| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Lee Cates | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. He indicates, in effect, that the upgrade should be under Presidential Proclamation 4313.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 27 May 1975, the applicant entered the Army with a waiver of moral eligibility.
On 1 August 1975, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for his failure to go to his appointed place of duty on 29 July 1975. His punishment included a forfeiture of $50 pay per month for 1 month and extra duty for 7 days
On 28 October 1975, he was placed in an absent without leave (AWOL) status.
On 8 November 1975, his records were flagged pending discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206.
On 16 November 1975, his status was changed to in the hands of civil authorities. He was in jail in Midwest City, Oklahoma pending trial for burglary and other charges.
On 15 January 1976, he was sentenced to 18 months each for burglary, concealment of stolen property and grand larceny. The sentences were to run concurrently.
On 27 January 1976, the unit commander recommended that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, conviction by a civil court.
On 11 March 1976, the appropriate separation authority approved the discharge and directed reduction to pay grade E-1.
On 16 March 1976, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the above cited regulation, with an undesirable discharge. His separation document indicates that he had 5 months and 2 days on net active service and 141 days time lost.
Army Regulation 635-206, Discharge – Misconduct (Fraudulent Entry, Conviction by Civil Court, and AWOL), then in effect, established the policy and prescribed the procedures for the elimination of enlisted personnel for misconduct by reason of being convicted by a civil court during their current term of active military service. The regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
Presidential Proclamation 4313, issued on 16 September 1974, by President Ford, provided for the issuance of a clemency discharge to certain former soldiers, who voluntarily entered into and completed an alternate public works program specifically designed for former soldiers who received a less than honorable discharge for AWOL related incidents between August 1964 and March 1973. Under this proclamation, eligible deserters were given the opportunity to request discharge, for the good of the service, with the understanding that they would receive an undesirable discharge. Upon successful completion of the specified alternative service, the deserter was issued a clemency discharge. A clemency discharge did not restore veteran’s benefits; rather, it restored federal and, in most instances, state civil rights which were previously denied due to the less than honorable discharge. If a participant of the program failed to complete the period of alternative service, the original characterization of service, undesirable would be retained. This policy did not apply to those separated for misconduct conviction by civil court.
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 16 March 1976, the date he was discharged. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 16 March 1979.
The application is dated 11 February 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of the case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit the application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_wtm____ _jtm_____ __aao___ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2001053812 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010731 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016259
However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 27 January 1975, under the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 4313 16 September 1974 and Department of Defense Memorandum with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The letter stated that the requirements of the program were explained to him and efforts were made to provide an opportunity for him to satisfactorily complete his alternate service. Since he did not complete the alternative service, he was not granted a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003601C070205
The letter indicates that Presidential Proclamation 4313 further provided that those servicemen who satisfactorily completed an assigned period of alternate service of not more than 24 months would be issued a Clemency Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence of record which indicates he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant’s records were reviewed for an upgrade of his discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068435C070402
He again went AWOL on 6 July 1968 and remained absent until he contacted military authorities on 3 October 1974, requesting that he be allowed to participate in the program established under Presidential Proclamation 4313. On 20 January 1975, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 4313, dated 16 September 1974. The Clemency Discharge is a neutral discharge, issued neither under “honorable conditions”...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002142
He also states that he completed alternate service and applied for a clemency discharge. He further acknowledged he understood that satisfactory completion of such alternate service will be acknowledged by issuance of a Clemency Discharge Certificate. When the period of alternate service was completed satisfactorily, the Selective Service System notified the individual's former military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007631C070205
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged on 23 January 1970 under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate with service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002972
The applicant states he completed his reconciliation service prescribed by Presidential Proclamation 4313 to upgrade his clemency discharge. He had completed 1 year, 4 months, and 16 days of net active service that was characterized as under other than honorable conditions. When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012361
He was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 4 February 1975 for the good of the service under the provisions of PP 4313. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 4 February 1975. Evidence of record shows he was awarded a clemency discharge in 1976 pursuant to PP 4313 of 16 September 1974.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024950
However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 20 January 1975 under the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 4313 with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The evidence indicates the applicant completed 11 months of alternate service under the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 4313 and was issued a Clemency Discharge. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090770C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following entries in block 44 [Time Lost Under Section 927,Title 10, United States Code and Subsequent to Normal Dates ETS]: 1 June 1970 through 1 June 1970, 1 day absence with out leave (AWOL); 17 September 1970 through 26 October 1970, 40 days AWOL; 11 August...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001160
The applicant's records show that on 10 June 1976, the applicant was sent a letter by the Manager, Reconciliation Service Division, advising him that the Director of the Selective Service System had terminated him from enrollment in the Reconciliation Service Program because he did not complete his required period of alternate service. Clemency Discharges issued pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 4313 did not impact the underlying discharge a member received and did not entitle the...