| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member | |
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He states he received a bad conduct discharge but believes it should have been a general discharge. He notes that he received "forms to fill out but they were destroyed by a house fire." He submits no evidence in support of his request.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He entered active duty on 5 June 1969, at the age of 20, with 11 years of formal education. He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training and received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings. In November 1969 he arrived in Vietnam where he was assigned duties as a senior field switchboard operator and was promoted to pay grade E-3.
On 31 March 1970, while on emergency leave from Vietnam, the applicant was reported as AWOL (absent without leave) and subsequently dropped from the rolls of the Army. He was apprehended by officials from the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) and returned to military control on 18 July 1973.
On 5 September 1973 the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial as a result of his AWOL. His sentence included 4 months confinement at hard labor, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to pay grade E-1, and a bad conduct discharge. The applicant was discharged under "conditions other than honorable" on 13 December 1973 and issued a Bad Conduct Discharge Certificate. At the time of his separation he had nearly 10 months of active Federal service and more than 1300 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
The applicant indicated in his application that he received "forms to fill out" and may be referring to Presidential Proclamation 4313. President Ford issued this proclamation in September 1974. It identified three categories of persons and permitted them to apply for a clemency discharge. Those categories were:
1) civilian fugitives who were draft evaders,
2) members of the military who were still AWOL, and
3) former military members who had been discharged for desertion, AWOL or missing movement.
Those individuals who were AWOL were afforded the opportunity to return to military control and accept an undesirable discharge or stand trial. For those who elected to earn a clemency discharge, (AWOL's and discharged members) they could be required to perform up to 24 months alternate service. Upon successful completion a clemency discharge would be issued. In any event, the clemency discharge did not affect the individual's underlying discharge, and did not entitle him to any VA benefits. There is no evidence the applicant applied for clemency under this program or that he ever completed any alternate service, which would qualify him for a clemency discharge. At any rate, even if the applicant had been granted a clemency discharge he would not have been entitled to any VA benefits, if that were the reason he is now seeking to have his discharge upgraded.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, which would serve as a basis to upgrade his discharge.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 13 December 1973, the date the applicant was discharged. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 13 December 1976.
The application is dated 19 March 2002 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by
law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__TSK __ __JTM __ __HBO______ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2002071249 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020711 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003601C070205
The letter indicates that Presidential Proclamation 4313 further provided that those servicemen who satisfactorily completed an assigned period of alternate service of not more than 24 months would be issued a Clemency Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence of record which indicates he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant’s records were reviewed for an upgrade of his discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608408C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge because he completed his alternate service under a Presidential clemency program. PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 6 March 1978.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028545
He was sentenced to be discharged from the service with bad conduct discharge. Chapter 11, in effect at the time, stated that a Soldier would be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053812C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. Under this proclamation, eligible deserters were given the opportunity to request discharge, for the good of the service, with the understanding that they...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008319
There is no evidence of record which indicates he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. For those who elected discharge, a Joint Alternate Service Board composed of military personnel would establish a period of alternate service of not more than 24 months that the individuals would perform. There is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he completed his required period of alternate service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014827
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge to an honorable discharge. The complete facts and circumstances concerning the applicant's discharge proceedings are not in the available records; however, on 3 December 1970, the general court-martial convening authority approved the applicant's request for excess leave without pay pending execution of his bad conduct discharge. The applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded to an honorable discharge because he received a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081480C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. It is noted that the clemency...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020231
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate at a time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055025C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014019
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 14 May 1973, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 11-2, with a bad conduct discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.