| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: The applicant offers no evidence or argument of error or injustice in his application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant was born on 4 September 1947 and enlisted in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with a waiver for a civil conviction for burglary and larceny on 14 August 1967, for a period of 3 years.
On 22 November 1967, while attending his advanced individual training, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for stealing a pair of trousers from the post exchange. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay and restriction.
He completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 16 January 1968, for duty as a cargo handler. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 25 January 1968. He completed his tour in Vietnam on 11 January 1969 and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado.
On 3 April 1969, NJP was imposed against him for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 6 March to 12 March and 12 March to 14 March 1969. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and a reprimand.
His records show that he began a series of going AWOL and received NJP on two more occasions and was convicted by special court-martials in April and May 1969 for AWOL offenses.
On 17 May 1969, he again went AWOL and remained absent until he was apprehended by civil authorities and was returned to military control at Fort Meade, Maryland on 29 August 1969.
The actual facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s administrative separation are not present in the available records. However, his records do contain a duly constituted report of separation signed by the applicant, which shows that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 14 October 1969, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 1 year, 9 months, and 6 days of total active service and had 145 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Such a request is strictly voluntary on the part of the person who has been charged and they must indicate that they have been briefed on the consequences of accepting a discharge under other than honorable conditions and must also indicate that they have not been coerced by anyone to request such a discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, it must be presumed that the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. A request for discharge under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial requires a voluntary request on the part of the individual concerned. Therefore, it appears that he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__dh____ ___cla___ __be____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002070805 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/13 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1969/10/14 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200, CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016211
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, at the time of the applicants separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge. XXX ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052792C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: His records also show that he went AWOL on three separate occasions from 6 to 18 April 1971, from 6 July to 28 November 1971 and from 2 December 1971 to 4 January 1972.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085517C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068911C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001382
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued shows he was discharged on 10 December 1969 under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 in lieu of trial by a court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. Discharges under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 are voluntary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091341C070212
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The application submitted in this case is dated 20 May 2003. There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080025C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: On 29 January 1968, the special court-martial convening authority vacated the suspended portion of his sentence to confinement at hard labor for 4 months and directed his confinement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051452C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 2 months and reduction to the grade of PV1.On 22 December 1969, the applicant was convicted again by a special court-martial for being AWOL from 19 November 1969 to 24 November 1969. There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9022464
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: He was promoted to the pay grade of E-4 on 6 January 1969 and he served in Vietnam until 18 June 1969.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062803C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 28 November 1969, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed an undesirable discharge. On 26 August 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.