Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071180C070402
Original file (2002071180C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 30 January 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002071180


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Christopher J. Prosser Member
Ms. Yolanda Maldonado Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that her $20,000 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) contract be honored as written.

3. The applicant states that she executed a SLRP addendum for $20,000, but later discovered that her military occupational specialty (MOS) was only authorized a $10,000 SLRP when she enlisted. She has $14,500 in student loans and would like all of that amount paid under the SLRP.

4. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 February 1990, was awarded the MOS of preventive medicine specialist, and was promoted to pay grade E-4. On 3 January 1995, she was honorably released from active duty due to unsatisfactory performance and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

5. On 10 August 1997, she enlisted in the US Army Reserve (USAR) for 6 years.  In conjunction with her enlistment, she executed a $20,000 SLRP addendum. She was given the higher $20,000 SLRP (normal SLRP is $10,000) because she held an MOS which was presumably on the list of critical skills published by Department of the Army.

6. On 24 January 2002, the applicant’s commander submitted a request for an exception to policy to pay the applicant her $20,000 SLRP. In that request, her commander stated that the applicant was given the $20,000 SLRP because the recruiter used the list which showed which MOS’s were approved for the $20,000 SLRP in 1996. However, since the applicant enlisted in 1997, that list was no longer valid. The 1997 list dropped the applicant’s MOS as a skill approved for the higher $20,000 SLRP. The applicant’s commander determined that the error in preparing her contract did not rest with the applicant. The commander stated that the applicant is an outstanding soldier who has performed her duties with unmatched competence and professionalism.

7. The SLRP provides for the repayment by the Government of a designated portion of any outstanding student loan(s) secured after 1 October 1975. The maximum SLRP amount is $10,000 unless the soldier enlists for an MOS which is on the list of critical skills published by Department of the Army. If a soldier enlists for a critical skill, they are given a maximum SLRP amount of $20,000.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant’s recruiter offered the applicant the $20,000 SLRP in good faith. The recruiter either wasn't furnished, or didn't use, the list of those MOS’s approved for the $20,000 SLRP for 1997.

2. It is evident that the $20,000 SLRP was a major, if not primary, reason the applicant enlisted in the USAR for assignment to a unit.
3. Due to the lengthy passage of time from the date of her enlistment, it would not be fair or equitable to now offer the applicant a discharge from her defective enlistment contract.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the MOS of the individual concerned was on the list of skills approved for the $20,000 SLRP at the time of her enlistment, in this case only, as an exception to policy.

BOARD VOTE:

cjp_____ ___wtm __ ___ym __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Walter T. Morrison _______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002071180
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20030130
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072517C070403

    Original file (2002072517C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she initiated a SLRP contract for $20,000.00 as indicated in the DA Form 5261-4-R (Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum) she includes with her application. In a 30 May 2001 memorandum the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) Office at Fort McCoy stated that although the applicant’s DA Form 5261-4-R was executed with an entitlement of $20,000, she was only eligible for a $10,000 entitlement and payments would be made for that entitlement. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060504C070421

    Original file (2001060504C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In that response the USARC reiterated that the applicant’s MOS was not eligible for the $20,000 SLRP, and added that the regulation which governs the SLRP limits the amount of SLRP a reservist can receive during his or her career as the amount to which he or she While not a matter of record, it would appear likely that any student loans which existed at the time of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009088

    Original file (20090009088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that when he reenlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 13 May 2002 for 6 years, he was told that he would receive $20,000 in college loan repayments in exchange for his commitment. The Office of The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 opines in its advisory opinion that although the applicant's MOS was not authorized $20,000 in college loan repayment without an additional ASI at the time of his reenlistment, based on the confusion of recruiters and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022361

    Original file (20110022361.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she is eligible for both: a. payment of a $10,000 Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) she was guaranteed when she entered military service in 2008; and b. participation in the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) for a maximum amount of $20,000. Her DA Form 5261-X was authenticated by herself and a witnessing official and shows that under the authority of Section 308j of Title 37 U.S. Code (USC) the criteria for her eligibility for the OAB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000883C070206

    Original file (20050000883C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her US Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment contract be honored and that she be paid $10,000 under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). During the enlistment process, the applicant signed a DA Form 3286-67 (Statement of Understanding), acknowledging she was enlisting for MOS 73C (Finance Specialist) and that the MOS qualified for a $10,000 loan repayment under the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000883C070206

    Original file (20050000883C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her US Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment contract be honored and that she be paid $10,000 under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). During the enlistment process, the applicant signed a DA Form 3286-67 (Statement of Understanding), acknowledging she was enlisting for MOS 73C (Finance Specialist) and that the MOS qualified for a $10,000 loan repayment under the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017103

    Original file (20140017103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She formally requested an ETP from the State Incentive Manager on 1 October 2012, wherein she requested relief from, and termination of, the levied recoupment action in the amount of $20,428.45 that resulted from the termination of her incentive entitlements. (8) Furthermore, had she executed a written agreement the bonus would have been terminated in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures), paragraph E3.l.8.2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064497C070421

    Original file (2001064497C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant initialed paragraph 2, section III of the Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum, DA Form 5261, indicating he acknowledged, in connection with his enlistment for entitlement to the SLRP, that he met the listed eligibility criteria, i.e., that he had previous military service and was contracting to serve for 3 or more years in the Selected Reserve and, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023062

    Original file (20110023062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of a $10,000 officer accession bonus (OAB). The applicant states she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), on 20 May 2009, as an 09S (Officer Candidate). As her contract clearly states, she was told she would receive both the OAB and the SLRP upon successful completion of IET.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010247

    Original file (20110010247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. The applicant was subsequently denied payment of the bonus because he exceeded the years of service provision stating that a Soldier could not have more than 10 years of service to receive such bonus. Accordingly, he should not have been given a 6-year contract or a bonus. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant should not have been given a 6-year reenlistment contract or a bonus.