Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).
3. The applicant states that he was wounded in Vietnam on 6 October 1965 and was awarded the Purple Heart and the CIB; however, those awards were never included on his report of separation (DD Form 214).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted on 23 December 1964 for a period of 3 years and airborne training. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 11 July 1965, for duty as an infantry direct fire crewman with the 503rd Infantry Regiment.
5. On 6 October 1965, while on a search and destroy mission, the applicant received metal fragment wounds to the chest when hostile artillery rounds exploded in the area. He was initially treated at the 3rd Mobile Army Surgical Hospital in Vietnam, then was transferred to Tripler Army Medical Center in Hawaii and then transferred to Walter Reed General Hospital in Washington, D.C. He was then transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, where he was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 27 September 1966. He remained at Fort Bragg until he was again transferred to Vietnam on 16 March 1967. He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 101st Airborne Division, for duty as an infantry operations and intelligence specialist.
6. He departed Vietnam on 15 December 1967 for Fort Lewis, Washington, where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 18 December 1967, as an overseas returnee. He had served 2 years, 11 months and 26 days of total active service and was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his statutory service obligation. His DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Bronze Star Medal and the Parachutist Badge.
7. A review of his records fails to show orders for awards of the Purple Heart or the CIB. However, his records do show that he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – Second Class (RVNCAHM-SC) Unit Citation on 7 July 1968 and on 28 November 1984, the Reserve Component Personnel Administration Center in St. Louis, Missouri, authorized the issuance of the Purple Heart and CIB to the applicant. However, those awards were never included on his DD Form 214. His records also show that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is absent any disciplinary action or derogatory information.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). It states, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. It is awarded on a selective basis to each soldier who distinguishes him or herself from among their fellow soldiers by their exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity throughout their service. There is no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander has approved the award and the award has been announced in permanent orders. Separation transfer points will review records of enlisted personnel being separated to determine whether they qualify for award of the GCMDL. Where possible, a reasonable effort will be made to contact the unit commander prior to awarding the medal to qualified members.
9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that subsequent to the applicant’s departure from Vietnam, his unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) for the period he served with the unit.
10. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the CIB. It states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for the CIB, an individual must be an infantryman with an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and must perform duty as an infantryman, as a member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period in which that unit was engaged in ground combat. Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient.
11. That regulation also provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
12. Army Regulation 672-5-1 also provides a list of campaigns conducted and shows that the applicant was authorized to be credited with participation in three separate campaigns.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although there are no orders in the available records to document his awards of the Purple Heart and CIB, there is sufficient evidence available to show that he was wounded in action against the enemy while serving as an infantryman in an infantry unit in Vietnam on 6 October 1965 and that he was treated for those wounds. Accordingly, it is reasonable to believe that he was in fact awarded the Purple Heart and CIB as he claims, and that the omission of those awards from his records was the result of an administrative oversight. Therefore, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to correct that error at this time by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart and CIB.
2. Although awarded subsequent to his departure, the applicant was also entitled to be awarded the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the PUC. Therefore, it would be appropriate to do so at this time.
3. The applicant was also awarded the RVNCAHM – SC Unit Citation and that award should also be added to his records.
4. The applicant also participated in three campaigns and is authorized to be issued three bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to do so at this time.
5. The Board also notes that the applicant had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his records contain no derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the GCMDL. Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to award him the GCMDL for the period of 23 December 1964 to 18 December 1967.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by awarding the individual concerned the GCMDL for the period of 23 December 1964 to 18 December 1967.
b. by awarding him the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the PUC and three bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal, and;
c. by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart, the CIB and the RVNCAHM – SC Unit Citation.
BOARD VOTE:
__mvt___ ___le ___ ___rjw___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Raymond J. Wagner____
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2002071820 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 2002/08/08 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT PLUS |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000/CORR 214 |
2. 46 | 107.0000/DECORATIONS/AWDS |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010648C070208
The applicant’s medical records were not available for review by the Board. Inasmuch as the wound must be documented as being the result of enemy action and the documents do not substantiate either that fact or the date of occurrence, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence presented with his application or the evidence of record, that he meets the prerequisites of the applicable regulations for award of the Purple Heart at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073599C070403
He was initially assigned to the A Battery, 6 th Battalion, 29 th Artillery , 4 th Infantry Division as a cannoneer. Although the applicable regulation provides that the CIB is only awarded to personnel who possess an infantry military occupational specialty who are assigned to an infantry unit that engages in ground combat against an enemy; there were exceptions made through a published supplement which clearly indicates that radio operators who served as advisors in infantry or infantry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082331C070215
He had served 2 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 indicates that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050016517C070206
He completed his BCT and was transferred to Fort Lee, Virginia, to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as a petroleum storage specialist. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart and by awarding him the GCMDL for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065933C070421
Where possible, a reasonable effort will be made to contact the unit commander prior to awarding the medal to qualified members. Accordingly, his records should be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and his overseas service from 4 March 1968, until he was evacuated to WBGH on 29 September 1968. Accordingly, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to award him the GCMDL for his service during the period of 21 September 1967 through 20 June 1969.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003459C070206
The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. The applicant has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, sufficient evidence to establish his entitlement to the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064776C070421
The applicant states that he was injured on active duty when his shoulder was dislocated while engaged with the enemy snipers in Vietnam. The evidence of record fails to clearly show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action, in fact, the evidence shows that he initially injured himself during his infantry training and that his surgery was the result of recurring dislocations. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060831C070421
Given his record of exemplary service, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to award him the GCMDL for the period of 22 November 1965 to 21 November 1968. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the GCMDL for the period of 22 November 1965 to 21 November 1968, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the PUC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485
The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004633C070206
Scott W. Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...