Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070792C070402
Original file (2002070792C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 4 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002070792

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Jennifer L. Prater Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) and that he was wounded in action.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was injured in a crash landing and was treated for injuries for which he is now receiving disability compensation.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant’s military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire in 1973. The information herein was gleaned from a copy of the applicant’s separation document and a hospital admission record prepared by the Office of the Surgeon General (OTSG), Department of the Army (DA), covering the periods 1942 through 1945 and 1950 through 1954.

The applicant’s separation document shows that he entered active duty on
29 December 1941. He continuously served on active duty until being honorably separated on 7 November 1945, in the rank of staff sergeant (SSG). This document also shows that he participated in the Air Offensive, Japan and Western Pacific campaigns while serving in the Asiatic-Pacific Theater of Operations. It also shows that he earned the following awards during his tenure on active duty: American Theater Ribbon; World War II Victory Medal, European-African-Middle Eastern Theater Ribbon, Good Conduct Medal;
Asiatic-Pacific Theater Ribbon with 2 bronze service stars.

The authorized awards listed in the applicant’s separation document does not include the PH, and the Wounds Received in Action block contains the entry “None”, which indicates that he was not wounded in action during his active duty tenure.

There is a National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) military finding report, dated 9 August 2001, on file that contains information from hospital admission cards created by the OTSG. This document confirms that the applicant was admitted to the hospital in the Asiatic-Pacific Theater of Operations on 4 February 1945, and that he was treated for non-battle related injuries. The listed diagnosis was “Wound(s), contused (includes bruises) Abdomen, abdominal wall and pelvis: Loin.” The causative agent listed was airplane crash without fire and all the injuries received were categorized as non-battle related.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.


The regulatory guidance for award of the PH also includes examples of wounds or injuries that do and do not qualify for award of the PH. These examples include an airplane crash and they state, in pertinent part, that an injury that was the result of an aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire does qualify for award of the PH; however, it also specifies that an injury caused by aircraft accident not caused by or related to enemy action does not qualify for award of the PH.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’ s claim of entitlement to the PH, but it finds insufficient evidence to support this contention. By regulation, to support awarding a PH for an injury or wound received as a result of an aircraft accident, there must be evidence to show the aircraft accident was the result of enemy fire. Injuries received as a result of an aircraft accident, not caused by or the result of enemy action, do not qualify for award of the PH.

2. The applicant is to be congratulated for his outstanding combat service. However, the medical evidence of record confirms only that he was treated as a non-battle casualty for injuries received in an aircraft accident. It does not show that this accident was caused by enemy fire, which would be necessary to qualify for the PH. Lacking independent evidence to the contrary, the Board is compelled to deny the requested relief, in the interest of those who served in World War II and who face similar circumstances.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

JLP AAO RKS DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002070792
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/06/04
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03797

    Original file (BC-2008-03797.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDR states the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate his claim and they are unable to make a determination at this time. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). Therefore, in the absence of evidence of his entitlement to any additional awards or medals, no further action by this Board is necessary.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011276

    Original file (20100011276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's reconstructed records show he is entitled to awards that are not listed on his WD AGO Form 53-55. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient basis for awarding the Purple Heart to the applicant. Therefore, the Board requests that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011327

    Original file (20100011327.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) of his WD AGO Form 53-55 contains the entry "None." Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient basis for awarding the Purple Heart to the applicant. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-Arlington, VA...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03018

    Original file (BC-2003-03018.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03018 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. The applicant appears to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009240C070206

    Original file (20050009240C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence to show a member was wounded in action, was treated for the wound and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Given that the record confirms the applicant was wounded in action on 14 June 1944, while serving in Myitkyina, Burma, it would be appropriate to award him the PH at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084177C070212

    Original file (2003084177C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that a member was wounded or injured in action. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that in addition to those awards already listed in his separation document, the individual concerned is entitled to the Army of Occupation Medal-Japan, the Philippine Republic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605300C070209

    Original file (9605300C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in World War II. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: 1. The clinical record dated 13 September 1944 shows that his wounds resulted from “tripping over a grenade launcher” that exploded causing fragmentation wounds to his chest.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019635

    Original file (20100019635.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Medical record, dated 11 May 1945 * WD AGO Form 53-55 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The FSM’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The medical evidence (service medical record and The Office of The Surgeon General Hospital List) which show the FSM was wounded in action on 11 May 1945 in the Ryukus Islands as a result of enemy action is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006402C070206

    Original file (20050006402C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM’s separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) contains the entry “AP Theater 24 Mar 44” in Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action), and that while the FSM was hospitalized for his war wounds, the PH was awarded to him by a general officer (GO). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02262

    Original file (BC-2006-02262.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 600-45, dated 22 September 1943, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against the enemy or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided the wound necessitated treatment by medical personnel. The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB), on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force, has the authority to determine a veteran’s entitlement to the PH. The PH is awarded for injuries received as a direct result of enemy action.