| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Arthur O. Omartian | Member | ||
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions. He states that he made a stupid mistake as a young soldier. In light of the events of 11 September 2001, he wants to set the record straight so he can say to his children, “I served with pride.” He was a good soldier who volunteered. He went absent without leave (AWOL) and has regretted it for 23 years. He provides his Report of Separation from Active Duty, DD Form 214, a fingerprint record, and three character witness statements as supporting evidence.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was born on 26 September 1956. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 February 1978. He was selected as the Battalion Trainee Leader of the Week for the cycle period 21 through 28 February 1978. He was selected as the Outstanding Soldier of the 1st Basic Training Brigade for the week 27 February through 4 March 1978. He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).
On 23 April 1979, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant charging him with being AWOL from 1 June 1978 to on or about 24 April 1979.
On 25 April 1979, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant was advised of the effects of a discharge UOTHC and that he might be deprived of many or all Army and Veterans Administration benefits. He submitted a statement in his own behalf. He stated that he applied for Officer Candidate School while at Fort Benning, GA. All went fine until one night he went to the post exchange against the instructions of his drill sergeant. Shortly thereafter, the company commander rescinded his application and that contributed to his going AWOL. He requested a general discharge since his record was exemplary. He intended to complete the final two years of his college education and his discharge could harm his chances for employment after graduation.
On 14 May 1979, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s request and directed he receive a discharge UOTHC.
On 23 May 1979, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a discharge UOTHC. He had completed 4 months and 23 days of creditable active service and had 354 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. A discharge UOTHC is normally considered appropriate.
On 13 August 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgraded discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress. The applicant was 21-years old at the time he went AWOL. The Board has considered how well he did in basic training and his character witness statements; nevertheless, considering the length of his AWOL these factors do not warrant granting the relief requested.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__KAK__ __AOA__ __RJW__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002071369 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/07/02 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1979/05/23 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, ch 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A70.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010801C080213
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He stated that if returned to duty he would again go AWOL. __Richard T. Dunbar___ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20070010801 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 20071220 TYPE OF DISCHARGE UOTHC DATE OF DISCHARGE 19790509 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, ch 10 DISCHARGE REASON A70.00 BOARD DECISION DENY REVIEW AUTHORITY Ms. Mitrano ISSUES 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015247
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 May 1979, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he be furnished a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Since the applicants brief record of service included one nonjudicial punishment and 105 days of lost time, his record of service was not satisfactory.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077233C070215
On 30 September 1981, the approval authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of chapter 10 and directed that he be separated with a UOTHC discharge in pay grade E-1. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017023
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged from active duty on 10 February 1981 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service with an UOTHC discharge. There is no evidence of record which indicates the actions taken in his case were in error or unjust, therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001269C070205
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 2 February 1979, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he be furnished a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 13 February 1979 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, in lieu of court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017798
The discharge authority approved her request for separation for the good of the service and directed that she be discharged with a UOTHC discharge certificate. A punitive discharge is authorized for offenses under Article 86 for periods of AWOL in excess of 30 days. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006377
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His record then shows the following: * absent without leave (AWOL) from Fort Jackson during the period 17 October 1978 through 27 November 1978 * returned to military control (RMC) at Fort Meade, MD on 28 November 1978 * transferred to the U.S. Army Personnel Control Facility (PCF), Fort Dix, NJ on 4 December 1978 * AWOL during the period 4 December 1978 through 17 March 1979 * RMC at Fort Dix on 18 March 1979 * AWOL during the period 5...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075286C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded to a general discharge. Although there is no evidence of record to show the applicant had a drug problem while he was in the Army, the Board notes his contention that he had completed drug rehabilitation while in Germany but he became involved in drugs again after arriving at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071837C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : That he voluntarily enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) because it was the right thing to do. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072376C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. He enlisted at age 17 on 4 November 1975, for a period of 3 years, training as an infantry indirect fire crewman and assignment to Fort Carson.