Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070196C070402
Original file (2002070196C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 27 August 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002070196

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Paul A. Petty Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Mr. Thomas Lanyi Member
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the effective date of separation on his
DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be changed from
1 July 1974 to 28 September 1974, two years from the date of his enlistment in the Regular Army.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was released 89 days early from his
2 year enlistment under the condition that he serve for 1 year in a U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit. He was told by his recruiter that he would receive credit for his full two years enlistment. His DD Form 214 shows 2 years net active service for his enlistment but the separation effective date is 1 July 1974, which is only 1 year, 9 months, and 3 days from his enlistment date on 29 September 1972. Consequently, he is not getting a full two years retirement credit for this period of active Federal service from the U. S. Department of Agriculture for whom he currently works.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

That he enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 September 1972, for a 2 year term of service. On 1 July 1974, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to a USAR Troop Program Unit. His DD Form 214, box 18 (Record of Service), shows 2 years net active service for this period. Box 27 (Remarks) shows, "Early release to serve 1 year in an USAR unit." The authority for separation under these terms is shown in box 9c (Authority and Reason),
"DA message DAPE-MPP 121008Z Oct 71 SPD 432." This message, which implemented post-Vietnam phasedown release programs, authorized such early release under the "Reserve Components In-Service Recruiting Program" for first term soldiers. According to Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), appendix A, the separation program designation (SPD) 432 is for "Enlisted Personnel – Early Release to serve one year in an ARNG or a USAR unit."

In previous similar cases, the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, Headquarters, Department of the Army, has provided an opinion that the Department of the Army never intended or had the legal authority to grant creditable active Federal service for time not actually served on active military duty. The opinion stated that the early release program only gave credit for completing a enlistment so that the soldier would qualify for post-service Veterans Administration benefits.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1. There is no provision of law or regulation to grant active Federal service for time not served on active military duty and, therefore, there is no basis for

altering the applicant's separation or enlistment date on his DD Form 214. Under the "Reserve Components In-Service Recruiting Program, Early Release to serve one year in an ARNG or a USAR unit," the applicant was only given credit for completing his two year enlistment so that he would qualify for post-service Veterans Administration benefits.

2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__iw___ ___tl__ ___ao_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002070196
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020827
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 129.01 – Service Credit
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076730C070215

    Original file (2002076730C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show that:The applicant entered the ROTC program on 5 September 1974. The record contains no evidence that the applicant served with a Reserve unit while participating in the ROTC program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019759

    Original file (20090019759.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was told if he completed corrective training he would receive an honorable discharge * he was a 17 year old Soldier 3. He was sentenced to forfeit $60.00 pay for 1 month. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060807C070421

    Original file (2001060807C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 17 January 1991, the 3/200 ADA battalion commander sent to the applicant at his Loveland, Colorado, address, a AGONM Form 20-12-11B.2 (Record of Special Proceeding of Non-Judicial Punishment – Absence from Unit Training Assembly, Drill, or Annual Training), notifying the applicant of the commander’s intent to impose an Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), punishment of reduction in grade as a result of his 16 unexcused absences from unit drill from September through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014519

    Original file (20060014519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    These orders show that the applicant was honorably discharged from the AKARNG, in the rank of chief warrant office five (CW5)/pay grade W-5, on 30 June 2005, and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve), effective 1 July 2005. Army Regulation 635-100 (Personnel Separations – Officer Personnel), in effect at the time of the applicant’s discharge on 31 August 1994, provides policies and procedures for separating officers from active duty and applied to all Regular Army officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060082C070421

    Original file (2001060082C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) benefit be reinstated and that he be reinstated in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). The applicant’s military records show that he was a U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) captain serving on active duty. An advisory opinion was provided by AR-PERSCOM that some IRR officers in receipt of VSI payments did receive erroneous letters directing them to either join a unit or request discharge but they do not have a record of sending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010877C071029

    Original file (20060010877C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows the applicant received a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment in July 1991 for refusing to attend PLDC. It appears she may have been offered early separation as part of a troop reduction program; however, her voluntary separation was processed under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b because she did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011230C070208

    Original file (20040011230C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, transfer to the Retired Reserve with entitlement to retired pay. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 3 December 1990, the date of his separation from the NYARNG. The applicant's ARNG Retirement Points History Statement, dated 14 October 2004, shows that as of his retirement year ending 3 December 1990, he was credited with 18 years, 3 months, and 12 days creditable service for retired pay.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010131

    Original file (20050010131.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He requests that his records be corrected to show his medical disabilities were incurred while on that period of ADT. There is insufficient evidence to show the applicant's discharge from the ARNG in 1974 should be changed to a medical retirement. The evidence of record already shows the applicant was on active duty (annual training) from 2 through 9 June 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064497C070421

    Original file (2001064497C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant initialed paragraph 2, section III of the Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum, DA Form 5261, indicating he acknowledged, in connection with his enlistment for entitlement to the SLRP, that he met the listed eligibility criteria, i.e., that he had previous military service and was contracting to serve for 3 or more years in the Selected Reserve and, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061905C070421

    Original file (2001061905C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be reinstated in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) and his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments be resumed. On 1 August 1993, he was discharged under the Early Release Program – VSI after completing 9 years, 2 months, and 20 days of creditable active service. The applicant can continue to be eligible for the VSI payments only if his USAR discharge action is voided.