| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Member | ||
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he knows that he did wrong; however, he went to Vietnam to serve his country and did not shirk his responsibility in that respect.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on 31 July 1967 for a period of 3 years and training as a military policeman. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 18 December 1967. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 19 November 1968.
He departed Vietnam on 10 December 1968 for assignment to Fort Benning, Georgia, with a report date of 26 January 1969. He failed to report as ordered and was reported as being absent without leave (AWOL).
He remained absent until he was returned to military control at Fort Meade, Maryland, on 10 October 1969, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offense.
He was convicted by a special court-martial on 24 November 1969, of being AWOL from 26 January to 10 October 1969. He was sentenced to a reduction to the pay grade of E-1, confinement at hard labor for 2 months and a forfeiture of pay.
He was released from confinement on 7 January 1970 and was assigned to Fort Meade. He again went AWOL on 4 May 1970 and remained absent until he was again returned to military control at Fort Meade on 16 September 1970, where charges were preferred against him.
On 23 September 1970, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also acknowledged that he understood that he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of all benefits as a result of such a discharge. He further elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority approved his request and directed that he be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 16 October 1970, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 2 years, 1 month and 19 days of total active service and had 392 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a voluntary request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was at that time and is still normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering the length of his absences.
4. The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been considered by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his overall record of service. While the applicant did serve in Vietnam, his disciplinary record as well as the lack of mitigating circumstances to explain his misconduct clearly warranted the discharge he received.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___kan __ __rvo ___ __pm ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003085517 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/07/03 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1970/10/16 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056121C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. In April 1966 he went absent without leave (AWOL) for 2 days and nonjudicial punishment was again imposed against him, which resulted in his being reduced to the pay grade of E-2.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022743
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074953C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008490
In his request for discharge he indicated: * he was making the request of his own free will and he had not been subjected to any coercion whatsoever by any person * he did not desire any further rehabilitation under any circumstances because he had no desire to perform further service * he acknowledged he understood that by requesting discharge he was admitting guilt to the charges against him or of lesser-included offenses that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015055
The applicant contends, in effect, that his undesirable discharge, under other than honorable conditions, should be upgraded to a general discharge, under honorable conditions, because the U.S. Army cancelled its contract with him to attend the crypto-electronics course at the U.S. Army Electronics School. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was advised that his discharge under conditions other than honorable would automatically be changed to a general discharge under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021587
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 3 February 1970. There is no evidence that the applicant's repeated misconduct, beginning with his disregard of authority in Vietnam and ending with the court-martial charges, was a result of his Vietnam service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014813
On 18 June 1970, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and he voluntarily requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 16 February 1979, after careful consideration of the applicant's military records and all other available evidence, the ADRB determined the applicant's discharge was proper and equitable. Army Regulation 635-200 sets...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000942
He was told he would be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability), with a general discharge. On 5 March 1971, he was discharged in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by a court-martial, with an under other than honorable characterization of service and issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Contrary to his contention that nobody told him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017841
The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. On the same day, having consulted with legal counsel, he voluntarily requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074844C070403
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 13 May 1974, the applicant was discharged accordingly. In December 1970, long before the applicant was returned to military control after being found by the FBI in 1974, the unit commander from his unit in the RVN sent a letter to his mother informing her of his AWOL status.