Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071675C070403
Original file (2002071675C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 29 AUGUST 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002071675


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Christopher J. Prosser Member
Mr. Harry B. Oberg Member


         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his 15 September 1991 DD Form 214 be corrected to show his rank and grade as Specialist Four (SP4) and E-4, respectively, and that his reentry code of 3C be corrected in order for him to return to active duty.

He states that his microfiche (Official Military Personnel File) and his Personnel Qualification Record both show that his last rank was SP4. His microfiche is unavailable to the Board.

In a 24 June 2000 request to a Member of Congress the applicant stated that he needed his rank and reentry code corrected so that he could return to the Army or enlist in the Army Reserve. He stated that the Army would not allow him to enlist in pay grade E-3 with 6 1/2 years of prior service.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted in the Army for 3 years on 3 January 1985, completed training as an infantryman, and in April 1985 was assigned to an infantry battalion in Germany. In June 1986 he returned to the United States and was assigned to Fort Hood, Texas. The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record – Part II (DA Form 2-1) shows that he was promoted to SP4 on 20 May 1987.
He reenlisted for 4 years in pay grade E-4 on 16 September 1987. He served in Saudi Arabia from 10 October 1990 to 17 April 1991.

On 21 March 1991 the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. His rank on the order effecting that award is PFC (Private First Class).

The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record, Part I, prepared on 20 August 1991 shows his rank as PFC, with a date of rank of 20 October 1990.

Orders published by Headquarters III Corps and Fort Hood, dated 20 August 1991, show that he was reassigned to the Army transition point at Fort Hood, for transition processing and release from active duty. His rank on those orders is shown as PFC.

The applicant applied for a Reserve identification card on 26 August 1991. The application form, which he signed, shows his rank as PFC.

On 29 August 1991 the applicant completed a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) agreeing to serve in the Army Ready Reserve for a period of three years. His grade on that form is shown as E-3.

The applicant was released from active duty on the expiration of his term of service (ETS) 15 September 1991. He had 6 years, 8 months, and 8 days of service. His rank shown on his DD Form 214 is PFC E-3, with a date of rank of 20 October 1990. He was awarded separation pay of $8,011.60. His DD Form 214 shows a reentry code of “3C.”

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210, then in effect, covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter identifies reentry eligibility (RE) codes. Those codes are used for administrative purposes only and used for identification of an enlistment processing procedure.

RE-3C applies to persons who do not meet the reentry grade and service criteria contained in Army Regulation 601-210. That regulation states in effect that applicants are eligible for enlistment if they were last separated from active duty in pay grade E-3 with total active service of less than 3 years. Personnel with a RE-3C code are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted.

There is no evidence, nor has the applicant provided any, to indicate that his rank and pay grade on his DD Form 214 is incorrect. The preponderance of evidence clearly shows that his rank and pay grade was PFC E-3, respectively at the time of his release from active duty. Furthermore, his reentry code of 3C as shown on his DD Form 214 is also correct. Consequently, there is no basis correct his record as he requests.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 15 September 1991, the date of his release from active duty. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 15 September 1994.

The application is dated 25 March 2002 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant’s entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant’s failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MKP__ __CJP _ __HBO__ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION



Carl W. S. Chun
Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002071675
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020829
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020155

    Original file (20090020155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his rank at the time of his separation from active duty on 2 March 1992 was specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4. The applicant contends that the rank of PFC (E-3) and RE Code of "RE-3C" shown on his DD Form 214 should be corrected because he held the rank of SPC (E-4) at the time of his voluntary separation under the 1990 Early Transition Program and he should not be penalized with the RE code that he was issued. There is no evidence that the applicant was reduced in rank...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004420

    Original file (20090004420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in two separate applications, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. Soldiers in the rank of PFC who are on a 2-year initial enlistment and who will have 24 months or less of active Federal service on the day they are discharged to reenlist may, if otherwise qualified, to include those with approved waivers, be reenlisted without a grade waiver. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013205

    Original file (20090013205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that the applicant's DD Form 214 issued on 20 July 1990 shows his correct rank, pay grade, DOR, and MOSC. Thus, the evidence of record indicates the applicant's discharge orders show the incorrect rank; however, the MOSC is correct. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, ARPC-PAT-R(N1), Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013241

    Original file (20100013241.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record contains a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form) which shows he successfully completed the St. Mary's High School course of instruction on 23 February 1982 and directed that this educational accomplishment be entered in his permanent military record and filed his personnel records. The reenlistment or extension of a current enlistment for Soldiers in pay grade E-3 and below would not exceed 3 years of active Federal service. The applicant requests administrative corrections to his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013298

    Original file (20080013298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 23 July 1982. Table 3-1 included a list of the Regular Army Reenlistment Eligibility Codes (RE codes): a. RE–1, applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the applicant’s RE Code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013142

    Original file (20100013142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his records be purged of all references to the imposition of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); that his rank be restored; that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be corrected; and that the pay taken as a result of these errors be refunded. The earlier application included the following: a. a copy of the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016724

    Original file (20080016724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was authorized separation pay upon his discharge in May 1983. On 4 October 1981, the commander of the Soldier who accidently fired his weapon submitted a report of disciplinary or administrative action and indicated that the aggravated assault was unfounded and that a written reprimand/admonition was rendered to that Soldier for dereliction of duty. With respect to the applicant's contention that the Board should conduct an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04105356C070208

    Original file (04105356C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 1991 separation document be corrected to show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, an Army Commendation Medal, the Army Achievement Medal, and the Southwest Asia Service Medal. The fact that he received an RE Code of 1 at the time of his separation, further supports the conclusion that he had not been reduced from pay grade E-4 to E-3 prior to his separation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609487C070209

    Original file (9609487C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also, he requests correction of his records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. The U.S. Army Enlistment Eligibility Activity (USAEEA), in a comment, opined that the reentry code RE-3C is correct as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 in accordance with table 3-6, Army Regulation 601-210, dated 14 February 1990. The reentry code of RE-3C applies to persons who have completed more than 4 months service who do not meet the basic eligibility pay grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012068C070206

    Original file (AR20050012068C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The RCP for personnel serving in the pay grade of E-4 in 1991 was 10 years. Accordingly, he was properly discharged in the pay grade of E-4 on 10 September 1991.