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067711C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026097
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 6 June 1966 to 4 June 1967, and from 14 February through 15 May 1968. This document does not show that the applicant was wounded in action. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed that there was sufficient evidence to show the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile fire action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058483C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS : In effect that his military records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH). There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was awarded the Purple...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085670C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 7 October 1999, the ABCMR denied the applicant’s request because the applicant had submitted the same medical evidence it had considered with his previous application and there was an absence of conclusive evidence or an eyewitness account that the injury resulted from combat related action. After review of new evidence submitted by the applicant, the Board concluded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078569C070215
The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted. However, these medical records do not show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, in the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the Board determined that this statement is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078864C070215
There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records, but only as recommended below. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that he individual concerned was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars,...